BrodenM., HallR. V., & MittsB. (1971). The effects of self-recording on the classroom behavior of two eighth-grade students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 191–199.
2.
FerritorD. E., BuckholdtD., HamblinR. L., & SmithL. (1972). The non-effects of contingent reinforcement for attending behavior on work accomplished, journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 7–17.
3.
GlynnE. L., & ThomasJ. D. (1974). Effect of cueing on self-control of classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 299–306.
4.
GlynnE. L., ThomasJ. D., & SheeS. M. (1973). Behavioral self-control of on-task behavior in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 105–113.
5.
HallahanD. P., LloydJ., KosiewiczM., KauffmanJ. M., & GravesA. W. (1979). Self-monitoring of attention as a treatment for a learning-disabled boy's off-task behavior. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 24–32.
6.
McLaughlinT. F. (1976). Self-control in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 46, 631–663.
7.
McLaughlinT. F., BrownD., MalabyJ. E., & DolliverP. (1977). The comparative effects of a timing device and group and individual contingencies for on-task behavior and academic responding in a special education class. Behavioral Engineering, 4, 11–15.
8.
McLaughlinT. F., LaffeyP., & MalabyJ. E. (1977). Instructions: Effects for on-task behavior and academic responding: Two case studies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 393–395.
9.
NelsonR. (1977). Methodological issues in assessment via self-monitoring. In ConeJ. D., & HawkinsR. P. (Eds.), Behavior assessment: New directions in clinical psychology (pp. 217–254). New York: Bruner/Mazel.