Companies are more frequently taking public stands on often controversial social, political, economic, and environmental issues. Despite the importance of the topic, research on understanding the role of companies in societal change through activism is scarce. Using institutional theory, this article defines corporate activism as a company’s willingness to take a stand on social, political, economic, and environmental issues to create societal change by influencing the attitudes and behaviors of actors in its institutional environment. This framework conceptualizes corporate activism as a response to barriers that hinder the solution of an issue. These barriers stem from institutional actors’ attitudes and behaviors toward the issue, and corporate activism can address these barriers through influence and change strategies that can target the institutional environment “top-down” or “bottom-up.” This framework further investigates how the identity orientation of the company facilitates corporate activism. This research has important implications for managers, policy makers, and any other agents that aim to facilitate social change.
AguileraRuth V.RuppDeborah E.WilliamsCynthia A.GanapathiJyoti (2007), “Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 836–63.
3.
AilawadiKusum L.NeslinScott A.LuanY.JackieTaylorGail Ayala (2014), “Does Retailer CSR Enhance Behavioral Loyalty? A Case for Benefit Segmentation,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (2), 156–167.
4.
AjzenIcek (1985), “From Intentions to Action: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” in Action Control: From Cognitions to Behaviors, KuhlJuliusBeckmanJurgen, eds. New York: Springer, 11–39.
5.
AlhoutiSarahJohnsonCatherine M.HollowayBetsy Bugg (2016), “Corporate Social Responsibility Authenticity: Investigating Its Antecedents and Outcomes,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (3), 1242–49.
6.
AllenAlexis M.EilertMeikePelozaJohn (2018), “How Deviations from Performance Norms Impact Charitable Donations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (2), 277–90.
7.
AllenRebeccaBenedettiMary Sovik (2019), “Unravelling US Maternal Mortality Through Critical Discourse Analysis,” Health Education Journal, 78 (6), 681–91.
8.
AndreoniJamesHarbaughWilliamVesterlundLise (2003), “The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments, and Cooperation,” American Economic Review, 93 (3), 893–902.
9.
BarnettMichael L. (2007), “Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 794–816.
10.
BartleyTim (2003), “Certifying Forests and Factories: States, Social Movements, and the Rise of Private Regulation in the Apparel and Forest Products Fields,” Politics and Society, 31 (3), 433–64.
11.
BasuKunalPalazzoGuido (2008), “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking,” Academy of Management Review, 33 (1), 122–36.
12.
BatsonC. DanielEklundJakob HåkanssonChermokValerie L.HoytJennifer L.OrtizBiaggio G. (2007), “An Additional Antecedent of Empathetic Concern: Valuing the Welfare of the Person in Need,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (1), 65–74.
BertelsStephaniePelozaJohn (2008), “Running Just to Stand Still? Managing CSR Reputation in an Era of Ratcheting Expectations,” Corporate Reputation Review, 11 (1), 56–72.
16.
BhagwatYashodaWarrenNooshin L.BeckJoshua T.WatsonGeorge F.IV (2020), “Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (5), 1–21.
17.
BrannonLaura A.TaglerMichael J.EaglyAlice H. (2007), “The Moderating Role of Attitude Strength in Selective Exposure to Information,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43 (4), 611–17.
18.
BricksonShelley L. (2005), “Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link Between Organizational Identity Orientation and Organizations’ Relations with Stakeholders,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 50 (4), 576–609.
19.
BricksonShelley L. (2007), “Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value,” Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 864–88.
20.
BriscoeForrestChinM.K.HambrickDonald C. (2014), “CEO Ideology as an Element of the Corporate Opportunity Structure for Social Activists,” Academy of Management Journal, 57 (6), 1786–1809.
21.
BriscoeForrestGuptaAbhinav (2016), “Social Activism in and Around Organizations,” Academy of Management Annals, 10 (1), 671–727.
22.
BriscoeForrestSaffordSean (2008), “The Nixon-in-China Effect: Activism, Imitation, and the Institutionalization of Contentious Practice,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53 (3), 460–91.
23.
BrowerJacobDacinPeter A. (2020), “An Institutional Theory Approach to the Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship,” Journal of Management Studies, 57 (4), 805–36.
24.
BrownTom J.DacinPeter A. (1997), “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), 68–84.
25.
BuechlerSteven M. (2000), Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism: The Political Economy and Cultural Construction of Social Activism. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
BundyJonathanShropshireChristineBuchholtzAnn K. (2013), “Strategic Cognition and Issue Salience: Toward an Explanation of Firm Responsiveness to Stakeholder Concerns,” Academy of Management Review, 38 (3), 352–76.
27.
CampbellJohn L. (2006), “Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility,” American Behavioral Scientist, 49 (7), 925–38.
28.
CampbellJohn L. (2007), “Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 946–67.
29.
CarlosW. ChadLewisBen W. (2018), “Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 63 (1), 130–69.
30.
