Afin de mieux comprendre l’influence d’un contexte de programme violent sur la mémorisation des publicités, trois expérimentations ont été menées. Prenant comme point de départ une réplication conceptuelle des travaux de Bushman et Bonacci (2002) (expérimentation 1), nous proposons d’étudier l’influence du niveau de violence contenu dans les programmes (expérimentation 2) ainsi que celle de la continuité narrative du récit, préservée ou non (expérimentation 3). Les résultats montrent que l’intensité de violence est positivement corrélée au rappel libre des publicités et que la continuité narrative n’a pas d’influence sur la mémorisation des publicités. Enfin, le rôle de l’implication envers le programme – variable médiatrice entre violence perçue et rappel publicitaire, modérée par le sexe et la sensibilité du spectateur – est mis en évidence.
AitkenR (1969) Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine62(10): 989–993.
2.
AndersonAWaisPGabrieliJ (2006) Emotion enhances remembrance of neutral events past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences103(5): 1599–1604.
3.
AxelrodJ (1963) Induced moods and attitudes toward products. Journal of Advertising Research3: 19–24.
4.
BaronRKennyD (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
5.
BradleyMLangP (1994) Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin (SAM) and the semantic differential. Journal of Experimental Psychiatry and Behavior Therapy25(1): 49–59.
6.
BushmanB (1998) Effects of television violence on memory for commercial messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied4(4): 291–307.
7.
BushmanB (2005) Violence and sex in television programs do not sell products in advertisements. Psychological Science16(9): 702–708.
8.
BushmanB (2007) That was a great commercial, but what were they selling? Effects of violence and sex on memory for products in television commercials. Journal of Applied Social Psychology37(8): 1784–1796.
9.
BushmanBBonacciA (2002) Violence and sex impair memory for television ads. Journal of Applied Psychology87(3): 557–564.
10.
Chumpitaz-CaceresRVanhammeJ (2003) Les processus modérateurs et médiateurs: distinction conceptuelle, aspects analytiques et illustrations. Recherche et Applications en Marketing18(2): 67–100.
11.
CohenJPhamMTAndradeE (2008) The nature and role of affect in consumer behavior. In HaugtvedtCHerrPKardesF (éd.) Handbook of Consumer Psychology. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 297–348.
12.
CSA (Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel) (1995) Enquête sur la représentation de la violence dans la fiction à la télévision, Jehel-Cathelineau S (rédacteur)Les documents CSA, novembre.
13.
CSA (Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel) (2010) Protection de l’enfance et de l’adolescence à la télévision, à la radio et sur les services de médias audiovisuels à la demande, Bilan de l’année 2009 et du premier semestre 2010, novembre.
14.
DerbaixCFilserM (2011) L’affectif dans les comportements d’achat et de consommation. Paris: Economica.
15.
DerbaixCPhamMT (1989) Pour un développement des mesures de l’affectif en marketing: Synthèse des pré-requis. Recherche et Applications en Marketing4(4): 71–87.
16.
DerbaixCPoncinI (2005) La mesure des réactions affectives en marketing: évaluation des principaux outils. Recherche et Applications en Marketing20(2): 55–75.
17.
FergusonC (2009) An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice40(5): 532–538.
18.
FergusonCCruzAMartinezDRuedaSFergusonD (2010) Violence and sex as advertising strategies in television commercials. European Psychologist15(4): 304–311.
19.
FriedCJohansonJ (2008) Sexual and violent media’s inhibition of advertisement memory: effect or artifact?Journal of Applied Social Psychology38(7): 1716–1735.
20.
GazzanigaM (2009) The cognitive neurosciences. 4ème edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
GunterBTohalaTFurnhamA (2001) Television violence and memory for TV advertisements. Communications: European Journal of Communication Research26(2): 109–127.
22.
GunterBFurnhamAPappaE (2005) Effects of television violence on memory for violent and nonviolent advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology35(8): 1680–1697.
23.
HulseLAllanKMemonAReadJ (2007) Emotional arousal and memory: A test of the post stimulus processing hypothesis. The American Journal of Psychology120(1): 73–90.
24.
IsenAShalkeTClarkMKarpL (1978) Affect, accessibility of material in memory and behavior – cognitive loop. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36(1): 1–12.
25.
MathurMChattopadhayA (1991) The impact of moods generated by television programs on responses to advertising. Psychology and Marketing8(1): 61–76.
26.
MoormanMNeijensPSmitE (2007) The effects of program involvement on commercial exposure and recall in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Advertising36(1): 121–137.
27.
MurtyVRitcheyMAdcockRLaBarK (2011) fMRI studies of successful emotional memory encoding: A quantitative meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia49(4): 695–705.
28.
NahonDTassiP (1998) Le contexte d’insertion des messages et la mémorisation de la publicité télévisée. Décisions Marketing13: 47–56.
29.
NielsonKAPowless (2007) Positive and negative sources of emotional arousal enhance long-term word-list retention when induced as long as 30 min after learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory88(1): 40–47.
30.
NormanGStreinerD (2000) Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. 2ème édition. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Becker.
31.
NorrisCColmanA (1992) Context effects on recall and recognition of magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising21(3): 37–46.
32.
OliveiraAFonsecaITeixeiraMSimõesF (2005) A functional measurement approach to the “Self-Assessment Manikin”. Fechner Day251–256.
33.
PaternosterRBrameRMazerollePPiqueroA (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology36(4): 859–866.
34.
PhamMT (2004) The logic of feeling. Journal of Consumer Psychology14(4): 360–369.
35.
PrasadKSmithL (1994) Television commercials in violent programming: an experimental evaluation of their effects on children. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science22(4): 340–351.
36.
PreacherKKelleyK (2011) Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods16(2): 93–115.
37.
SchwabeLBohringerAChatterjeeMSchachingerH (2008) Effects of pre-learning stress on memory for neutral, positive and negative words: Different roles of cortisol and autonomic arousal. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory90, 44–53.
38.
ShenF (2001) Effects of violence and brand familiarity on responses to television commercials. International Journal of Advertising20(3): 381–397.
39.
ShenFPrinsenT (1999) Audience responses to TV commercials embedded in violent programs. The Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising100–106.
40.
SinghSHitchonJ (1989) The intensifying effects of exciting television programs on the reception of subsequent commercials. Psychology and Marketing6(1): 1–31.
41.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (1996) Using multivariate statistics. 3ème édition. New York: HarperCollins.
42.
TavassoliNShultzCFitzsimonsG (1995) Program involvement: are moderate levels best for ad memory and attitude toward the ad?Journal of Advertising Research35(5): 61–72.
43.
WewersMLoweN (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursery Health13(4): 227–236.
ZhaoXLynchJJrChenQ (2011) Reconsidérer Baron et Kenny: mythes et vérités à propos de l’analyse de médiation. Recherche et Applications en Marketing26(1): 81–95.
46.
ZillmannD (1971) Excitation transfer in communication-mediated aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology7(4): 419–434.
