Communication of Code Status Escalation for Nurses and Physicians in the Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study

Abstract

Background

Interprofessional teams working in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) care for patients requiring varying degrees of life sustaining therapy. A patient's code status can help clinicians to understand the appropriate life support measures to deliver to patients in this setting. Members of the interprofessional team, such as physicians and nurses, can experience challenges related to communication when the code status is unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore how nurses and physicians in the ICU experience communication of code status escalations.

Methods

A qualitative case study approach was used. Participants were physicians and nurses, working in the medical-surgical ICU of a large, urban academic hospital. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, observations of health care rounds and a chart review. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

Thematic findings include: (1) engaging in an interprofessional discussion, (2) finding consistent documentation, (3) revisiting the code status, and (4) telling the patient story. The study findings also provide contextual information about participants’ experiences of code status communication during the first wave (February 2020 to May 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions

The results of this study could inform standard communication frameworks or practices related to dissemination of code status decisions among members of the ICU team.

Keywords

End of life intensive care unit code status COVID-19 interprofessional multidisciplinary

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

W. G.

Cimino

J. W.

Ernecoff

N. C.

Ungar

Shotsberger

K. J.

Pollice

L. A.

Buddadhumaruk

Carson

Curtis

J. R.

Hough

C. L.

Matthay

M. A.

Peterson

M. W.

Steingrub

J. S.

White

D. N.

(2015). A multicenter study of key stakeholders’ perspectives on communicating with surrogates about prognosis in intensive care units. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 12(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201407-325OC

Arksey

O'Malley

(2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Bell

McAllister

Ward

P. R.

Russell

(2016). Interprofessional learning, impression management, and spontaneity in the acute healthcare setting. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(5), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1198310

Cope

(2015). Case study research methodology in nursing research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 42(6), 681–682.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Dzeng

Colaianni

Martin

Levine

Kelly

M. P.

Barclay

Smith

T. J.

(2016). Moral distress amongst American physician trainees regarding futile treatments at the end of life: A qualitative study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3505-1

Gonzalo

J. D.

Heist

B. S.

Duffy

B. L.

Dyrbye

Fagan

M. J.

Ferenchick

G. S.

Harrell

Hemmer

P. A.

Kernan

W. N.

Kogan

J. R.

Rafferty

Wong

Elnicki

D. M.

(2013). The value of bedside rounds: A multicenter qualitative study. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25(4), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.830514

Hartog

C. S.

Peschel

Schwarzkopf

Curtis

J. R.

Westermann

Kabisch

Pfeifer

Guenther

Michalsen

Reinhart

(2014). Are written advanced directives helpful to guide end-of-life therapy in the intensive care unit? A retrospective matched-cohort study. Journal of Critical Care, 29(1), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.024

Hartog

C. S.

Schwarzkopf

Riedemann

N. C.

Pfeifer

Guenther

Egerland

Sprung

C. L.

Hoyer

Gensichen

Reinhart

(2015). End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: A patient-based questionnaire of intensive care unit staff perception and relatives’ psychological response. Palliative Medicine, 29(4), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216314560007

10.

Henrich

N. J.

Dodek

P. M.

Alden

Keenan

S. P.

Reynolds

Rodney

(2016). Causes of moral distress in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study. Journal of Critical Care, 35, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.033

11.

Higginson

I. J.

Rumble

Shipman

Koffman

Sleeman

K. E.

Morgan

Hopkins

Noble

Bernal

Leonard

Dampier

Prentice

Burman

Costantini

(2016). The value of uncertainty in critical illness? An ethnography study of the patterns and conflicts in care and decision-making trajectories. BMC Anesthesiology, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0177-2

12.

Houghton

Murphy

Shaw

Casey

(2015). Qualitative case study data analysis: an example from practice. Nurse Researcher, 22(5), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.5.8.e1307

13.

Jensen

H. I.

Ammentorp

Johannessen

Ørding

(2013). Challenges in end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit: an ethical perspective. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 10, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-012-9416-5

14.

Jox

R. J.

Krebs

Fegg

Reiter-Theil

Frey

Eisenmenger

Borasio

G. D.

(2010). Limiting life-sustaining treatment in German intensive care units: A multiprofessional survey. Journal of Critical Care, 25(3), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.06.012

15.

Kvande

Lykkeslet

Storli

S. L.

(2017). ICU Nurses and physicians dialogue regarding patients clinical status and care options: A focus group study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 12(1), 1267346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2016.1267346

16.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

17.

Morse

J. M.

(1994). Emerging from the data: the cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In Morse

J. M.

(Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 25–35). Sage Publications.

18.

Nielson

(2020, April 24). A timeline of COVID-19 in Ontario. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/6859636/ontario-coronavirus-timeline/.

19.

O’Neill

C. S.

Yaqoob

Faraj

O’Neill

C. L.

(2017). Nurses’ care practices at the end of life in intensive care units in Bahrain. Nursing Ethics, 24(8), 950–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733016629771

20.

Peter

Mohammed

Simmonds

(2014). Narratives of aggressive care: knowledge, time, and responsibility. Nursing Ethics, 21(4), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733013502804

21.

Pettersson

Hedström

Höglund

A. T.

(2014). Striving for good nursing care: Nurses’ experiences of do not resuscitate orders within oncology and hematology care. Nursing Ethics, 21(8), 902–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733014533238

22.

Pettersson

Höglund

A. T.

Hedström

(2018). Perspectives on the DNR decision process: A survey of nurses and physicians in hematology and oncology. PLoS One, 13(11), e0206550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206550

23.

Purcell

L. N.

Tignanelli

C. J.

Maine

Charles

(2020). Predictors of change in code status from time of admission to death in critically ill surgical patients. The American Surgeon, 86(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313482008600334

24.

Reader

T. W.

Flin

Mearns

Cuthbertson

B. H.

(2007). Interdisciplinary communication in the intensive care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 98(3), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael372

25.

Stake

(1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.

26.

Thomasson

Petros

Lorenzo-Rivero

Moore

Stanley

(2011). Quality of documented consent for the de-escalation of care on a general and trauma surgery service. The American Surgeon, 77(7), 883–887. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/ login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/docview/877626877?accountid=13631. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481107700724

27.

Westphal

D. M.

McKee

S. A.

(2009). End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit: Physician and nurse perspectives. American Journal of Medical Quality, 24(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860608330825