CarrollArchie B.ShabanaKareem M. (2010), “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (1), 85–105.
31.
ChatterjiAaron K.ToffelMichael W. (2019), “Assessing the Impact of CEO Activism,” Organization & Environment, 32 (2), 159–85.
32.
CialdiniRobert B. (2003), “Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12 (4), 105–09.
33.
CialdiniRobert B.RenoRaymond R.KallgrenCarl A. (1990), “A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (6), 1015–26.
34.
ClarkeJessica A. (2015), “Against Immutability,” Yale Law Journal, 125 (1), 1–325.
DavisKeithBlomstromRobert L. (1975), Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Den HondFrankde BakkerFrank G.A. (2007), “Ideologically Motivated Activism: How Activist Groups Influence Corporate Social Change Activities,” Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 901–24.
38.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–60.
39.
DurandRudolpheHawnOlgaIoannouIoannis (2019), “Willing and Able: A General Model of Organizational Responses to Normative Pressures,” Academy of Management Review, 44 (2), 299–320.
EaglyAlice H.ChaikenShelly (1995), “Attitude Strength, Attitude Structure, and Resistance to Change,” in Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, PettyRichard E.KrosnickJon A., eds. New York: Psychology Press, 413–32.
42.
EaglyAlice H.ChaikenShelly (1998), “Attitude Structure and Function,” in The Handbook of Social Psychology, GilbertDaniel T.FiskeSusan T.LindzeyGardner, eds. New York: Oxford Press, 269–322.
43.
EllenPam ScholderWebbDeborah J.MohrLois A. (2006), “Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 147–57.
44.
FinkelsteinSydney (1992), “Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation,” Academy of Management Journal, 35 (3), 505–38.
45.
Frazier GaryL.SummersJohn O. (1984), “Interfirm Influence Strategies and Their Application Within Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing, 48 (3), 43–55.
GodfreyPaul C.MerrillCraig B.HansenJared M. (2009), “The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis,” Strategic Management Journal, 30 (4), 425–45.
HambrickDonald C.WowakAdam (2019), “CEO Sociopolitical Activism: A Stakeholder Alignment Model,” Academy of Management Review(published online April 19), DOI: 10.5465/amr.2018.0084.
HillMatthew D.KellyG.WayneLockhartG.Brandonvan NessRobert A. (2013), “Determinants and Effects of Corporate Lobbying,” Financial Management, 42 (4), 931–57.
55.
HillmanAmy J.KeimGerald D.SchulerDouglas (2004), “Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management, 30 (6), 837–57.
56.
HoppnerJessica J.VadakkepattGautham G. (2019), “Examining Moral Authority in the Marketplace: A Conceptualization and Framework,” Journal of Business Research, 95, 417–27.
IyerRajeshMuncyJames A. (2009), “Purpose and Object of Anti-Consumption,” Journal of Business Research, 62 (2), 160–68.
59.
JayachandranSatishKalaignanamKartikEilertMeike (2013), “Product and Environmental Social Performance: Varying Effects on Firm Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 34 (10), 1255–64.
60.
JohnsonCathrynDowdTimothy J.RidgewayCecilia L. (2006), “Legitimacy as a Social Process,” Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53–78.
61.
KangCharlesGermannFrankGrewalRajdeep (2016), “Washing Away Your Sins? Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Marketing, 80 (2), 59–79.
62.
KashmiriSaimMahajanVijay (2017), “Values That Shape Marketing Decisions: Influence of Chief Executive Officers’ Political Ideologies on Innovation Propensity, Shareholder Value, and Risk,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (2), 260–78.
KingBrayden G.PearceNicholas A. (2010), “The Contentiousness of Markets: Politics, Social Movements, and Institutional Change in Markets,” Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 249–67.
65.
KleinJill GabrielleSmithN.CraigJohnAndrew (2004), “Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 92–109.
66.
KozinetsRobert V.HandelmanJay M. (2004), “Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (3), 691–704.
67.
LenzIsabellWetzelHauke A.HammerschmidtMaik (2017), “Can Doing Good Lead to Doing Poorly? Firm Value Implications of CSR in the Face of CSI,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (5), 677–97.
68.
LiedtkaJeanne (2008), “Strategy Making and the Search for Authenticity,” Journal of Business Ethics, 80 (2), 237–48.
69.
LiketKellieMaasKaren (2016), “Strategic Philanthropy: Corporate Measurement of Philanthropic Impacts as a Requirement for a ‘Happy Marriage’ of Business and Society,” Business & Society, 55 (6), 889–921.
70.
LuoXuemingBhattacharyaChitra Bhanu (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value.” Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), 1–18.
71.
MaddenThomas J.EllenPamela ScholderAjzenIcek (1992), “A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Theory of Reasoned Action,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (1), 3–9.
72.
MartinKelly D.JosephsonBrett W.VadakkepattGautham G.JohnsonJean L. (2018), “Political Management, Research and Development, and Advertising Capital in the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Good Prognosis?” Journal of Marketing, 82 (3), 87–107.
