This study examined parenting styles within the families of high performing science students and explored gender differences in the factors associated with an authoritative parenting style. Participants in the study were 363 students who competed in the Canada-Wide Science Fair, 1992. Results showed that the authoritative parenting style was predominant among participants and that few students were from families with permissive, authoritarian, or inconsistent parenting styles. Discriminant analysis indicated that the factors associated with authoritative parenting differedfor male andfemale participants. A greater number offamily-related variables emergedforfemales, whereas more motivational and science outcome variables emerged for males. Results also showed the positive effects of authoritative parenting because adolescents from this type offamily showed higher levels offamily cohesion, interaction, and encouragement as well as higher levels of achievement motivation and higher scores on a science outcome measure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumrind, D.
(1969). Authoritaian vs. authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 3, 1-20.
2.
Baumrind, D.
(1970). Socialization and instrumental competence in young children. Young Children, 26(2), 104-119.
3.
Baumrind, D.
(1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psycholgy Monographs, 4,(1 part 2).
4.
Baumrind, D.
(1973). The development of instrumental competence through socialization. In A.D. Pick (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on childpsychology, (Vol 7, pp. 346-346). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
Baumrind, D.
(1991a). The influence of parenting style on adolescentcompetence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 1, 56-95.
6.
Baumrind, D.
(199lb). Parenting styles and adolescentdevelopment. In J. Brooks-Gumn, R. Lerner, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 746-758). New York: Garland.
7.
Blishen, B. R.
, Carroll, W. K., & Moore, C. (1987). The 1981 socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 24, 465-488.
8.
Breakwell, G. M.
, Fife-Schaw, C., & Devereaux, J. (1988). Parental influence and teenagers' motivation to train for technological jobs. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 79-88.
9.
Cooper, C. R.
, Grotevant, H. D., & Condon, S. M. (1983). Individuality and connectedness in the family as a context for adolescent identity formation and role-taking skill. In H. D. Grotevant & C. R. Cooper (Eds.), New directionsfor child development: Vol. 22. Adolescent development in the family (pp. 43-59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Cureton, E. E.
(1957). The upper and lower 27% rule. Psychometrika, 22, 293-296.
11.
Damon, W.
(1983). Social and personality development (pp. 251-344). New York: Norton.
12.
Dornbusch, S. M.
, Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, H. P., Roberts, D. F., & Fraleigh, M. J. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58, 1244-1257.
13.
Dornbusch, S. M.
, & Steinberg, L. (1991, August). Community influences on the relation of family statuses to adolescent school performance: Differences between African Americans and non-Hispanic Whites. American Jounal of Education, 543-567.
14.
Fitzpatrick, J.L.
, & Silverman, T. (1989). Women's selection of careers in engineering: Do traditional-nontradtional differences sfill exist?Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 34, 266-278.
15.
Grotevant, H. D.
, & Cooper, C. R. (1987). The role of family experience in career exploration: A life-span perspective. In R. Lemer & D. Featherman (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Hauser, B.
, & Garvey, C. (1985). Factors that affect nontraditional vocational enrollment among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 9, 105-117.
17.
Jessor, R.
, & Jessor, S. L. (1978). Theory testing in longitudinal research on marijuana use. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudinal research on drug use: Empiricalfindings and methodological issues (pp. 41-71). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
18.
Krahn, H.
& Lowe, G.S. (1991). Transitions to work: Findings from a longitudinal study of high school and university graduates in three Canadian cities. In D. Ashton & G.S. Lowe (Eds.), Making their way: Education, training and the labour market in Canada and Britain. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
19.
Lambom, S. D.
, Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049-1065.
20.
Lewko, J. H.
, Hein, C., Garg R., & Tesson, G. (1993). Transitions of adolescents into science career pathways. In P. Anisef & P. Axelrod (Eds.), Transitions: Schooling and employment in Canada (pp. 89-112). Toronto: Thompson Educational.
21.
Scanzoni, J.
(1982). Sexual bargaining: Power politics in the American marriage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Shemesh, M.
(1990). Gender-related differences in reasoning skills and leaming interests of junior high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 27-34.
23.
Statistics Canada
. (1992, February). Labourforce annual averages, 1991. Minister of Industry, Science and Technology, Household Surveys Division. Ottawa: Supply and Services.
24.
Steinberg, L.
, Lambom, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266-1281.
25.
Wilson, S. J.
(1982). Women, the family and the economy. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
26.
Youniss, J.
, & Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescent relations with mothers, fathers, and friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
