The Effects of Comprehension Monitoring Training on the Reading Competence of Learning Disabled and Regular Class Students

Abstract

Thirty-six 10- to 12-year-old learning disabled (LD) children with reading problems and 36 regular class children matched with the LD children on reading age were assigned to four training conditions, designated as read-reread, self-questioning and underlining, self-questioning only, and underlining only techniques. Training was conducted in small groups over a sequence of four half-hour sessions. Subjects were trained to utilize the prescribed techniques while reading comprehension passages. Results indicated that the LD children in all three experimental groups (SU, S, U) achieved significantly higher scores on the comprehension tests than those in the control (R) condition, whereas data on the regular class students in all four conditions revealed nonsignificant differences. The findings demonstrated the benefit of training LD students to use metacognitive activities in reading comprehension.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andre, M. D. A. , & Anderson, T. H. (1978–1979). The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 605–623.

Andrews, R. J. (1973). St. Lucia Graded Word Reading Test. Brisbane: Teaching and Testing Resources.

Baker, L. , & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.

Bock, R. D. (1975). Multivariate statistical methods in behavioural research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Brown, A. L. (1974). The role of strategic behaviour in retardate memory. International Review of Research into Mental Retardation, 7, 55–111.

Finn, J. D. (1976). MULTIVARIANCE: Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance, covariance and regression (computer program). Ann Arbor, MI: National Educational Resources.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Harris, A. J. , & Sipay, E. R. (1975). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods (6th ed.). New York: David Mckay.

Keeney, J. J. , Cannizzo, S. R. , & Flavell, J. H. (1967). Spontaneous and induced verbal rehearsal in a recall task. Child Development, 38, 953–966.

10.

Parker, D. H. (1969). SRA International Reading Laboratory, Ila. Ontario: Science Research Associates (Canada) Inc.

11.

Parker, D. H. , & Scannell, G. (1973). SRA Reading Laboratory, IC (rev. ed.). Chicago: Science Research Associates.

12.

Ringel, B. A. , & Springer, C. J. (1980). On knowing how well one is remembering: The persistence of strategy during transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 322–333.

13.

Singer, H. (1978). Active comprehension from answering to asking questions. Reading Teacher, 31, 901–908.

14.

Torgesen, J. K. (1977). Memorization processes in reading disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 571–578.

15.

Torgesen, J. K. , & Goldman, T. (1977). Rehearsal and short term memory in reading disabled children. Child Development, 48, 56–60.

16.

Tunmer, W. E. , & Cole, P. G. (1985). Learning to read: A metalinguistic act. In C. S. Simon (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success (pp. 293–312). San Diego: College-Hill Press.

17.

Wong, B. Y. L. (1979). Increasing retention of main ideas through questioning strategies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 42–47.

18.

Wong, B. Y. L. , & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacom-prehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–239.