Aesthetic Primary and Secondary Breast Augmentation: Proposed Algorithm for Optimal Cosmetic Outcomes While Minimizing Complications

Abstract

Introduction:

The American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery does not have published guidelines on cosmetic primary and secondary breast surgery. Since augmentation-mastopexy is a common source of litigation, a guiding algorithm would be of benefit.

Materials and methods:

PubMed literature search was performed on each topic of cosmetic primary and secondary breast surgery. Articles were assessed for clinical relevance and the author referenced those deemed most representative of each topic area. In addition, the author’s clinical experience is presented.

Results:

Level of scientific evidence in clinical studies guide treatment recommendations, however, the quality of the cumulative clinical data less commonly reach a strong recommendation. The Aesthetic Society of Plastic Surgery publishes practice parameters, practice guidelines, policy statements, and performance measurement sets regarding breast augmentation and augmentation-mastopexy, many are not updated. Comparing these statements and different breast study results with their authors conclusions, identifies multiple points of view and controversies regarding virtually every aspect of the cosmetic breast surgical conundrum.

Discussion:

The cosmetic breast surgical plan starts with the initial patient request for breast enhancement, the breast and chest wall physical examination, and a detailed aesthetic consultation, which reviews all the variables to achieve the patient’s goals and guides the treatment plan regarding all clinical decisions.

Dealing with breast augmentation variables:

Size and projection determination, silicone gel cohesiveness, plane of implant placement, incision site, technique of placement, and when to use scaffolds, is presented in different clinical situations of those presenting for primary or secondary breast augmentation. Presented breast fat grafting techniques incorporates much of the current knowledge of harvesting, processing, enrichment, and administration that has yielded superior adipocyte survival and more consistent breast enhancement results. Mastopexy caveats, techniques, risk avoidance strategies, and use of adjuvant procedures are presented. Optimizing the overall breast cosmetic outcome, while minimizing complications requires a detailed anatomic breast and body examination, insightful and though planning, comprehensive patient consultation and consent regarding the alternative options, use of adjuvant devices (funnels, scaffolding, energy-based systems), regimented surgical procedure steps, and close postoperative surveillance.

Conclusions:

This review uses a surgeon’s personal experience and published studies to construct a logical primary and secondary breast augmentation algorithm to guide cosmetic surgeons in preparing a surgical plan, performing a preoperative risk assessment, and establishing perioperative risk avoidance strategies. The ultimate judgment regarding the care of a particular patient must be made by an individual surgeon jointly with the patient, taking into consideration their preferences and desired aesthetic outcome.

Keywords

breast augmentation general cosmetic surgery fat augmentation mammoplasty mastopexy fat transfer general body contouring surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Statistical survey. Published 2020.

American Society of Plastic Surgeons. ASPS National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery procedural statistics. Published 2020.

Gabriel

Woods

O’Fallon

, et al. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:677-682.

Marotta

Widenhouse

Habal

Goldberg

EP.

Silicone gel breast implant failure and frequency of additional surgeries: analysis of 35 studies reporting examination of more than 8,000 cc explants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;48:354-364.

Brown

Pennello

Replacement surgery and silicone gel breast implant rupture: self-report by women after mammoplasty. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002;11(3):255-264.

Troell

Breast fat grafting: ten-year learned clinical experience. Am J Cosm Surg. 2024;41:196-213.

Troell

Breast fat grafting: comparing filtration-centrifugation to filtration-washing fat processing. Am J Cosm Surg. 2024;41(2):100-112.

Food and Drug Administration. Update on questions and answers about breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) (FDA Statement). Published 2019. Accessed January 13, 2025. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/questions-and-answers-about-breast-implant-associated-anaplastic-large-cell-lymphoma-bia-alcl

American Society of Plastic Surgery statement on Breast implant associated-squamous cell carcinoma (BIA-SCC). Published September 2022. Accessed January 13, 2025. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/for-medical-professionals/publications/psn-extra/news/asps-statement-on-breast-implant-associated-squamous-cell-carcinoma

10.

Suh

Khan

Kelley-Patteson

Mohan

Hassanein

Sinha

Breast implant-associated immunological disorders. J Immunol Res. 2022;2022:8536149.

11.

Food and Drug Administration. Update on the safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants (FDA Statement). Published 2011.

12.

American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Practice parameter: treatment principles of silicone breast implants. Published March 2005.

13.

American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Practice guideline for breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Published 2011.

14.

Spring

Macias

Nadeau

Stevens

WG.

