Is there a link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency? If so, what is the nature of that link? Can it be broken by a program of remediation? This article describes the background, research, and results of a multiyear project, the Learning Disability-Juvenile Delinquency Project, designed to address these questions. The results of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of samples of adolescent males from public schools, juvenile courts, and correctional facilities confirm the school failure theory, the susceptibility theory, and the differential treatment theory—theories positing a causal relationship between learning disability and juvenile delinquency. Adolescents with learning disabilities had significantly higher rates of general delinquent behavior; they engaged in more violence, substance abuse, and school disruption than non-learning-disabled adolescents. The likelihood of arrest and adjudication was also substantially higher for adolescents handicapped by learning disabilities. An evaluation of an academic treatment program demonstrated that remedial instruction was effective in improving the academic skills and decreasing the delinquency of learning disabled youth who had been officially adjudicated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bader, B. W. (1975). Social perception and learning disabilities. Des Moines, IA: Moon Lithographing & Engraving.
2.
Bernstein, S., & Rulo, J. H. (1976). Learning disabilities and learning problems: Their implications for the juvenile justice system. Juvenile Justice, 27, 43–47.
3.
Broder, P. K., Dunivant, N., Smith, E. C., & Sutton, L. P., (1981) Further observations on the link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 838–850.
4.
Comptroller General of the United States. (1977). Learning disabilities: The link should be determined, but schools should do more now. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
5.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
6.
Cox, J. A. (Ed.). (1981). The learning disabled delinquent: Issues and programming. Pensacola, FL: Community Mental Health Center.
7.
Doe v. Koger, 480 F. Supp. 225 (N.D. Ind. 1979).
8.
Dunivant, N. (1982). The relationship between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
9.
Dunivant, N. (1984a). A causal analysis of the relationship between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
10.
Dunivant, N. (1984b). Improving academic skills and preventing delinquency of learning-disabled juvenile delinquents: Evaluation of the ACLD remediation program. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
11.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act, P.L. 94–142, 89 stat. 775 (1975); codified as amended at 20 U.S.C. §§1400–1461 (1976 and Supp. 1980).
12.
Elliot, D. S., & Voss, H. L. (1974). Delinquency and dropout. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
13.
Empey, L. T., & Lubeck, S. G. (1971). Explaining delinquency: Construction, test, and reformation of sociological theory. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
14.
Glaser, D. (1980). The interplay of theory, issues, policy, and data. In M. W. Klein & K. S. Teilman (Eds.), Handbook of criminal justice evaluation (pp. 123–142). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Golinvaux, J. P., & Janeksela, G. M. (1979). Strategic games in juvenile justice: A perspective on system-client interaction. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 30(3), 49–55.
16.
Howard S. v. Friendswood Independent School District, 454 F. Supp. 634 (S.D. Tex. 1978).
17.
Johnson, R. E. (1979). Are adolescent theft, vandalism, and assault due to the same causal processes? International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 49(2), 106–109.
18.
Kaelin v. Grubbs, 682 F. 2d 595 (6th Cir. 1982).
19.
Keilitz, I. & Miller, S. L. (1980). Handicapped adolescents and young adults in the justice system. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 117–126.
20.
Keilitz, I., Saks, M. J., & Broder, P. K. (1979). The evaluation of the learning disabilities/juvenile delinquency remediation program: Evaluation design and interim results. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
21.
Keilitz, I., Zaremba, B. A., & Broder, P. K. (1982). Learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. In L. D. Savitz & N. Johnston (Eds.), Contemporary criminology (pp. 95–104). New York: Wiley.
22.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
23.
Mauser, A. J. (1974). Learning disabilities and delinquent youth, Academic Therapy, 9, 389–400.
24.
McCullough, B. C., Zaremba, B. A., & Rich, W. D. (1979). The role of the juvenile justice system in the link between learning disabilities and delinquency. State Court Journal, 3, 2–47.
25.
Murray, C. A. (1976). The link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency: Current theory and knowledge. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26.
Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979).
27.
Piliavin, I., & Briar, S. (1964). Police encounters with juveniles. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 206–214.
28.
Podboy, J. W., & Mallory, W. A. (1978). The diagnosis of specific learning disabilities in a delinquent population. Federal Probation, 42, 26–33.
29.
Pointer, W. D., & Kravitz, M. (1981). The handicapped offender: A selected bibliography. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
Post, C. H. (1981). The link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency: Cause, effect and “present solutions.”Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 32, 58–68.
31.
Ramos, N. P. (Ed.). (1978). Delinquent youth and learning disabilities. San Rafael, CA: Academic Therapy.
32.
Rehabilitation Act, P.L. 93–112, 87 Stat. 394 (1973) (codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. §794 (1982).
33.
S-1 v. Turlington, 635 F. 2d 342 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1030 (1981).
34.
Sawicki, D., & Schaeffer, B. (1979). An affirmative approach to the LD/JD link. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 30, 11–16.
35.
School Board of Prince William County, Virginia v. Malone, No. 83–862–A (E.D. Va. March 5, 1984), affirmed, No. 84–1347 (4th Cir. May 24, 1985).
36.
Sherry v. N.Y. State Education Department, 479 F. Supp. 1328 (W.D. N.Y. 1979).
37.
Smykla, J. O., & Willis, T. W. (1981). The incidence of learning disabilities and mental retardation in youth under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, 219–225.
38.
Stuart v. Nappi, 443 F. Supp. 1235 (D. Conn. 1978).
39.
Swanstrom, W. J., Randle, C. W., & Offord, K. (1981). The frequency of learning disability: A comparison between juvenile delinquent and seventh grade populations. Journal of Correctional Education, 32, 29–33.
40.
Unger, K. V. (1978). Learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. Journal of Juvenile and Family Courts, 29(1), 25–30.
41.
Ungerleider, D. F. (1985). Reading, writing, and rage: The terrible price paid by victims of school failure. Rolling Hills Estates, CA: Jalmar Press.
42.
Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1981).
43.
Zimmerman, J., Rich, W. D., Keilitz, I., & Broder, P. K. (1981). Some observations on the link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, 1–17.
