Scalable, interprofessional care models are needed to support chronic disease management and improve access to speciality services. A community hospital heart function clinic expanded from a single-site, nurse practitioner–led model to a two-site interprofessional program over 4 years. The objective was to examine program growth, service utilization, and operational strategies supporting sustainable expansion. A retrospective review assessed annual encounters, visit types, and provider activity across nursing, pharmacy, supportive cardiology, and community partnerships. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided analysis of implementation and scalability. Annual encounters increased from 1,562 to 4,623, with unique patients rising from 566 to 854. Registered Nurse telephone follow-ups expanded substantially, with additional growth in Nurse Practitioner and pharmacy visits. The second site accounted for nearly 10% of visits, improving regional access. Interprofessional collaboration and distributed care supported sustainable growth and improved access to specialized heart failure services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BhatiaRSAustinPCStukelTA, et al.Outcomes in patients with heart failure treated in hospitals with varying admission rates: population-based cohort study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(12):981-988. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002816.
PoonSLeisBLambertL, et al.The state of heart failure care in Canada: minimal improvement in readmissions over time despite an increased number of evidence-based therapies. CJC Open. 2022;4(8):667-675. doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2022.04.011.
4.
EllisEEQuereshiHDoverDC, et al.Economic burden of heart failure hospitalizations in Canada: a population-based study. CJC Open. 2025;7(3):279-286. doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.019.
5.
MoghaddamNLindsayMPHawkinsNM, et al.Access to heart failure services in Canada: findings of the Heart and Stroke National Heart Failure Resources and Services Inventory. Can J Cardiol. 2023;39(10):1469-1479. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2023.06.430.
6.
SaveskiDKokMPoonS, et al.The Canadian heart failure (CAN-HF) registry: a Canadian multicentre, retrospective study of outpatients with heart failure. CJC Open. 2025;7(1):1-9. doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.014.
7.
LindsayPAndersonKDucharmeA, et al.The state of heart failure services in Canada: findings of the heart & stroke national heart failure resources and services inventory. Can J Cardiol. 2022;38(10):S188-S189. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2022.08.153.
GandhiSMoslehWSharmaUCDemersCFarkouhMESchwalmJD. Multidisciplinary heart failure clinics are associated with lower heart failure hospitalization and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(10):1237-1244. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2017.05.011.
11.
WeinsteinJMGreenbergDSharfASimon‐TuvalT. The impact of a community‐based heart failure multidisciplinary team clinic on healthcare utilization and costs. ESC Heart Fail. 2022;9(1):676-684. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13689.
12.
RawlinsonCCarronTCohidonC, et al.An overview of reviews on interprofessional collaboration in primary care: barriers and facilitators. Int J Integrated Care. 2021;21(2):32. doi:10.5334/ijic.5589.
13.
King-DaileyKFrazierSBresslerSKing-WilsonJ. The role of nurse practitioners in the management of heart failure patients and programs. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022;24(12):1945-1956. doi:10.1007/s11886-022-01796-0.
EsserRFargesCEstebanM, et al.Advanced practice nurse–led cardiogeriatric heart failure pathways: a narrative, practice-based description of an integrated care model. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2026;19:1-11. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S599213.
DamschroderLJReardonCMWiderquistMAOLoweryJ. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75. doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
19.
CFIR Research Team - Center for Clinical Management Research. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guide. Published online 2023. https://cfirguide.org/guide/app/#/guide
LamJAhmadKGinKChowCM. Deliver cardiac virtual care: a primer for cardiovascular professionals in Canada. CJC Open. 2022;4(2):148-157. doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2021.10.001.
23.
LancasterGKolakowsky‐HaynerSKovacichJGreer‐WilliamsN. Interdisciplinary communication and collaboration among physicians, nurses, and unlicensed assistive personnel. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015;47(3):275-284. doi:10.1111/jnu.12130.
24.
FosterMWeaverJShalabyR, et al.Shared care practices in community addiction and mental health services: a qualitative study on the experiences and perspectives of stakeholders. Healthcare. 2022;10(5):831. doi:10.3390/healthcare10050831.
25.
LalaniMMarshallM. Co‐location, an enabler for service integration? Lessons from an evaluation of integrated community care teams in East London. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(2):e388. doi:10.1111/hsc.13211.
26.
LankshearSMartinD. Getting comfortable with “it depends”: embracing the impermanence of scope of practice. Can J Nurs Leader. 2019;32(1):30-41. doi:10.12927/cjnl.2019.25850.
27.
BorghmansFFernandesVLaletasSNewnhamH. “You do need each member of the team to bring that next piece of the puzzle”: allied health professionals’ experience of interprofessional complex care in hospital settings. PLoS One. 2025;20:e0317799. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317799.
28.
BornmanJLouwB. Leadership development strategies in interprofessional healthcare collaboration: a rapid review. J Healthc Leader. 2023;15:175-192. doi:10.2147/JHL.S405983.
AuschraC. Barriers to the integration of care in inter-organisational settings: a literature review. Int J Integrated Care. 2018;18(1):5. doi:10.5334/ijic.3068.
