The Relation of Connection,Regulation,and Support for Autonomy to Adolescents'Functioning

Abstract

How is adolescent functioning related to experiences of connection, regulation, and supportfor autonomy at home, in school, and with peers? Using datafrom the Maryland Adolescent Growth in Context (MAGIC) study (an ongoing longitudinal study of 1,387 African Amenrican and European American adolescents and theirfamilies), it was found that: (a)family demographic characteristics helped predict only academicperformance; (b) although positive experiences on one indicator predicted positive experiences on the other two, each of the three types of experience explained a unique amount of variance in adolescentfunctioning (e.g., regulation related most strongly to externalizing behaviors; in contrast, supportfor autonomy related to all aspects offunctioning); (c) although adolescents with positive interactions in one context were likely to have positive interactions in the other contexts, characteristics of each context explained unique amounts of variance infifuctioning (e.g., experiences with siblings emerged as uniquely important predictors of mental health).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67,3296-3319.

Barber, B. K. (1997). Introduction: Adolescent socialization incontext-Connection, regulation, and autonomy in multiple contexts. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 173-177.

Barber, B. , & Eccles, J. S. (1992). A developmental view of the impact of divorce and single parenting on children and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 108-126.

Barber, B. K. , Olsen, J. E. , & Shagle, S. C. (1994). Associations between parental psychological and behavioral control and youth internalized and externalized behaviors. Child Development, 65, 1120-1136.

Brown, B. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171-196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transaction: Infancy to childhood (pp. 61-97). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Connell, J. P. , & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: Amotivational analysis of self-system processes. In R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.) Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

10.

Eccles, J. S. , Furstenberg, F. , McCarthy, K. , Lord, S. , & Geitze, L. (1993, March). How parents respond to rsk and opportunity in moderate to high risk neighborhoods. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.

11.

Eccles, J. S. , Midgley, C. , Buchanan, C. M. , Wigfield, A. , Reuman, D. , & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage/environment fit. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101.

12.

Eccles, J. E. , Wigfield, A. , & Schiefele, U. (in press). Motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Social development: VoL 4. Carnicheal's handbook of child development. New York: John Wiley.

13.

Elder, G. H. , Eccles, J. S. , Ardelt, M. , & Lord, S. (1995). Inner-city parents under economic pressure: Perspectives on the strategies of parenting. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 771-784.

14.

Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.

15.

Fuligni, A. J. , & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Perceived parent/child relationships and early adolescents' orientation towards peers. Developmental Psychology, 29, 622-632.

16.

Furstenberg, F. F. (1993). How families manage risk and opportunity in dangerous neighborhoods. In W. J. Wilson (Ed.), Sociology and the public agenda. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

17.

Hetherington, E. M. , Cox, M. , & Cox, R. (1982). Effects of divorce on parents and children. In M. Lamb (Ed.), Nontraditionalfamilies (pp. 233-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

Goodnow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.

19.

Lee, V. E. , & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-192.

20.

Magnusson, D. (1988). Individual developmentfrom an interactional perspective: A longitudinal study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

McLanahan, S. , & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent, what hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

22.

Nam, C. B. , & Powers, M. G. (1983). The socioeconomic approach to status measurement: With a guide to occupational and socioeconomic status scores. Houston, TX: Cap and Gown Press.

23.

Patterson, G. R. , Reid, J. B. , & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.

24.

Skinner, E. A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation, and control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

25.

Steinberg, L. (1990). Autonomy, conflict, and harmony in the family relationship. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 255-276). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

White, R. H. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.