Secondary augmentation-mastopexy: indications, preferred practices, and the treatment of complications. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(7):1018-1040.

15.

Edwards

Gabriel

Hammer

Jewell

ML.

Gel cohesivity and breast augmentation: applications to clinical practice. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022;4:ojac088.

16.

Parikh

Gadiraju

Prospero

, et al. The impact of breast implant cohesivity on rippling and revision procedures in 2-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024;6:ojae028.

17.

Stevens

Spring

Stoker

, et al. A review of 100 consecutive secondary augmentation/mastopexies. Aesthet Surg J. 2007;27(5):485-492.

18.

Nava

Catanuto

Rocco

A decision- making method for breast augmentation based on 25 years of practice. Arch Plast Surg. 2018;45(2):196-203.

19.

Auclair

Anavekar

Combined use of implant and fat grafting for breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42(3):307-314, vii.

20.

Donfrancesco

Montemurro

Heden

Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patient’s satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:810-822.

21.

Lee

Kim

SH.

Transumbilical silicone breast augmentation: a 13-year experience and 5-year analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;48(18):3627-3636.

22.

Ryan

Haiavy

Patino

Transumbilical silicone breast augmentation: a practical review of an innovative technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;90(5):494-500.

23.

Namounm

Largent

Kaplan

Oefelein

Brown

MH.

Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2013;66:1165-1172.

24.

Perdikis

Dillingham

Boukovalas

, et al. American Society of Plastic Surgeons evidence-based clinical practice guideline revision: reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149:392e-409e.

25.

Jabs

Richards

FD.

Quantitative effects of tumescent infiltration and bupivacaine injection in decreasing postoperative pain in submuscular breast augmentation. Aesth Surg J. 2008;28:528-533.

26.

Rosaeg

Bell

Cicutti

Dennehy

Lui

ACP

Krepski

Pre-incision infiltration with lidocaine reduces pain an opioid consumption after reduction mammoplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:575-579.

27.

Nichols

Andrade

Gregoski

Herrera

Armstrong

MB.

Local infiltration of tranexamic acid in breast reduction for symptomatic macromastia. Annals Plast Surg. 2023;90(6S):S366-S370.

28.

Morkuzu

Ozdemir

Leach

Kanapathy

Mosahebi

Reid

CM.

Keller funnel efficacy in “no touch” breast augmentation and reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10(11):e4676.

29.

Patel

Martin

Cheesborough

Lee

Nazerali

RS.

The safety and efficacy of autologous fat grafting during second stage breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2020;74(4):792-799.

30.

Maheta

Yesantharao

Thawanyarat

Akhter

Rowley

Nazerali

RS.

Timing of autologous fat grafting in implant-based breast reconstruction: best practices based on systemic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2023;86:273-279.

31.

di Summa

Osinga

Sapino

, et al. Fat grafting versus implant-based treatment of breast asymmetry, a single surgeon experience over 13 years: a paradigm shift. Gland Surg. 2021;10(6):1920-1930.

32.

Ohashi

Yamakawa

Chiba

Nagano

Nakai

Our experience with 131 cases of simultaneous breast implant exchange with fat (SIEF). Plast Reconstr Surg Glo Open. 2016;4:1-8.

33.

Moncada

Nichols

Helium plasma-assisted breast reduction: a pilot study. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022;4:ojac041.

34.

Spear

Little

III . Breast capsulorrhaphy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81(2):274-279.

35.

Awaida

Paek

Danino

MA.

A new technique for breast pocket adjustment: argon beam thermal capsulorrhaphy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glo Open. 2022:10:e4437.

36.

Harris

Raphael

Harris

SW.

Thermal capsulorrhaphy: a modified technique for breast pocket revision. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(7):1041-1049.

37.

Munhoz

de Azevedo Marques Neto

Maximiliano

Reoperative augmentation mammoplasty: an algorithm to optimize soft-tissue support, pocket control, and smooth implant stability with composite reverse inferior muscle sling (CRIMS) and its technical variations. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;46(3):1116-1132.

38.

Stevens

Stoker

Freeman

Quardt

Hirsch

Cohen

Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? a review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(6):674-681.

39.

Spear

Pelletiere

Menon

One-stage augmentation and mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesth Plast Surg. 2004;28:259-267.

40.

Reish

Damjanovic

Austen

Jr , et al. Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(6):1223-1230.

41.

Spear

Murphy

DK.

Natrelle round silicone breast implants: core study results at 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1354-1361.