73.
MazutisDaina D.SlawinskiNatalie (2015), “Reconnecting Business and Society: Perceptions of Authenticity in Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics, 131 (1), 137–50.
74.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles (1996), “To Map Contentious Politics,” Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 1 (1), 17–34.
75.
McGeeJohn (1998), “Commentary on ‘Corporate Strategies and Environmental Regulations: An Organizing Framework’ by A.M. Rugman and A. Verbeke,” Strategic Management Journal, 19 (4), 377–87.
76.
McShaneLindsayCunninghamPeggy (2012), “To Thine Own Self Be True? Employees’ Judgments of the Authenticity of Their Organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility Program,” Journal of Business Ethics, 108 (1), 81–100.
77.
McWilliamsAbagailSiegelDonald (2001), “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 117–27.
78.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian (1977), “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340–63.
MukherjeeSourjoAlthuizenNiek (2020), “Brand Activism: Does Courting Controversy Help or Hurt a Brand?” International Journal of Research in Marketing(published online March 13), DOI:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.02.008.
81.
MullerAlan R.PfarrerMichael D.LittleLaura M. (2014), “A Theory of Collective Empathy in Corporate Philanthropy Decisions,” Academy of Management Review, 39 (1), 1–21.
82.
NikolaevaRalitzaBichoMarta (2011), “The Role of Institutional and Reputational Factors in the Voluntary Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Standards,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (1), 136–57.
83.
NolanJessica M.SchultzP.WesleyCialdiniRobert B.GoldsteinNoah J.GriskeviciusVladas (2008), “Normative Social Influence Is Underdetected,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (7), 913–23.
84.
OliverChristineHolzingerIngo (2008), “The Effectiveness of Strategic Political Management: A Dynamic Capabilities Framework,” Academy of Management Review, 33 (2), 496–520.
PayanJanice M.McFarlandRichard G. (2005), “Decomposing Influence Strategies: Argument Structure and Dependence as Determinants of the Effectiveness of Influence Strategies in Gaining Channel Member Compliance,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), 66–79.
87.
PedersenEsben Rahbek GjerdrumNeergaardPeterPedersenJanni ThusgaardGwozdzWencke (2013), “Conformance and Deviance: Company Responses to Institutional Pressures for Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting,” Business Strategy and the Environment, 22 (6), 357–73.
88.
PelozaJohnShangJingzhi (2011), “How Can Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Create Value for Stakeholders? A Systematic Review,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (1), 117–35.
89.
PomerantzEva M.ChaikenShellyTordesillasRosalind S. (1995), “Attitude Strength and Resistance Processes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (3), 408–19.
90.
PorteousAngharad H.RammohanSonali V.LeeHau L. (2015), “Carrots or Sticks? Improving Social and Environmental Compliance at Suppliers Through Incentives and Penalties,” Production and Operations Management, 24 (9), 1402–13.
91.
PrataNdolaTavrowPaulaUpadhyayUshma (2017), “Women’s Empowerment Related to Pregnancy and Childbirth: Introduction to Special Issue,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17 (2), 352.
92.
PriceJoseph M.SunWenbin (2017), “Doing Good and Doing Bad: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility on Firm Performance,” Journal of Business Research, 80, 82–97.
93.
RaeburnNicole C. (2004), Changing Corporate America from Inside Out: Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
RobinDonald P.ReidenbachR.Eric (1987), “Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (1), 44–58.
ScottW. Richard (1995), Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
99.
SenSankarBhattacharyaChitra Bhanu (2001), “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), 225–43.
100.
SenSankarGürhan-CanliZeynepMorwitzVicki (2001), “Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (3), 399–417.
101.
SharmaSanjayHenriquesIrene (2005), “Stakeholder Influences on Sustainability Practices in the Canadian Forest Products Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, 26 (2), 159–80.
102.
SmithJackie (2005), “Globalization and Transnational Social Movement Organizations,” in Social Movements and Organization Theory, DavisGerald F.McAdamDougScottW. RichardZaidMayer N., eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 226–48.
103.
StephanUtePattersonMalcolmKellyCiaraMairJohanna (2016), “Organizations Driving Positive Social Change: A Review and an Integrative Framework of Change Processes.” Journal of Management, 42 (5), 1250–81.
104.
SuchmanMark C. (1995), “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571–610.
105.
SwimbergheKristFlurryLaura A.ParkerJanna M. (2011), “Consumer Religiosity: Consequences for Consumer Activism in the United States,” Journal of Business Ethics, 103 (3), 453–67.
WagnerTillmannLutzRichard J.WeitzBarton A. (2009), “Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (6), 77–91.
110.
WaldronTheodore L.NavisChadFisherGreg (2013), “Explaining Differences in Firms’ Responses to Activism,” Academy of Management Review, 38 (3), 397–417.
