Persons with cancer are likely to encounter a loss of personal control as a result of their illness experience. An empowerment perspective, which emphasizes the possibility of patients “owning their own lives”, is useful for understanding the interpersonal and social dynamics of patients’ loss of control and for guiding the development of strategies aimed at maximizing control. Because the factors influencing an individual's sense of control are multileveled, optimal empowerment occurs when strategies are employed at several levels of social organization. In this paper, a number of barriers to the empowerment of cancer patients are identified and strategies recommended to enhance patient empowerment in cancer care. The empowerment needs and strategies discussed here include: (a) the provision of optimal care, (b) the enhancement of individual patient power, (c) the development of a strong consumer voice in policy decision-making processes, and (d) societal attitude change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChurchK.Systems advocacy and empowerment: Definitions and relationships.Toronto: Ontario Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office, in press.
2.
American Cancer Society.Cancer facts and figures, 1985.New York: American Cancer Society, 1985.
3.
LoveR.R., LeventhalH., EasterlingD.V., NerenzD.R.Side effects and emotional distress during during cancer chemotherapy. Cancer1989: 63, 604–612.
4.
OgleB.By faith alone. The Human Spirit, Feb. 1989, pp. 1–3.
5.
Cornell Empowerment Group.The empowerment process. Draft version of the Van Leer Working Paper, 1989.
6.
FioreN.A.The Road Back To Health: Coping with the Emotional Side of Cancer.New York: Bantam Books, 1984.
7.
ChurchK., RevilleD.User involvement in the mental health field in Canada. Can Men Health1989: 37(2), 22–25.
8.
MeyerowitzB.E., WilliamsJ.G., GessnerJ.Perceptions of controllability and attitudes toward cancer patients. J Appl Soc Psych1987: 17, 493–506.
9.
FreireP.Pedagogy of the Oppressed.N.Y.: Seabury Press, 1970.
10.
GrahamJ.In the Company of Others.New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.
11.
MooreL.S.Stress the ‘S’ word is mandate at NCSS. Coping1989, Winter: 3(2), pp. 22–23.
12.
KatzI., HassG., ParisiN., AstoneJ., McEvaddyD., LucidoD.Lay people's and health care personnel's perception of cancer, AIDS, cardiac and diabetic patients. Psychological Reports1987: 60, 615–629.
13.
LiftonR.J.The Broken Connection.New York: Simon & Schuster, 1979.
14.
RappaportJ.Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. Am J Comm Psych1987: 15(2), 121–145.
15.
WhitmoreE.Participatory evaluation approaches: Side effects and empowerment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1988.
16.
CochranM.Addressing youth and family vulnerability: Empowerment in an ecological context. Can J Pub Health1988: Supplement 2, 79, S10–S16.
17.
KerrI.G., SoneM., DeAngelisC.Continuous narcotic infusion with patient-controlled analgesia for chronic cancer pain in outpatients. Ann Int Med1988: 108, 554–557.
18.
GrayR.E., DoanB.D.Facilitating coping with chemotherapy: Development and evaluation of a brief group intervention. Unpublished manuscript, 1989.
19.
International Conference on Supportive Care.A report with recommendations. Montebello, Quebec. J. Palliat Care1988: 5(2), 24–61.
20.
GassilethB.R., ZupkisR.V., Sutton-SmithK., MarchV.Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Int Med1980: 92, 832–836.
21.
BertakisK.D.The communication of information from physician to patient: A method for increasing patient retention and satisfaction. J Fam Practice1977: 5, 217–222.
22.
GoldbergR.J.Disclosure of information to adult cancer patients: Issues and update. J Clin Onc1984: 2, 948–955.
23.
HollandJ.C., GearyN., MarchiniA., TrossS.An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer. Cancer Invest1987: 5, 151–154.
24.
DegnerL.F., RussellC.A.Preferences for treatment control among adults with cancer. Res Nursing Health1988: 11, 367–374.
25.
CassilethB.R., ZupkisR.V., Sutton-SmithK., MarchV.Informed consent — why are its goals imperfectly realized?New Eng J Med1980: 302, 896–900.
26.
GardL., EdwardsP.W., HarrisJ., McCormackG.Sensitizing effects of pretreatment measures on cancer chemotherapy nausea and vomiting. J Consult Clin Psych1988: 56(1), 80–84.
27.
McintoshJ.Patients’ awareness and desire for information about diagnosed but undisclosed malignant disease. Lancet1976: 2, 300–303.
28.
SutherlandH.J., Llewellyn-ThomasH.A., LockwoodG.A., TritchlerP.L., TillJ.E.Cancer patients: Their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J Royal Soc Med1989: 82, 260–263.
29.
MillerS.M., ManganC.E.Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: Should the doctor tell all?J Pers Soc Psych1983: 45(1), 223–236.
30.
MesserliM.L., GaramendiC., RomanoJ.Breast cancer: Information as a technique of crisis intervention. Am J Orthopsychiat1980: 50, 728–731.
31.
StrullW.M., LoB., CharlesG.Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?JAMA1984: 252, 2990–2994.
32.
RayC., FisherJ., WisniewskiT.K.M.Surgeons’ attitudes toward breast cancer, its treatment, and their relationship with patients. J Psychosoc Onc1986: 4, 33–43.
33.
FadenR.R., BeckerC., LewisC., FreemanJ., FadenA.I.Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Medical Care1981: 19, 718–733.
34.
CassilethB.R., LuskE.J., StrouseT.B., BodenheimerB.A.Contemporary unorthodox treatments in cancer medicine. Ann Int Med1984: 101, 105–112.
35.
GrayR.E., DoanB.D.Heroic self-healing and cancer: Clinical issues for the health professions. J Palliat Care1990: 6(1), 32–41.
36.
Mathews-SimontonS., SimontonO.C., CreightonJ.L.Getting Well Again.New York: Bantam Books, 1978.
37.
SiegelB.S.Love, Medicine and Miracles.New York: Harper & Row, 1986.
38.
SiegelB.S.Peace, Love and Healing.New York: Harper & Row, 1989.
39.
DostallC., BroatchJ.My God I thought you'd died.Toronto: Seal Books, 1986.
40.
CunninghamA.J., ToccoE.K.Evaluation of brief group psychoeducational therapy for improving quality of life in cancer patients. J Psychosoc Onc: in press.
41.
Canadian Cancer Society.Cansurmount and Reach to Recovery Program Guide.Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society, 1987.
42.
BlackfordP.Challenging the course of cancer: A report on the pilot program. Unpublished manuscript, Oct., 1989.
43.
Canadian Cancer Society.Report on the needs of people living with cancer in Prince Edward Island.Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society, 1989.
44.
ValentineM.B., CapponiP.Mental health consumer participation on boards and committees: Barriers and strategies. Can Men Health1989: 37(2), 8–12.
45.
GruberJ., TrickettE.Can we empower others? The paradox of empowerment in the governing of an alternative public school. Am J Comm Psych1987: 15(3), 353–371.
46.
RachlisM., KushnerC.Second opinion: What's wrong with Canada's health-care system and how to fix it.Toronto: Collins, 1989.
47.
SpringarnN.D.A new breed of survivors. Coping1989, Winter: 3(2), pp. 25–29.