42.

Wan

Rohrich

RJ.

Revisiting the management of capsular contracture in breast augmentation: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):826-841.

43.

Marques

Brown

Oliveira

, et al. Long-term follow-up of breast capsule contracture rates in cosmetic and reconstructive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(3):769-778.

44.

Bachour

Capsular contracture in breast implant surgery: where are we now and where are we going?

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(3):1328-1337.

45.

Pasca

Bonci

Chiuzan

, et al. Treatment and prevention of periprosthetic capsular contracture in breast surgery with prosthesis using leukotriene receptor antagonists: a meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2022;42(5):483-494.

46.

Headon

Kasem

Mokbel

Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(5):532-543.

47.

Newman

Davison

SP.

Effect of Keller funnel on the rate of capsular contracture in periareolar breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(6):e1834.

48.

Wagner

Mirhaidari

SJ.

Capsulectomy, implant exchange, and placement of acellular dermal matrix is effective in treating capsular contracture in breast augmentation patients. Aesth Surg J. 2021;41(3):304-312.

49.

Papadopoulos

Vidovic

Neid

Abdallah

Using fat grafting to treat breast implant capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(11):e1969.

50.

Troell

. Adipose derived stem cells: harvesting, processing, storage and administration. In: Shiffman

Giuseppe

, eds. Stem Cells With Fat Transfer in Aesthetic Procedures: Science, Art, and Clinical Techniques. Springer-Verlag, 2015:249-292.

51.

Pagliara

Vitagliano

Mangialardi

, et al. The role of fat grafting on contracted breast implant capsules: a retrospective comparative histological and immunohistochemical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(3):1083-1093.

52.

Araco

Gravante

Araco

, et al. Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentation: a single-center review of 3002 patients. Aesth Surg J. 1997;336(10):677-682.

53.

Pittet

Montando

Pittet

Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:94-106.

54.

Courtiss

Goldwyn

Anastasi

. The fate of breast implants with infection around them. Plast Reconst Surg. 1979;63(6):812-816.

55.

Selber

Wren

Garvey

, et al. Critical evaluation of risk factors and early complications in 564 consecutive two-stage implant-based breast reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix at a single center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(1):10-20.

56.

Piper

Roussel

Koltz

PF.

Characterizing infections in prosthetic breast reconstruction: a validity assessment of National Health Databases. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2017;70:1345-1353.

57.

Ooi ASh, Song

DH.

Reducing infection risk in implant-based breast-reconstruction surgery: challenges and solutions. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2016;8:161-172.

58.

Spear

Howard

Boehmler

Ducic

Low

Abbruzzesse

MR.

The infected or exposed breast implant: management and treatment strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(6):1634-1644.

59.

Cohen

Carroll

Tenenbaum

Myckatyn

TM.

Breast implant-associated infections: the role of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the local microbiome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):921-929.

60.

Gfrerer

Mattos

Mastroianni

, et al. Assessment of patient factors, surgeons, and surgeon teams in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(2):245e-252e.

61.

Weichman

Clavin

Miller

, et al. Does the use of biopatch devices at drain sites reduce perioperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(1):9e-17e.

62.

Mangram

Horan

Pearson

Silver

Jarvis

WR.

Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97-134.

63.

Webster

Osborne

Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD004985.

64.

Chan

Smoking and wound healing problems in reduction mammoplasty. Is the introduction of urine nicotine testing justified?

Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:111-115.

65.

Wong

Lam

Abrishami

Chan

MTV

Chung

Short term preoperative smoking cessation and postoperative complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 2012;59:268-279.

66.

Kuri

Nakagawa

Tanaka

Hasuo

Kishi

Determination of the duration of preoperative smoking cessation to improve wound healing after head and neck surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(5):892-896.

67.

Bartsch

Weiss

Kästenbauer

, et al. Crucial aspects of smoking in wound healing after breast reduction surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(9):1045-1049.

68.

Rayatt

White

Jennings

Matthews

RN.

Smoking and elective surgery: a survey of UK plastic surgery consultants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(2):605-606.

69.

Rohrich

Krueger

Coberly

Brown

SA.

Reply regarding Rayatt S. Smoking and elective surgery: a survey of United Kingdom plastic surgery consultants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(2):605-606.

70.

Rohrich

Coberly

Krueger

Brown

SA.

Planning elective operations on patients who smoke: survey of North American plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(1):350-355; discussion 356.

71.

Troiano

Jaleel

Spiegel

JH.

