The authors examine some potential effects of changes in nutrition labels associated with the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990. They report a study in which effects of basic label format, inclusion of nutrition reference values, perceived nutritiousness of the product, and nutrition knowledge are examined. As hypothesized, results indicate that awareness of whether the product contains more than recommended amounts of negative nutrients (e.g., cholesterol, saturated fat) differs across formats. Also as postulated, inclusion of reference values and higher levels of nutrition knowledge results in higher reported purchase likelihood for a product that is perceived as highly nutritious and lower purchase likelihood for a product with low perceived nutritiousness. They conclude with implications of these results for public policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenIcek, and FishbeinMartin (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
2.
AlbaJoseph W., and Wesley HutchinsonJ. (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(March), 411–54.
3.
BrownVernon, KelleyCraig, and LeeMing Tung (1991), “The State of the Art in Labeling Research Revisited: Developments in Labeling Research 1978–1990,” in Proceedings of the 1991 AMA Summer Educators’ Conference, GillyMary, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association: 717–25.
4.
BracksMerrie, MitchellAndrew A., and StaelinRichard (1984), “The Effect of Nutritional Information Disclosure in Advertising: An Information Processing Approach,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 3, 1–25.
5.
ColeCatherine A., and GaethGary J. (1990), “Cognitive and Age-related Differences in the Ability to Use Nutritional Information in a Complex Environment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37(May), 175–84.
Della BittaAlbert J., Monroe KentB., and McGinnisJohn M. (1981). “Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18(November), 416–27.
8.
Dietary Guidelines for Americans (1990). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
9.
Federal Register (1990), “Food Labeling, Reference Daily Intakes and Daily Reference Values,”55 (139), 29476–86.
10.
Federal Register (1993), “Food Labeling Regulations Implementing the Nutritional Labeling and Education Act of 1990,”58 (January 6), 2066–190.
11.
FeinSara B., DerbyBrenda M., and LevyAlan S. (1992), “Consumers’ Abilities to Use Food Labels: Implications for Education,” presentation to American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
12.
HainesG. H. (1974), “A Prologue to Four Papers on Information Search,” in Buyer/Consumer Information Processing, HughesG., and RayM., eds. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
13.
HeimbachJames T., and StokesRaymond C. (1982), “Nutrition Labeling and Public Health: Survey of American Institute of Nutrition Members, Food Industry, and Consumers,”American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 36, 700–708.
14.
IppolitoP., and MathiosA. (1990), “Information, Advertising, and Health Choices: A Study of the Cereal Market,”Rand Journal of Economics, 21(3), 459–80.
15.
IppolitoP., and MathiosA. (1991), “Health Claims in Food Marketing: Evidence on Knowledge and Behavior in the Cereal Market,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(Spring), 15–32.
16.
JacobyJacob, ChestnutRichard W., and SilbermanWilliam (1977), “Consumer Use and Comprehension of Nutrition Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 4(September), 119–28.
17.
JacobyJacob, SpellerDonald E., and BerningCarol K. (1974), “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension,”Journal of Consumer Research, 1(June), 33–42.
18.
KellerKevin L., and StaelinRichard (1987), “Effects on Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(September), 200–213.
19.
LevyAlan S., FeinSara B., and SchuckerRaymond E. (1992), “A Study of Nutrition Label Formats: Performance and Preference,”Food Technology, 45(July), 116–21.
20.
LevyAlan S., FeinSara B., and SchuckerRaymond E. (1993), “Evaluation of Nutrition Label Formats: FDA Study 2,” Division of Consumer Studies, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.
21.
LichtensteinDonald R., BurtonScot, and KarsonEric (1991), “The Effect of Semantic Cues on Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements,”Journal of Consumer Research, 18(December), 55–66.
22.
MalhotraNaresh K. (1982), “Information Load and Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 8(March), 419–30.
23.
MizerskiRichard W. (1982), “An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9(December), 301–10.
24.
MoormanChristine (1990), “The Effects of Stimulus and Consumer Characteristics on the Utilization of Nutrition Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17(December), 362–74.
25.
MuellerWilliam (1991), “Who Reads the Label?”American Demographics (January), 36–41.
26.
MullerThomas E. (1985), “Structural Information Factors Which Stimulate the Use of Nutrition Information: A Field Experiment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22(May), 143–47.
27.
Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–535), 21 USC 301 (November 8, 1990).
RussoJ. Edward (1974), “More Information Is Better: A Reevaluation of Jacoby, Speller, and Kohn,”Journal of Consumer Research, 1(December), 68–72.
30.
RussoJ. Edward, StaelinRichard, NolanCatherine A., RussellGary J., and MetcalfBarbara L. (1986), “Nutrition Information in the Supermarket,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(June), 48–70.
31.
ScammonDebra L. (1977), “Information Load and Consumers,”Journal of Consumer Research, 4(December), 148–55.
32.
SchoenfeldAllen H., and HermanD. J. (1982), “Problem, Perception and Knowledge Structure in Expert and Novice Mathematical Problem Solvers,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(September) 484–94.
33.
TverskyAmos, and KahnemanDaniel (1981), “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,”Science, 211(January), 453–58.
34.
WilkieWilliam L. (1974), “Analysis of Effects of Information Load,”Journal of Marketing Research, 11(November), 462–66.
