While there is strong international evidence that language barriers present obstacles to healthcare access, quality and safety, little research has been conducted on the experience of official language minorities in Canada. This multiple method research used on-line and paper-based surveys, combined with semi-structured individual interviews to explore the experience with access to care of Francophone minorities living in four Canadian provinces. The majority of Francophones surveyed reported limited access to French language services and described an environment where low importance is given to addressing language barriers within the health system. Even when services are available, the lack of services in French sometimes results in avoidance of care. Results confirm that many Francophones face similar barriers to care as other language minorities in Canada. Strategies to improve access for official language minorities are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JacobsEChenAHKarlinerLSAgger-GuptaNMuthaS. The need for more research on language barriers in healthcare: a proposed research agenda. Milbank Q. 2006;84(1):111–133.
2.
KarlinerLSJacobsEAChenAHMuthaS. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(2):727–754.
3.
OhtaniASuzukiTTakeuchiHUchidaH. Language barriers and access to psychiatric care: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(8):798–805.
4.
SchweiRJDel PozoSAgger-GuptaN. Changes in research on language barriers in healthcare since 2003: a cross-sectional review study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;54:36–44.
5.
BowenS. The Impact of Language Barriers on Patient Safety and Quality of Care. Ottawa, Ontario: Société Santé en français; 2015.
6.
BrarSTangSDrummondN. Perinatal Care for South Asian Immigrant Women and Women Born in Canada: telephone Survey of Users. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;31(8):708–716.
7.
CohenALChristakisDA. Primary language of parent is associated with disparities in pediatric preventive care. J Pediatr. 2006;148(2):254–258.
8.
McDonaldJTKennedyS. Cervical cancer screening by immigrant and minority women in Canada. J Immigr Minor Health. 2007;9(4):323–334.
9.
FryerCMackintoshSBatchlorFHillKSaidC. The effect of limited English proficiency on falls risk and falls prevention after stroke. Age Ageing. 2012;41(1):104–107.
10.
ShiLLebrunLATsaiJ. The influence of English proficiency on access to care. Ethn Health. 2009;14(6):625–642.
11.
NgwakongnwiEHemmelgarnBRMustoRQuanHKing-ShierKM. Experiences of French speaking immigrants and non-immigrants accessing healthcare services in a large Canadian city. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(10):3755–3768.
12.
Fédération canadienne des francophones et acadiens. Profils des communautés francophones et acadiennes du Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Federation of Francophones and Acadians; 2011. Available at: http://profils.fcfa.ca/fr/Vitalite-Demographique_200. Accessed May 18, 2017.
13.
Ramisetty-MiklerSMiklerAO’NeillMKomatzJ. Conceptual framework and quantification of population vulnerability for effective emergency response planning. J Emerg Manag. 2015;13(3):227–238.
14.
Consortium national de formation en santé. Étudier en français en santé, des carrières qui font du bien!. Ottawa, Ontario: Association des collèges et universités de la francophonie canadienne (ACUFC); 2015. Available at: http://cnfs.net/. Accessed May 18, 2017.
de MoissacDGiassonFRoch-GagnéM. Accès aux services sociaux et de santé en français: l’expérience des Franco-Manitobains. Min Ling Soc. 2015;6:42–65.
17.
DroletMSavardJBenotJ. Health services for linguistic minorities in a bilingual setting: challenges for bilingual professionals. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(3):295–305.
JuckettGUngerK. Appropriate use of medical interpreters. Am Fam Physician. 2014;90(7):476–480.
20.
VanderWielenLEnurahARhoH. Medical interpreters: improvements to address access, equity, and quality of care for limited-English-proficient patients. Acad Med. 2014;89(10):1324–1327.
Healthcare Interpretation Network. National Standard Guide for Community Interpreting Services. Toronto, Ontario: Healthcare Interpretation Network; 2010. Available at: http://healthcareinterpretationnetwork.ca/publications/standards/. Accessed August 18, 2016.
24.
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority. Language Access: Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice for Interpreters. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Winnipeg Regional Health Authority; 2013. Available at: http://www.wrha.mb.ca/professionals/language/files/EthicsCode.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2017.
25.
SarfatyMTurnerCDamottaE. Use of a patient assistant to facilitate medical visits for Latino patients with low health literacy. J Community Health. 2005;30(4):299–307.
26.
HedlundNRisendalBPaulsH. Dissemination of patient navigation programs across the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014;20(4): E15–E24.
27.
Government of Ontario. French Language Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.32. Toronto, Ontario: Government of Ontario; 2015. Available at:https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90f32. Accessed May 18, 2017.
Canadian Volunteers United in Action. Nos Services. Edmonton, Alberta: Canadian Volunteers United in Action; 2016. Available at: http://www.canavua.org/nos_services.html. Accessed May 18, 2017.
de MoissacD. Accès aux services de santé et d’interprète-accompagnateur: l’expérience des communautés minoritaires à faible densité de francophones au Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Société Santé en français; 2016.
33.
PattonMQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
34.
ThomasDR. A general inductive approach for evaluating qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237–246.
35.
KarlinerLSPérez-StableEJGregorichSE. Convenient access to professional interpreters in the hospital decreases readmission rates and estimated hospital expenditures for patients with limited English proficiency. Med Care. 2017;55(3):199–206.
36.
LindholmMHargravesJLFergusonWJReedG. Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1294–1299.
37.
SavardSde MoissacDBenoîtJ. Le recrutement et la rétention d’intervenants en santé et services sociaux bilingues en situation francophone minoritaire. In: DroletMBouchardPSavardJ, eds. L’offre active de services sociaux et de santé pour les communautés de la francophonie canadienne en situation minoritaire: Les acteurs, le système et les leviers d’action. Ottawa, Ontario: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa; 2016.
38.
BowenS. Language Barriers Within the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority: Evidence and Implications. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Winnipeg Regional Health Authority; 2004.
39.
FloresGAbreuMBaroneCPBachurRLinH. Errors of medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences: a comparison of professional versus ad hoc versus no interpreters. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(5):545–553.
40.
KilianSSwartzLDowlingTDlaliMChilizaB. The potential consequences of informal interpreting practices for assessment of patients in a South African psychiatric hospital. Soc Sci Med. 2014;106:159–167.
41.
BischoffAHudelsonP. Access to healthcare interpreter services: where are we and where do we need to go?Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(7):2838–2844.
