The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential influence of occupational ionizing radiation (IR) exposure on health professionals, assessing DNA damage using the comet and micronucleus (MN) assays and analyzing relative risks, correlations, and associated factors between outcomes and socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. Blood and buccal samples were collected from 36 workers, who actively participated in an imaging sector of a hospital, who were either exposed to IR directly or indirectly (9 internal control and 27 exposed), and 27 individuals living in the same city but with no occupational exposure (external control, unexposed/healthy). All radiation dosages performed on the 36 workers were less than 20 mSv/y, not exceeding the effective dose limit for occupational exposure. A questionnaire identified socioeconomic and lifestyle factors associated with the outcomes. The results of the MN assay showed a significant difference between both internal control and the exposed group when compared to the external control. For the comet assay, there were significant differences between the percent of tail DNA of the exposed group and external controls, but no difference was found between the exposed group and internal controls. Relative risk associations were found in time of exposure, hours worked per week, and perceived stress. Correlations were found between the outcomes and age, consumption of alcohol, and frequencies of X-rays during life. Variables that showed to be significant in the adjusted analysis were skin color and recent exposure to radiation. Albeit limited, the findings of this study suggest genotoxicity in both blood and buccal mucosa cells of workers exposed directly or indirectly to IR and that lifestyle and socioeconomic factors are associated and correlated with the risk of developing these outcomes.
ABEP (2015) Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil - CCEB. Códigos e guias.
2.
Aguiar TorresLdos Santos RodriguesALinharesD, et al. (2019) Buccal epithelial cell micronuclei: sensitive, non-invasive biomarkers of occupational exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research – Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis838: 54–58.
3.
AndreassiMGFoffaIManfrediS, et al. (2009) Genetic polymorphisms in XRCC1, OGG1, APE1 and XRCC3 DNA repair genes, ionizing radiation exposure and chromosomal DNA damage in interventional cardiologists. Mutation Research – Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis18(666): 57–63.
4.
AngeliniSKumarRCarboneF, et al. (2005) Micronuclei in humans induced by exposure to low level of ionizing radiation: influence of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes. Mutation Research – Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis517(1): 105–117.
5.
BalakrishnanSRaoSB (1999) Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes of occupational workers exposed to low levels of ionising radiation. Mutation Research – Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis442(1): 37–42.
6.
BarquineroJFBarriosLCaballínMR, et al. (1993) Cytogenetic analysis of lymphocytes from hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research – Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis286(2): 275–279.
7.
BazykaDFinchSCIlienkoIM, et al. (2017) Buccal mucosa micronuclei counts in relation to exposure to low dose-rate radiation from the Chernobyl nuclear accident and other medical and occupational radiation exposures. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source16(1): 70.
8.
BenhamouSSarasinA (2000) Variability in nucleotide excision repair and cancer risk: a review. Mutation Research – Reviews in Mutation Research462(2–1): 149–158.
9.
BonassiSEl-ZeinRBolognesiC, et al. (2011). Micronuclei frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes and cancer risk: evidence from human studies. Mutagenesis, 26(1), 93–100.
10.
BonassiSZnaorACeppiM, et al. (2007) An increased micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer in humans. Carcinogenesis28(3): 625–631.
11.
BouraouiSMougouSDriraA, et al. (2013) A cytogenetic approach to the effects of low levels of ionizing radiation (IR) on the exposed Tunisian hospital workers. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health26(1): 144–154.
12.
BuitenhuisWFritschiLThomsonA, et al. (2013) Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and risk of breast cancer in Western Australia. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine55(12): 1431–1435.
13.
CardosoRSTakahashi-HyodoSPeitlP, et al. (2001) Evaluation of chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, and sister chromatid exchanges in hospital workers chronically exposed to ionizing radiation. Teratogenesis Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis21(6): 431–439.
14.
Caroline Di BernardiLSabrina de OliveiraSGiovana ZarpellonM, et al. (2007) Versão brasileira da Escala de Estresse Percebido: tradução e validação para idosos / Brazilian version of the Perceived Stress Scale: translation and validation for the elderly. Revista de Saúde Pública VO –41(4): 606–615.
15.
ChoYHKimYJAnYS, et al. (2009) Micronucleus-centromere assay and DNA repair gene polymorphism in lymphocytes of industrial radiographers. Mutation Research – Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis680(1–2): 17–24.
16.
CigarránSBarquineroJFBarriosL, et al. (2006) Cytogenetic analyses by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Radiation Research155(3): 417–423.
17.
CollinsAR (2004) The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology – Part B Molecular Biotechnology26(3):249–261.
