Methylmercury in fish from the southern Baltic Sea and coastal lagoons as a function of species,size,and region

Abstract

Background:

Methylmercury (MeHg) is a highly toxic compound that traverses the blood–brain barrier with deleterious effects to the central nervous system. Exposure is generally through the ingestion of contaminated fish. Fish are a main source of MeHg.

Goals and methods:

The aim of this study was to determine the dependence of MeHg concentrations on fish species and age, the percentage of MeHg in total mercury (THg) and risk assessment depending on the size of fish. Assays of THg and MeHg were performed on the muscle tissues of 18 species of fish.

Results:

The investigations indicated there were differences in the mercury concentrations depending on fish size. THg and MeHg concentrations in the muscles of fish species that have a wide length distribution were strongly, positively correlated with fish length. However, concentrations of MeHg were strongly, positively correlated with those of THg in all the fish species investigated. Variation in the percentage share of MeHg in THg in the muscles of fish of large sizes was also noted within species, but this correlation was not noted in small-sized fish. The dose of MeHg in small-sized fish species was estimated and the risk posed to consumer health was assessed using mean MeHg concentrations determined for different fish species.

Conclusions:

For species of fish that occur within a wide length distribution, the dose of MeHg should be assessed separately in different length classes. Fish consumption of small-sized species poses no health risk.

Keywords

Fish methylmercury risk assessment total mercury

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

Jessick

Palacio

. (2012) Methylmercury concentrations in six fish species from two Colombia Rivers. Bulletin Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 88: 65–68.

Baeyens

Leermakers

Papina

. (2003) Bioconcentration and biomagnification of mercury and methylmercury in North Sea and Scheldt Estuary fish. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 45: 498–508.

Barska

Skrzyński

(2003) Contents of methylmercury and total mercury in Baltic fish and fish products. Bulletin Sea Fisheries Institute 3(160): 1–15.

Bermejo

(2007) Fish age classification based on length, weight, sex and otolith morphological features. Fisheries Research 84: 270–274.

Bjornberg

Vahter

Petersson-Grawe

. (2003) Methyl mercury and inorganic mercury in Swedish pregnant women and in cord blood: influence of fish consumption. Environmental Health Perspectives 111: 637–641.

Bonsignore

Salvagio

Oliveri

. (2013) Mercury in fishes from Augusta Bay (Southern Italy): risk assessment and health implication. Food Chemistry and Toxicology 56: 148–194.

Cabanero

Madrid

Camara

(2004) Selenium and mercury bioaccessibility in fish samples: an in vitro digestion method. Analytica Chimica Acta 526: 51–61.

Cabanero

Madrid

Camara

(2007) Mercury–selenium species ratio in representative fish samples and their bioaccessibility by an in vitro digestion method. Biological Trace Elements Research 119: 195–211.

Chen

Amirbahman

Fisher

. (2008) Methylmercury in marine ecosystems: spatial patterns and processes of production, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification. EcoHealth 5: 399–408.

10.

EFSA (2012) Scientific Opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food (CONTAM). EFSA Journal 10(12): 2985. Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2985.pdf (accessed 15 December 2016).

11.

Failler

Van De Wavle

Lecrivain

. (2007) Future Prospects for Fish and Fishery Products. Fish Consumption I the European Union in 2015 and 2030. European overview FAO Fisheries circular 972/4, Part 1. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-ah947e.pdf (accessed 14 December 2016).

12.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization) (2005) Statistical Databases. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org (accessed 21 December 2016).

13.

Wang

(2011) Factors affecting the bioaccessibility of methylmercury in several marine fish species. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry 59: 7155–7162.

14.

Kehrig

Howard

Malm

(2008) Methylmercury in a predatory fish (Cichla spp.) inhabiting the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Pollution 154: 68–76.

15.

Kehrig

Tércia

Seixas

. (2010). Inorganic and methylmercury: do they transfer along a tropical coastal food web? Marine Pollution Bulletin 60: 2350–2356.

16.

Kubala

Moellers

Schoeberl

. (2011) Survey of methylmercury in fish and seafood from the southwestern German market. European Food Research Technology 232: 737–742.

17.

Kwaśniak

Falkowska

Kwaśniak

(2012) The assessment of organic mercury in Baltic fish by use of an in vitro digestion model. Food Chemistry 132: 752–758.

18.

Laird

Shade

Gantner

. (2009) Bioaccessibility of mercury from traditional northern country foods, measured using an in vitro gastrointestinal model, is independent of mercury concentration. Science of The Total Environment 407: 6003–6008.

19.

Magalhaes

Costa

Gui

. (2007) Intra- and inter-specific variability in total and methylmercury bioaccumulation by eight marine fish species from the Azores. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54: 1654–1662.

20.

Maggi

Berducci

Bianchi

. (2009) Methylmercury determination in marine sediment and organisms by direct mercury analyzer. Analytica Chimica Acta 641: 32–36.

21.

Marrugo-Negrete

Verbel

Ceballos

. (2008) Total mercury and methylmercury concentrations in fish from the Magana region of Colombia. Environmental Geochemistry Health 30: 21–30.

22.

Mason

Heyes

Sveinsdottir

(2006) Methylmercury concentrations in fish from tidal waters of the Chesapeake Bay. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 51: 425–437.

23.

Quedrago

Amyot

(2013) Mercury, arsenic and selenium concentrations in water and fish from Sub-Saharan semi-arid freshwater reservoirs (Burkina Faso). Science of The Total Environment 444: 243–254.

24.

Pieńkowska

Hryszko

(2013) The consumption of fish. Fish market - state and perspectives. In: IER and GZ-PIB (eds) Market Analysis. (In Polish) Spożycie ryb w Rynek ryb – stan i perspektywy. Analizy rynkowe. Warszawa: Wyd. IER i GZ-PIB, pp. 26–31.

25.

Polak-Juszczak

(2015) Selenium and mercury molar ratios in commercial fish from the Baltic Sea: additional risk assessment criterion for mercury exposure. Food Control 50: 881–888.

26.

Polak-Juszczak

Robak

(2015) Mercury toxicity and the protective role of selenium in eel, Anguilla anguilla. Environmental Science Pollution Research 22: 679–688.

27.

Ralston

NVC

(2008) Selenium health benefit values as seafood safety criteria. EcoHealth 5: 442–455.

28.

Ralston

NVC

Raymond

(2010) Dietary selenium’s protective effects against methylmercury toxicity. Toxicology 278: 112–123.

29.

Rivera

Pacheco

Acha

. (2016) Low total mercury in Caiman yacare (Alligatoridae) as compared to carnivorous, and non-carnivorous fish consumed by Amazonian indigenous communities. Environmental Pollution 218: 366–371. Available at: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.013.

30.

Siedlikowski

Bradley

Kubowa

. (2016) Bioaccessibility and bioavailability of methylmercury from seafood commonly consumed in North America: In vitro and epidemiological studies. Environmental Research 149: 266–273.

31.

Tong

Zhang

. (2012) Model description of trophodynamic behavior of methylmercury in marine aquatic system. Environmental Pollution 166: 89–97.

32.

Wang

Chen

. (2013) In vitro estimation of exposure of Hong Kong residents to mercury and methylmercury via consumption of market fishes. Journal of Hazard Material 248: 387–393.

33.

Yamashita

Omura

Okazaki

(2005) Total mercury and methylmercury levels in commercially important fishes in Japan. Fisheries Science 71: 1029–1035.