A Review of State-Level Guidance for Implementing Functional Behavior Assessments and Behavior Intervention Plans

Abstract

Implementing functional behavior assessments (FBA) and behavior intervention plans (BIP) to address intensive behaviors continues to challenge educators. State Education Agencies (SEAs) have the capability of delivering FBA/BIP guidance to school districts that is evidence-based, readily available, and useful for consistent application. Although there have been previous studies of SEA guidance, none is recent or examined guidance quality. The purposes of the current study were to review state-level FBA/BIP guidance available on SEA websites to determine the number of states and territories providing guidance and to evaluate the quality of the guidance using a researcher-developed technical adequacy rubric. Results indicated that 38 (68%) of the 56 states/territories provided FBA guidance and 37 (66%) provided BIP guidance; however, most were inadequate. Documents varied from memos to voluminous handbooks with many focusing on compliance rather than evidence-based processes. Implications for practice and suggestions for improving SEA guidance are discussed.

Keywords

functional assessment Positive behavior supports management Behavior Evidence-based practice Leadership issues IDEA Legal/policy issues

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allday

R. A.

Nelson

J. R.

Russel

C. S.

(2011). Classroom-based functional behavioral assessment: Does the literature support high fidelity implementation? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22(3), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311399380

Bateman

D. F.

Bateman

C. F.

(2014). A principal’s guide to special education (3rd ed.). The Council for Exceptional Children. Co-Published by the National Association of Elementary School Principals and the National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Bateman

D. F.

Cline

(2019). Special education leadership: Building effective programming in schools. Routledge.

Blood

Neel

R. S.

(2007). From FBA to implementation: A look at what is actually being delivered. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(4), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2007.0021

Browning-Wright

Mayer

G. R.

Cook

C. R.

Crews

S. D.

Kraemer

B. R.

Gale

(2007). A preliminary study on the effects of training using Behavior Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide (BSP-QE) to improve positive behavioral support plans. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(3), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2007.0017

Bruni

T. P.

Drevon

Hixson

Wyse

(2017). The effect of functional behavior assessment on school-based interventions: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Psychology in the Schools, 54(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22007

Carter

D. R.

Horner

R. H.

(2009). Adding function-based behavioral supports to First Step to Success: Integrating individualized and manualized practices. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708319125

Center on PBIS. (2022). Tier 3 comprehensive functional behavior assessment (FBA) guide. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/tier-3-comprehensive-functional-behavior-assessment-fba-guide

Chezan

L. C.

McCammon

M. N.

Wolfe

Drasgow

Tabacu

L. M.

(2022). Teacher’s familiarity, confidence, training, and use of problem behavior interventions for learners with autism spectrum disorder in school settings. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09885-2

10.

Chezan

L. C.

Wolfe

Drasgow

(2023). Evidence-based practices for supporting individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Roman and Littlefield Publishers.

11.

Chitiyo

Wheeler

J. J.

(2008). Challenges faced by school teachers in implementing positive behavior support in their school systems. Remedial and Special Education, 30(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508315049

12.

Cook

C. R.

Mayer

G. R.

Wright

D. B.

Kraemer

Wallace

M. D.

Dart

Collins

Restori

(2012). Exploring the link among behavior intervention plans, treatment integrity and student outcomes under natural educational conditions. The Journal of Special Education, 46(1), 3–16. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910369941

13.

Doolittle

Horner

R. H.

Bradley

Sugai

Vincent

C. G.

(2007). Importance of student social behavior in the mission statements, personnel preparation standards, and innovation efforts of state departments of education. The Journal of Special Education, 40(4), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070400040501

14.

Endrew F. v Douglas County School District, 137 S. Ct. 988 (2017).

15.

Etscheidt

(2006). Behavioral intervention plans: Pedagogical and legal analysis of issues. Behavioral Disorders, 32(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100202

16.

Filter

K. J.

Horner

R. H.

(2009). Function-based academic interventions for problem behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0043

17.

Garwood

J. D.

(2022). Special education burnout and fidelity in implementing behavior support plans: A call to action. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 31(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266221099242

18.

Goh

A. E.

Bambera

L. M.

(2012). Individualized positive behavior support in school settings: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510383990

19.

Hirsch

S. E.

Lewis

T. J.

Griffith

C. A.

Carlson

Brown

Katsiyannis

(2023). An analysis of selected aspects of functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans. The Journal of Special Education, 57(3), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221146168

20.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

21.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq (2004). (Reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990).

22.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Regulations (2006). 34 C.F.R. § 300 et seq.

23.