18.
CookeMSEvansMDDizdarogluM, et al. (2003) Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease. The FASEB Journal17(10): 1195–1214.
19.
CrumpKSDuportPJiangH, et al. (2012) A meta-analysis of evidence for hormesis in animal radiation carcinogenesis, including a discussion of potential pitfalls in statistical analyses to detect hormesis. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health – Part B: Critical Reviews15(3): 210–231.
20.
Da Silva JúniorFMROleinskiRMAzevedoAE, et al. (2018a). Vulnerability associated with “symptoms similar to those of mercury poisoning” in communities from Xingu River, Amazon basin. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 40(3), 1145–1154.
21.
Da Silva JúniorFMRTavellaRAFernandesCLF, et al. (2018b) Genotoxicity in Brazilian coal miners and its associated factors. Human and Experimental Toxicology37(9): 891–900.
22.
Da Silva PintoEAGarciaEMde AlmeidaKA, et al. (2017) Genotoxicity in adult residents in mineral coal region—a cross-sectional study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research24(20): 16806–16814.
23.
DimriGBandHBandV (2005) Mammary epithelial cell transformation: insights from cell culture and mouse models. Breast Cancer Research7(4): 171.
24.
DobrzyńskaMMPachockiKAGajowikA, et al. (2014) The effect occupational exposure to ionizing radiation on the DNA damage in peripheral blood leukocytes of nuclear medicine personnel. Journal of Occupational Health56(5): 379–386.
25.
DoukaliHBen SalahGBen RhoumaB, et al. (2017a) Cytogenetic monitoring of hospital staff exposed to ionizing radiation: optimize protocol considering DNA repair genes variability. International Journal of Radiation Biology93(11): 1283–1288.
26.
DoukaliHBen SalahGBen RhoumaB, et al. (2017b) Cytogenetic monitoring of hospital staff exposed to ionizing radiation: optimize protocol considering DNA repair genes variability. International Journal of Radiation Biology93(11). Taylor & Francis.
27.
FairbairnDWOlivePLO’NeillKL (1995) The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology339(1): 37–59.
28.
FenechMKirsch-VoldersMNatarajanAT, et al. (2011) Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells. Mutagenesis26(1): 125–132.
29.
FenechMPerepetskayaGMikhalevichL (1997) A more comprehensive application of the micronucleus technique for biomonitoring of genetic damage rates in human populations-experiences from the Chernobyl catastrophe. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis30(2): 112–118.
30.
GaetaniSMonacoFBracciM, et al. (2018) DNA damage response in workers exposed to low-dose ionising radiation. Occupational and Environmental Medicine75(10): 724–729.
31.
GalhardoRSHastingsPJRosenbergSM (2007) Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology42(5): 399–435.
32.
Garaj-VrhovacVKopjarN (2003) The alkaline Comet assay as biomarker in assessment of DNA damage in medical personnel occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation. Mutagenesis18(3): 265–271.
33.
Garaj-VrhovacVOreščaninV (2009) Assessment of DNA sensitivity in peripheral blood leukocytes after occupational exposure to microwave radiation: the alkaline comet assay and chromatid breakage assay. Cell Biology and Toxicology25(1): 33–43.
34.
GüerciAMGrilloCADuloutFN, et al. (2006) Assessment of genotoxic damage in lymphocytes of hospital workers exposed to ionizing radiation in Argentina. Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health61(4): 163–169.
35.
HollandNBolognesiCKirsch-VoldersM, et al. (2008) The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for biomonitoring DNA damage: the HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps. Mutation Research – Reviews in Mutation Research659(1-2): 93–108.
36.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2011) Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. Manual Series.
37.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2014) Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards (GSR Part 3). Basic Safety Standards.
38.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP.
39.
JacksonSPBartekJ (2009) The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature461: 1071–1078.
40.
JosephLJPatwardhanUNSamuelAM (2004) Frequency of micronuclei in peripheral blood lymphocytes from subjects occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research – Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis564(1): 83–88.
41.
KassieFParzefallWKnasmüllerS (2000) Single cell gel electrophoresis assay: a new technique for human biomonitoring studies. Mutation Research – Reviews in Mutation Research463(1): 13–31.
42.
KažimírováABarančokováMDžupinkováZ, et al. (2009) Micronuclei and chromosomal aberrations, important markers of ageing: possible association with XPC and XPD polymorphisms. Mutation Research – Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis661(1–2): 35–40.
43.
KopjarNGaraj-VrhovacV (2005) Assessment of DNA damage in nuclear medicine personnel—comparative study with the alkaline comet assay and the chromosome aberration test. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health208(3): 179–191.
