Adolescents benefit from contact with high-resource community adults, but intergenerational obstacles make these interactions difficult, fragile, and rare. This qualitative research investigated the success of seven, primarily urban, leadership, and arts programs that attempted to facilitate these interactions within their programming. Program advisors and 71 ethnically diverse program youth (mean age = 16.5) were interviewed biweekly over 3 to 4 months. Analyses indicated that programs were effective in facilitating these interactions through organizing activities that entailed structured, meaningful youth-adult role relationships. Substantial brokering efforts appeared to be required of advisors. Although these contacts involved one-time interactions or, at best, longer-term superficial relationships, youth described obtaining valuable information, skills, and access to adult worlds. The findings illuminate the challenges, limits, and benefits of attempts to bridge youth and adult worlds.
Benson, P.L. ( 1997). All kids are our kids: What communities must do to raise caring and responsible children and adolescents. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
2.
Camino, L. ( 1995). Understanding intolerance and multiculturalism: A challenge for practitioners, but also for researchers. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 155-172.
3.
Camino, L.A. ( 2000). Youth-adult partnerships: Entering new territory in community work and research. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 11-20.
4.
Camino, L. ( 2005). Pitfalls and promising practices of youth-adult partnerships: An evaluator’s reflections. Journal of Community Psychology , 33, 75-85.
5.
Camino, L., & Zeldin, S. ( 2002). From periphery to center: Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of communities. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 212-219.
6.
Charmaz, K. ( 1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation . In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109-129). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
7.
Darling, N., Hamilton, S.E., & Shaver, K.H. ( 2003). Relationships outside the family: Unrelated adults. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 349-370). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
8.
Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development: Committee on community-level programs for youth . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
Furstenberg, F.F., Cook, T.D., Eccles, J., Elder, G.H., & Sameroff, A. ( 1999). Managing to make it: Urban families and adolescent success . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Gilliam, F., & Bales, S. ( 2001). Strategic frame analysis: Reframing America’s youth (Social Policy Report XU[3]). Ann Arbor, MI: Society for Research in Child Development.
11.
Ginwright, S., Noguera, P., & Cammarota. J. ( 2007). Beyond resistance: Youth activism and community change . New York: Routledge.
12.
Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. ( 1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Sage: London.
13.
Granovetter, M.S. ( 1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
14.
Hogan, K. ( 2002). Pitfalls of community-based learning. Teachers College Record, 104, 586-624.
15.
Jarrett, R.L. ( 2003). Worlds of development: The experiences of low-income, AfricanAmerican youth. Journal of Children and Poverty, 9, 157-188.
16.
Jarrett, R.L., Sullivan, P.J., & Watkins, N.D. ( 2005). Developing social capital through participation in organized youth programs: Qualitative insights from three programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 41-55.
17.
Jones, K.R., & Perkins, D.F. ( 2005, October). Determining the quality of youth-adult relationships within community-based youth programs. Journal of Extension , 43. Retrieved March 9, 2009, from http://www.joe.org/joe/2005october/a5.php
18.
Kirshner, B. ( 2008). Guided participation in three youth activism organizations: Facilitation, apprenticeship, and joint work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 60-101.
19.
Larson, R., Hansen, D., & Moneta, G. ( 2006). Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology , 42, 849-863.
20.
Larson, R., Pearce, N., Sullivan, P., & Jarrett, R.L. ( 2007). Participation in youth programs as a catalyst for negotiation of family autonomy with connection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence , 36, 31-45.
21.
Larson, R.W., & Walker, K.C. (in press). Dilemmas of practice: Challenges to program quality encountered by youth program leaders. American Journal of Community Psychology .
22.
Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. ( 2005). Youth-driven and adult-driven youth development programs: Contrasting models of youth-adult relationships. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 57-74.
23.
Larson, R., Wilson, S., Brown, B.B., Furstenberg, F.F., & Verma, S. ( 2002). Changes in adolescents’ interpersonal experiences: Are they being prepared for adult relationships in the 21st century? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 31-68.
24.
McLaughlin, M. ( 2000). Community counts: How youth organizations matter for youth development. Washington, DC: Public Education Network.
25.
McLaughlin, M.W., Irby, M.A., & Langman, J. ( 1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives of inner-city youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
National Research Council Institute of Medicine. ( 2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27.
Ozer, E.J., Cantor, J.P., Cruz, G.W., Fox, B., Hubbard, E., & Moret, L. ( 2008). The diffusion of youth-led participatory research in urban schools: The role of the prevention support system in implementation and sustainability. American Journal of Community Psychology , 41, 278-289.
28.
Patton, M.Q. ( 2002). Qualitative research and evaluative methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
30.
Rhodes, J.E. ( 2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Schlegel, A., & Barry, H. ( 1991). Adolescence: An anthropological inquiry. New York: Free Press.
32.
Steinberg, L. ( 1991). The logic of adolescence. In P. Edelman & J. Ladner (Eds.), Adolescence and poverty: Challenge for the 1990’s (pp. 19-36). Washington, DC: Center for National Policy Press.
33.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Sullivan, P.J. ( 2007). The formation, nature, and utilization of youth-adult contacts made in youth development programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
35.
Taylor, S.J., & Bogdan, R. ( 1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York : John Wiley.
36.
Wilson, W.J. ( 1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Wynn, J.R. ( 1996). Bike shops, tumbling teams, and other primary supports: Opportunities for learning and civic life. Unpublished manuscript .
38.
Zeldin, S. ( 2000). Integrating research and practice to understand and strengthen communities for adolescent development: An introduction to the special issue and current issues. Applied Developmental Science, 4(Suppl. 1), 2-10.
39.
Zeldin, S., Camino, L., & Calvert, M. ( 2003). Toward an understanding of youth in community governance: Policy priorities and research directions. Social Policy Report , 17(3), 3-6.
40.
Zeldin, R., Larson, R., Camino, L., & O’Conner, C. (2005). Intergenerational relationships and partnerships in community programs: Purpose, practice and directions for research. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 1-10.