Ingram

Lewis-Palmer

Sugai

(2005). Function-based intervention planning comparing the effectiveness of FBA function-based and non-function-based intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(4), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007050070040401

24.

Iovannone

Moore

T. D.

Williams

Sanchez

Kauk

(2024). Are we on course yet? Functional behavior assessment and behavior intervention plan technical adequacy in schools. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060466

25.

Jeong

Copeland

S. R.

(2019). Comparing functional behavior assessment-based interventions and non-functional behavior assessment-based interventions: A systematic review of outcomes and methodological quality of studies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 29, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09355-4

26.

Johnson

A. H.

Goldberg

T. S.

Hinant

R. L.

Couch

L. K.

(2018). Trends and practices in functional behavior assessments completed by school psychologists. Psychology in Schools, 56(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22191

27.

Katsiyannis

Conroy

Zhang

(2008). District-level administrators’ perspectives on the implementation of functional behavior assessment in schools. Behavioral Disorders, 34(1), 14–26.

28.

Killu

Weber

K. P.

Derby

K. M.

Barretto

(2006). Behavior intervention planning and implementation of positive behavioral support plans. An examination of states adherence to standards for practice. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(4), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080040201

29.

McKenna

J. W.

Flower

Adamson

(2015). A systematic review of function-based replacement behavior interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavior Modification, 40(5), 678–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515621489

30.

Newcomer

L. L.

Lewis

T. L.

(2004). Functional behavioral assessment: An investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12(3), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266040120030401

31.

OSEP Questions and Answers. (1999, March 12). Federal Register, 64(48), 12617–12632.

32.

Payne

L. D.

Scott

T. M.

Conroy

(2007). A school-based examination of the efficacy of function-based intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 32(3), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290703200302

33.

Pindiprolu

S. D.

Peterson

S. M.

Bergloff

(2007). School personnel’s professional development needs and skill level with functional behavior assessments in ten Midwestern states in the United States: Analysis and issues. Journal-International Association of Special Education, 8(1), 31–42.

34.

Stemler

S. E.

(2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7275/96jp-xz07

35.

Sugai

Horner

R. H.

Dunlap

Hieneman

Lewis

T. J.

Nelson

C. M.

Scott

T. M.

Liaupsin

C. J.

Sailor

Turnbull

Wickham

Ruef

M. B.

Wilcox

B. L.

(1999). Technical assistance guide 1: Applying positive behavioral support and functional behavior assessment in schools (Version 1.4.4). University of Oregon, OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.

36.

U.S. Department of Education. (2007, February 6). Christensen letter dated 02/06/07 re: Clarifications on Part B regulation. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/idea/policy/speced/guid/idea/letters/2007-1/redacted020607eval1q2007.pdf

37.

U.S. Department of Education. (2008, June 5). Janssen letter dated 06/05/08 re: Student Discipline. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/idea-files/policy-letter-june-5-2008-to-austin-independent-school-district-general-counsel-ylise-janssen/

38.

U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Questions and Answers (Q&A) on U.S. Supreme Court Case Decision Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1. Office of Special Education Programs. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/qa-endrewcase-12-07-2017.pdf

39.

U.S. Department of Education. (2022a). OSEP Discipline-Behavior Guidance. Office of Special Education Programs. https://osepideasthatwork.org/federal-resources-stakeholders/topical-issues/2022-osep-discipline-behavior-guidance

40.

U.S. Department of Education. (2022b). Questions and Answers: Addressing the Needs of Children with Disabilities and IDEA’s Discipline Provisions. Available at https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/qa-addressing-the-needs-of-children-with-disabilities-and-idea-discipline-provisions.pdf

41.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2024). Using functional behavioral assessments to create supportive learning environments. Available at https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/Functional-Behavioral-Assessments-11-19-2024.pdf

42.

Van Acker

Boreson

Gable

R. A.

Potterton

. (2005). Are we on the right course? Lessons learned about current FBA/BIP practices in schools. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-0960-5

43.

Weber

K. P.

Killu

Derby

K. M.

Barretto

(2005). The status of functional behavior assessment (FBA): Adherence to standard practice in FBA methodology. Psychology in the Schools, 42(7), 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20108

44.

What Works Clearinghouse. (2016). Functional behavioral assessment-based interventions. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/intervention/1241

45.

Zirkel

P. A.

(2011). State special education laws for functional behavior assessments and behavior intervention plans. Behavioral Disorders, 36(4), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291103600405N

46.

Zirkel

P. A.

(2017). An update of judicial rulings specific to FBAs or BIPs under the IDEA and corollary state laws. The Journal of Special Education, 51(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917693386