44.
KumarDKumariSSalianSR, et al. (2015) Genetic instability in lymphocytes is associated with blood plasma antioxidant levels in health care workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation. International Journal of Toxicology35(3): 327–335.
45.
LalićHRadosević-StasićB (2002) Chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes in subjects occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation or chemical clastogens. Folia biologica48(3): 102–107.
46.
MaffeiFAngeliniSFortiGC, et al. (2004) Spectrum of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of hospital workers occupationally exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research – Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis547(1–2): 91–99.
47.
MalufSWPassosDFBacelarA, et al. (2001) Assessment of DNA damage in lymphocytes of workers exposed to X-radiation using the micronucleus test and the comet assay. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis38(4): 311–315.
48.
McKennaDJMcKeownSRMcKelvey-MartinVJ (2008) Potential use of the comet assay in the clinical management of cancer. Mutagenesis23(3): 183–190.
49.
OlinskiRGackowskiDFoksinskiM, et al. (2002) Oxidative DNA damage: assessment of the role in carcinogenesis, atherosclerosis, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Free Radical Biology and Medicine33(2): 192–200.
50.
OlivePL (1999) DNA damage and repair in individual cells: applications of the comet assay in radiobiology. International Journal of Radiation Biology75(4): 395–405.
51.
PreethiNChikkanarasaiahNBethurSS (2016) Genotoxic effects of X-rays in buccal mucosal cells in children subjected to dental radiographs. BDJ Open26(2): 16001.
52.
PrinceA (1993) The repair of ionising radiation-induced damage to DNA. Seminars in Cancer Biology4(3): 61–71.
53.
QianQZCaoXKShenFH, et al. (2016) Effects of ionising radiation on micronucleus formation and chromosomal aberrations in Chinese radiation workers. Radiation Protection Dosimetry168(2): 197–203.
54.
SahinATatarAOztasS, et al. (2009) Evaluation of the genotoxic effects of chronic low-dose ionizing radiation exposure on nuclear medicine workers. Nuclear Medicine and Biology36(5): 575–578.
55.
SaklyAGasparJFKerkeniE, et al. (2012) Genotoxic damage in hospital workers exposed to ionizing radiation and metabolic gene polymorphisms. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health – Part A: Current Issues75(13–15): 934–946.
56.
Sari-MinodierIOrsièreTAuquierP, et al. (2007) Cytogenetic monitoring by use of the micronucleus assay among hospital workers exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research – Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis629(2): 111–121.
57.
ShakeriMZakeriFChangiziV, et al. (2017) A cytogenetic biomonitoring of industrial radiographers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation by using CBMN assay. Radiation Protection Dosimetry175(2): 246–251.
58.
SinghNPMcCoyMTTiceRR, et al. (1988) A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research175(1): 184–191.
59.
SinghNPStephensRESchneiderEL (1994) Modifications of alkaline microgel electrophoresis for sensitive detection of DNA damage. International Journal of Radiation Biology66(1): 23–28.
60.
ThierensHVralADe RidderL (1996) A cytogenetic study of radiological workers: effect of age, smoking and radiation burden on the micronucleus frequency. Mutation Research – Environmental Mutagenesis and Related Subjects360(2): 75–82.
61.
ThierensHVralAMorthierR, et al. (2000) Cytogenetic monitoring of hospital workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation using the micronucleus centromere assay. Mutagenesis15(3): 245–249.
62.
TiceRRAndrewsPWHiraiO, et al. (1991) The single cell gel (SCG) assay: an electrophoretic technique for the detection of DNA damage in individual cells. 283(1): 157–164.
63.
ÜndeǧerÜZorluAFBaşaranN (1999) Use of the alkaline comet assay to monitor DNA damage in technicians exposed to low-dose radiation. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine41(8): 693–698.
64.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: Volume I. New York: UNSCEAR.
65.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2008) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York: UNSCEAR.
66.
VaisermanAM (2010) Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment. Dose-Response8(2): 172–191.
67.
ValentinJ (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Oxford: Elsevier37(2-4): 1–133.
68.
WojewódzkaMKruszewskiMIwaneñkoT, et al. (1998) Application of the comet assay for monitoring DNA damage in workers exposed to chronic low-dose irradiation I. Strand breakage. Mutation Research – Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis416(1–2): 21–35.
69.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research.
70.
ZakeriFHirobeT (2010) A cytogenetic approach to the effects of low levels of ionizing radiations on occupationally exposed individuals. European Journal of Radiology73(1): 191–195.
