A novel composite material has been developed from natural rubber and leather waste, and a corresponding patent has been filed. This new material may be incorporated into textile and footwear products. However, as leather waste contains chromium, the biocompatibility of this new material and its safety for use in humans must be investigated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the presence of chromium in this new material, determine the amount of each form of chromium present (trivalent or hexavalent), and evaluate the potential cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of the novel composite in two cell lines. The cellular viability was quantified using the MTT3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide reduction method and neutral red uptake assay, and genotoxic damage was analyzed using the comet assay. Our findings indicated that the extracts obtained from the composite were severely cytotoxic to both cell lines tested, and additionally highly genotoxic to MRC-5 cells. These biological responses do not appear to be attributable to the presence of chromium, as the trivalent form was predominantly found to be present in the extracts, indicating that hexavalent chromium is not formed during the production of the novel composite. The incorporation of this new material in applications that do not involve direct contact with the human skin is thus indicated, and it is suggested that the chain of production of this material be studied in order to improve its biocompatibility so that it may safely be used in the textile and footwear industries.
AbrahamASBrooksBAEylathU (1992) The effects of chromium supplementation on serum glucose and lipids in patients with and without non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Metabolism41: 768–771.
2.
AbrahamEKRameshPJosephR. (2005) Release of dithiocarbamates into sweat from natural rubber latex surgical gloves. Rubber Chemistry and Technology78: 674–681.
3.
AndersonDYuT-WMcGregorDB (1998) Comet assay responses as indicators of carcinogenic exposure. Mutagenesis13: 539–555.
4.
ASTM F619 (2014) Standard practice for extraction of medical plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.
5.
CabezaLFTaylorMMDiMaioGL. (1998) Processing of leather waste: pilot scale studies on chrome shavings. Isolation of potentially valuable protein products and chromium. Waste Management18: 211–218.
6.
CamposVEHanadaSHigaOZ. (1999) Toxicological evaluation of natural rubber latex film vulcanized with ionizing radiation. 7 General Congress on Nuclear Energy, Brazil. Available at: https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:30041699.
7.
ChaudharyRPatiA (2016) Poultry feed based on protein hydrolysate derived from chrome-tanned leather solid waste: creating value from waste. Environmental Science and Pollution Research23: 8120–8124.
8.
ChielliniF (2006) Perspectives on: in vitro evaluation of biomedical polymers. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers21: 257–271.
9.
DjouinaMEsquerreNDesreumauxP. (2016) Toxicological consequences of experimental exposure to aluminum in human intestinal epithelial cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology91: 108–116.
10.
D’SouzaPVijayalaxmiKKNaikP (2014) Assessment of genotoxicity of aluminium acetate in bone marrow, male germ cells and fetal liver cells of Swiss albino mice. Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis766: 16–22.
11.
García-MedinaSRazo-EstradaCGalar-MartínezM. (2011) Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects induced by aluminum in the lymphocytes of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology – Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology153: 113–118.
12.
GeniesCMaıtreALefebvreE. (2013) The extreme variety of genotoxic response to benzo[a]pyrene in three different human cell lines from three different organs. PLoS ONE8(11): e78356.
13.
GomesACMoraesLCKSilvaMJ (2010) Caracterização de resíduo de curtume para determinação de disposição final. Omnia Exatas3: 33–40.
14.
HendersonLWolfreysAFedykJ. (1998) The ability of the Comet assay to discriminate between genotoxins and cytotoxins. Mutagenesis13: 89–94.
15.
HiningerIBenarabaROsmanM. (2007) Safety of trivalent chromium complexes: no evidence for DNA damage in human HaCaT keratinocytes. Free Radical Biology and Medicine42: 1759–1765.
16.
Ingre-KhansERudénCBreitholtzM (2010) Chemical risks and consumer products: the toxicity of shoe soles. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety73: 1633–1640.
17.
IPPC Directive (2013) Reference Document for the Tanning of Hides and Skins: Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU: (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control). Available at: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/tan.html
18.
KlungsupyaPSuthepakulNMuangmanT. (2015) Determination of free radical scavenging, antioxidative DNA damage activities and phytochemical components of active fractions from Lansium domesticum Corr. fruit. Nutrients7: 6852–6873.
19.
KobayashiHSuguyamaCMorikawaY. (1995) A comparison between manual microscopic analysis and computerized image analysis in the single cell gel electrophoresis. MMS Communications3: 103–115.
20.
LiuMMaJLyuB. (2016) Enhancement of chromium uptake in tanning process of goat garment leather using nanocomposite. Journal of Cleaner Production133: 487–494.
21.
LönnrothEC (2005) Toxicity of medical glove materials: a pilot study. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics11: 131–139.
22.
LuYXuDZhouJMaY. (2013) Differential responses to genotoxic agents between induced pluripotent stem cells and tumor cell lines. Journal of Hematology & Oncology6: 71.
23.
MilmanBL (2011) Chemical Identification and Its Quality Assurance. Germany: Springer.
24.
MishraSBharagavaRN (2016) Toxic and genotoxic effects of hexavalent chromium in environment and its bioremediation strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C: Environmental Carcinogenesis and Ecotoxicology34: 1.
25.
MosmannT (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. Journal of Immunological Methods65: 55–63.
NielsenFH (2014) Should bioactive trace elements not recognized as essential, but with beneficial health effects, have intake recommendations. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology28: 406–408.
28.
PachecoJWF (2005) Curtumes. São Paulo: CETESB, p. 76.
29.
PatiAChaudharyRSubramaniS (2014) A review on management of chrome-tanned leather shavings: a holistic paradigm to combat the environmental issues. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International21: 11266–11282.
PonzinibbioMVCrudeliCMiraA. (2008) Comparison of the effects of low doses of X-rays in two cell lines. Biocell32: 134.
32.
PriebeGPSKipperaEGusmãoAL. (2016) Anaerobic digestion of chrome-tanned leather waste for biogas production. Journal of Cleaner Production129: 410–416.
33.
ReisEAP (2010) Preparation and characterization of composites obtained by mixture of natural rubber with scrapes of leather seeking industrial application. Master’s Dissertation, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,”Brazil.
34.
RepettoGdel PesoAZuritaJ L (2008) Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nature Protocols3: 1125–1131.
35.
RoyKAlamMNMandalSK. (2015) Preparation of zinc-oxide-free natural rubber nanocomposites using nanostructured magnesium oxide as cure activator. Journal of Applied Polymer Science132: 42705.
36.
SahaRNandiRSahaB (2011) Sources and toxicity of hexavalent chromium. Journal of Coordination Chemistry64: 1782–1806.
37.
ShekhawatKChatterjeeSJoshiB (2015) Chromium toxicity and its health hazards. International Journal of Advanced Research3: 167–172.
38.
SinghNPMcCoyMTTiceRR. (1988) A single technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research175: 184–191.
39.
SwethaBMathewSSreenivasa MurthyBV. (2015) determination of biocompatibility: a review. International Dental & Medical Journal of Advanced Research1: 1–6.
40.
TiceRRAgurellEAndersonD. (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis35: 206–221.
41.
TongJWangYLuY (2016) In vitro evaluation of inorganic and methyl mercury mediated cytotoxic effect on neural cells derived from different animal species. Journal of Environmental Sciences41: 138–145.
42.
van MeerlooJKaspersGJCloosJ (2011) Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay. Methods in Molecular Biology731: 237–245.
43.
YoungJLWiseSSXieH. (2015) Comparative cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of soluble and particulate hexavalent chromium in human and hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) skin cells. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology178: 145–155.
