To explore potential bases of positive development among gang youth, attributes of positive individual and social behavior were assessed in individual interviews with 45 African American adolescent male members of inner-city Detroit gangs and 50 African American adolescent males from the same communities but involved in community-based organizations aimed at promoting positive youth development. As anticipated, the groups differed in regard to the majority of interview questions and to positive attribute scores pertaining to parents/family, peer relations, school/education, drug use, sexual activity, religious activities/religiosity, racial/ethnic identity, role models/confidants, and neighborhood/safety. The correlations of attributes scores were more often significant (i.e., coupled) for the gang than for the nongang youth. Consistent with the ideas that all young people have resources pertinent to positive development and that, therefore, gang and nongang youth would have some resource comparability, across the nine attributes, about one quarter of the gang youth had total positive attribute scores that were above the average total positive attribute score for the nongang youth. Implications of these findings for both research and applications to programs seeking to promote positive youth development among diverse youth are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. R. (1997). Identity: A brief critique of a cybernetic model. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(3), 358-362.
2.
Adams, G. R., Day, T., Dyk, P., Frede, E., & Rogers, D. (1992). On the dialectics of pubescence and psychosocial development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, 348-365.
3.
Adams, G. R., & Marshall, S. K. (1996). A developmental social psychology of identity: Understanding the person-in-context. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 429-442.
4.
Allison, K. W. (1993). Adolescents living in `non-family' and alternative settings. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Early adolescence: Perspectives on research, policy, and intervention (pp. 37-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Benson, P. (1997). All kids are our kids: What communities must do to raise caring and responsible children and adolescents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Damon, W. (1997). The youth charter: How communities can work together to raise standards for all our children. New York: Free Press.
7.
Dryfoos, J. G. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Fisher, C. B., Jackson, J. F., & Villarruel, F. A. (1998). The study of African American and Latin American children and youth. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 1145-1207). New York: John Wiley.
9.
Grotevant, H. (1998). Adolescent development in family contexts. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 1097-1149). New York: John Wiley.
10.
Hamburg, D. A. (1992). Today's children: Creating a future for a generation in crisis. New York: Time.
11.
Huston, A. C. (Ed.). (1991). Children in poverty: Child development and public policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Jarrett, R. L. (1998). African American children, families, and neighborhoods: Qualitative contributions to understanding developmental pathways. Applied Developmental Science, 2(1), 2-16.
13.
Joe, K. (1993). Issues in accessing and studying ethnic youth gangs. Journal of Gang Research, 1(2), 9-23.
14.
Leffert, N., Benson, P., Scales, P., Sharma, A., Drake, D., & Blyth, D. (1998). Developmental assets: Measurement and prediction of risk behaviors among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 209-230.
15.
Lerner, R. M. (1995). America's youth in crisis: Challenges and options for programs and policies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Lerner, R. M. (1996). Relative plasticity, integration, temporality, and diversity in human development: A developmental contextual perspective about theory, process, and method. Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 781-786.
17.
Lerner, R. M. (1998). Theories of human development: Contemporary perspectives. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development, Vol. 1. Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 1-24). New York: John Wiley.
18.
Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Lerner, R. M., Freund, A. M., DeStefanis, I., & Habermas, T. (2001). Understanding developmental regulation in adolescence: The use of the selection, optimization, and compensation model. Human Development, 44, 29-50.
20.
Lerner, R. M., & Galambos, N. L. (1998). Adolescent development: Challenges and opportunities for research, programs, and policies. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Annual review of psychology, Vol. 49 (pp. 413-446). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
21.
Lerner, R. M., Sparks, E., & McCubbin, L. (1999). Family diversity and family policy: Strengthening families for America's children. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
22.
Luster, T., & McAdoo, H. P. (1994). Factors related to the achievement and adjustment of young African American children. Child Development, 65, 1080-1094.
23.
Luster, T., & McAdoo, H. P. (1996). Family and child influences on educational attainment: A secondary analysis of the High/Scope Perry Preschool data. Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 26-39.
24.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.
25.
McAdoo, H. P. (1995). Stress levels, family help patterns, and religiosity in middle- and working-class African American single mothers. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 424-449.
26.
McAdoo, H. P. (1998). African American families: Strength and realities. In H. C. McCubbin, E. Thompson, & J. Futrell (Eds.), Resiliency in ethnic minority families: African American families (pp. 17-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
McAdoo, H. P. (1999). Diverse children of color. In H. E. Fitzgerald, B. M. Lester, & B. S. Zuckerman (Eds.), Children of color: Research, health, and policy issues (pp. 205-218). New York: Garland.
28.
McLoyd, V. C. (1990). Minority children: Introduction to the special issue. Child Development, 61, 263-266.
29.
McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Children in poverty: Development, public policy, and practice. In W. Damon (Ed.), I. E. Sigel, & K. A. Renninger(Vol. Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (5th ed., pp. 135-208). New York: John Wiley.
30.
Mincy, R. B. (1994). Conclusions and implications. In R. B. Mincy (Ed.), Nurturing young black males: Challenges to agencies, programs, and social policy (pp. 187-203). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
31.
Muuss, R. E. (1996). Theories of adolescence (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
Neely, D. E. (1997). The social reality of African American street gangs. Journal of Gang Research, 4(2), 37-46.
33.
Patton, P. L. (1998). The gangstas in our midst. Urban Review, 30(1), 49-76.
34.
Scales, P., Benson, P., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). The contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 342-347.
35.
Scales, P., & Leffert, N. (1999). Developmental assets: Asynthesis of the scientific research on adolescent development. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
36.
Spencer, M. B. (1990). Development of minority children: An introduction. Child Development, 61, 267-269.
37.
Spencer, M. B. (1995). Old issues and new theorizing about African American youth: A phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory. In R. L. Taylor (Ed.), Black youth: Perspectives on their status in the United States (pp. 38-69). Westport, CT: Praeger.
38.
Spencer, M. B. (1999). Social and cultural influences on school adjustment: The application of an identity-focused cultural ecological perspective. Educational Psychologist, 34, 43-57.
39.
Spencer, M. B., Dupree, D., & Hartmann, T. (1997). A phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST): A self-organization perspective in context. Development & Psychopathology, 9, 817-833.
40.
Taylor, C. S. (1990). Dangerous society. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
41.
Taylor, C. S. (1993). Girls, gangs, women, and drugs. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
42.
Taylor, C. S. (1995, July). The unintended consequences of incarceration: Youth development, the juvenile corrections systems, and crime. Paper presented at the Vera Institute Conference, Harriman, NY.
43.
Taylor, C. S. (2000). Youth gangs. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford: Elsevier.
44.
Taylor, C. S., Villarruel, F. A., & Lerner, R. M. (1998). Overcoming the odds: Understanding successful development among African American and Latino male adolescents. Final Report: 1996-1998. Boston, MA: Boston College, Center for Child, Family, & Community Partnership.
45.
Valdez, A., & Kaplan, C. D. (1999). Reducing selection bias in the use of focus groups to investigate hidden populations: The case of Mexican-American gang members from south Texas. Drugs & Society, 14(1-2), 209-224.
46.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1977). Kauai's children come of age. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
47.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
