Pity,Modernity and the Spectacle of Suffering

Abstract

French

The concept of dignity is often invoked in relation to ideas about a “good” death and, indeed, a “good” life. In this article, I discuss the question of dignity in relation to the rights of the individual in the modern world. This world is one where the relationship of individuals to society is contested in the context of medicine, with all its technologies of treatment and uncertainties of prognosis. For patients who criticize or oppose medicine in order to recover their dignity, it is necessary to articulate or to portray their suffering. In this way, they are able to show not only that they live in spite of illness, but that they also live by virtue of it. From this perspective, dignity is shown to be part of a collective response to a medicalized world in which ideas about illness and health are also being transformed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Payne

S.A.

, Langley-Evans

, Hillier

Perceptions of a “good” death: a comparative study of the views of hospice staff and patients. Palliat Med 1996; 10: 307–312.

Pullman

Human dignity and the ethics and aesthetics of pain and suffering. Theor Med 2002; 23: 75–94.

Berger

P.L.

, Berger

, Kellner

The homeless mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974; pp. 83–84.

However, honour is not an outmoded concept in the modern world when applied to people in their institutional role. The soldiers portrayed in media photographs showing indignities heaped upon their Iraqi prisoners are guilty of dishonourable conduct. It is not shame (following the loss of dignity) that attaches to them and their regiment, but disgrace consequent upon a loss of honour.

Bogdan

, Taylor

S.J.

Relationships with severely disabled people: the social construction of humanness. Soc Probl 1989; 36(2): 135–148.

Charmaz

Loss of self: a fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociol Health IIIn 1983; 5: 168–195.

Herzlich

Modern medicine and the quest for meaning: illness as a social signifier. In: Auge

, Herzlich

(eds). The Meaning of Illness: anthropology, history and sociology. London: Harwood, 1995; pp. 151–173.

Arendt

On Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.

Frank

A.W.

At the Will of the Body: reflections on illness. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1991.

10.

Rose

Love's Work. London: Chatto and Windus, 1995.

11.

Radley

The aesthetics of illness: narrative, horror and the sublime. Sociol Health llln 1999; 21: 778–796.

12.

Frank

A.W.

The Wounded Storyteller: body, illness and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995; p. 39.

13.

Spence

Putting Myself in the Picture: a political, personal and photographic autobiography. Seattle: Real Comet Press, 1988.

14.

Jones

Body Art/Performing the Subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.

15.

Yet the display of these particular photographs, as with all images relating to illness, is context sensitive and continues, with each revelation, to risk the dignity of the women pictured. To sustain that dignity requires the observer to look with a caring eye, to complete the arc of understanding that Spence's and Wilke's pictures invite but cannot demand. This underlines the fact that the appearance of dignity is relational, contested, and multifaceted. Spence and Wilke do not just ask that we be indignant or that we care, but that we assume a “prototypical responsibility.” See: Radley A. Portrayals of suffering: on looking away, looking at, and the comprehension of illness experience. Body & Society 2002; 8: 1–23.