Association of electronic cigarette vaping and cigarette smoking with decreased random flap viability in rats. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(1):5-10.

72.

Willershausen

Wolf

Weyer

Sader

Ghanaati

Willershausen

Influence of e-smoking liquids on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Head Face Med. 2014;10:39.

73.

Phillips

Bishawi

Dagum

Khan

Bui

DT.

A systemic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):1-13.

74.

Clayton

Bazakas

Lee

Hultman

Halvorson

EG.

Once is not enough: withholding postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in prosthetic breast reconstruction is associated with an increased risk of infection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(3):495-502.

75.

Yalanis

Liu

Cheng

HT.

Efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine irrigation in reducing the risk of capsular contracture in aesthetic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(4):687-689.

76.

Adams

Rios

Smith

SJ.

Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:46S-52S.

77.

Tirrell

Bekeny

Tefera

Song

Fan

KL.

Bacitracin for injection recall: impact on immediate breast implant surgical outcomes. Breast J. 2022;2022:1389539-1389511.

78.

Hanna

Tilt

Holland

, et al. Reducing infectious complications in implant based breast reconstruction: impact of early expansion and prolonged drain use. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(suppl 4):S312-S315.

79.

McCarthy

Disa

Pusic

Mehrara

Cordeiro

PG.

The effect of closed-suction drains on the incidence of local wound complications following tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2018-2022.

80.

Ganske

Verma

Rosen

Eriksson

Chun

YS.

Minimizing complications with the use of acellular dermal matrix for immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(5):464-470.

81.

Vardanian

Clayton

Roostaeian

, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):403e-410e.

82.

Kim

Davila

Persing

, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(1):28-41.

83.

Ngyuen

Shahabi

Hwang

Chan

Wong

AK.

A systemic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plat Surg. 2012;68:346-356.

84.

Nair

Mills

DC.

Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold internal support: preliminary experience with direct implant opposition during complex breast revisions. Aesth Surg J. 2019;39(11):1203-1213.

85.

Buccheri

Villanucci

Mallucci

Bistoni

de Vita

Synthetic reabsorbable mesh (GalaFLEX) as soft tissue adjunct in breast augmentation revision surgery. Aesth Surg J. 2023;43(5):559-566.

86.

Adams

Jr Baxter

Glicksman

Mast

Tantillo

Van Natta

BW.

The use of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in the ptotic breast: a multicenter clinical study. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(5):502-518.

87.

Backman

Hassan-Nur

Fridblom

Johansson

Fredholm

Fredriksson

OptiBra Study, a randomized controlled trial on optimal postoperative bra support after breast cancer surgery. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023;63:102285.

88.

Camirand

Doucet

Harris

Breast augmentation compression- a very important factor in preventing capsular contracture. Plast Recontr Surg. 1999;104:329-328.

89.

Kontos

Petrou

Prassas

, et al. Pressure dressing in breast surgery: is this the solution for seroma formation? J BUON. 2008;13(1):65-67.

90.

Chen

Hoe

Wong

CY.

The effect of a pressure garment on post-surgical drainage and seroma formation in breast cancer patients. Singapore Med J. 1998;39(9):412-415.

91.

Setälä

Papp

Joukainen

, et al. Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(2):195-199.

92.

Xue

Kania

Brown

Bullocks

Hollier

Izaddoost

SA.

Salvage of infected prosthetic breast reconstructions. Semin Plast Surg. 2016;30:55-59.

93.

PERRAS

The prevention and treatment of infections following breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;35:649-656.

94.

Toranto

Malow

JB.

Atypical mycobacteria periprosthetic infections- diagnosis and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66(2):226-228.

95.

Wilkinson

Swartz

Toranto

IR.

Resolution of late-developing periprosthetic breast infections without prosthesis removal. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1985;9(2):79-85.

96.

Yeo

Lee

Kim

, et al. Strategy for salvaging infected breast implants: lessons from the recovery of seven consecutive patients. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48(2):165-174.

97.

Sarfati

Millochau

Meredith

, et al. Salvaging the infected breast implant: results of a retrospective series of 80 consecutive cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(12):2232-2238.

98.

Washer

Gutowski

Breast implant infections. Inf Dis Clin North Am. 2012;26:111-125.

99.

Constantine

Rohrich

RJ.

The ever-changing role of biofilms in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):865e-872e.

100.

Boletta

McGoldrick

Hall-Findlay

Aesthetic breast surgery: what do the measurements reveal?

Aesh Surg J. 2020;40(7):742-752.