In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
Methods:
We searched Medline (via PubMed), EBSCO, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for relevant published studies. We selected studies assessing the accuracy of DECT in the detection of PE. Quality assessment of bias and applicability was conducted using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate mean estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was drawn to get the Cochran Q-index and the area under the curve (AUC).
Results:
Seven studies were included in our systematic review. Of the 182 patients included, 108 patients had PEs. The pooled analysis showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.4%-94.1%) and 94.6% (95% CI: 86.7%-98.5%), respectively. The pooled PLR was 8.186 (95% CI: 3.726-17.986), while the pooled NLR was 0.159 (95% CI: 0.093-0.270). Cochran-Q was 0.8712, and AUC was 0.935 in the sROC curve.
Conclusion:
Dual-energy computed tomography shows high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy in the detection of acute PE. The high PLR highlights the high clinical importance of DECT as a prevalence-independent, rule-in test. Studies with a larger sample size with standardized reference tests are still needed to increase the statistical power of the study and support these findings.
AlisJLatsonLAHaramatiLBShmuklerA. Navigating the pulmonary perfusion map: dual-energy computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42(6):840–849. doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000801.
2.
MaoXWangSJiangXZhangLXuW. Diagnostic value of dual-source computerized tomography combined with perfusion imaging for peripheral pulmonary embolism. Iran J Radiol. 2016;13(2):e29402. doi:10.5812/iranjradiol.29402.
3.
SakamotoASakamotoINagayamaHKoikeHSueyoshiEUetaniM. Quantification of lung perfusion blood volume with dual-energy CT: assessment of the severity of acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(2):287–291. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11586.
4.
ChaS-IShinK-MLeeJ-W, et al.Clinical characteristics of patients with peripheral pulmonary embolism. Respiration. 2010;80(6):500–508. doi:10.1159/000277929.
5.
VedovatiMCBecattiniCAgnelliG, et al.Multidetector CT scan for acute pulmonary embolism: embolic burden and clinical outcome. Chest. 2012;142(6):1417–1424. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2739.
6.
ImDJHurJHanKH, et al.Acute pulmonary embolism: retrospective cohort study of the predictive value of perfusion defect volume measured with dual-energy CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(5):1015–1022. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.17815.
7.
SadighGKellyAMCroninP. Challenges, controversies, and hot topics in pulmonary embolism imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):497–515. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5830.
8.
Remy-JardinMPistolesiMGoodmanLR, et al.Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2007;245(2):315–329. doi:10.1148/radiol.2452070397.
9.
RitchieGMcGurkSMcCreathCGrahamCMurchisonJT. Prospective evaluation of unsuspected pulmonary embolism on contrast enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) scanning. Thorax. 2007;62(6):536–540. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.062299.
10.
MorzyckiABhatiaAMurphyKJ. Adverse reactions to contrast material: a Canadian update. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017;68(2):187–193. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2016.05.006.
11.
FinkCJohnsonTMichaelyH, et al.Dual-energy CT angiography of the lung in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: initial results. RöFo. 2008;180(10):879–883. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1027724.
12.
KangM-JParkCMLeeC-HGooJMLeeHJ. Dual-energy CT: clinical applications in various pulmonary diseases. RadioGraphics. 2010;30(3):685–698. doi:10.1148/rg.303095101.
13.
RenardBRemy-JardinMSantangeloT, et al.Dual-energy CT angiography of chronic thromboembolic disease: can it help recognize links between the severity of pulmonary arterial obstruction and perfusion defects?Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(3):467–472. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.018.
14.
PontanaFFaivreJBRemy-JardinM, et al.Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(12):1494–1504. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.018.
15.
ZhangL-JZhaoY-EWuS-Y, et al.Pulmonary embolism detection with dual-energy CT: experimental study of dual-source CT in rabbits. Radiology. 2009;252(1):61–70. doi:10.1148/radiol.2521081682.
16.
FlohrTGMcColloughCHBruderH, et al.First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(2):256–268. doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2919-2.
17.
JohnsonTRCKraußBSedlmairM, et al.Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(6):1510–1517. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0517-6.
MolaeeSGhanaatiHSafaviEForoumandiMPeimanS. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography for evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: use or overuse. Iran J Radiol. 2015;12(3):e22383. doi:10.5812/iranjradiol.12(2)2015.22383.
20.
FerdaJFerdováEMírkaH, et al.Pulmonary imaging using dual-energy CT, a role of the assessment of iodine and air distribution. Eur JRadiol. 2011;77(2):287–293. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.005.
21.
MeinelFGNanceJWJoseph SchoepfU, et al.Predictive value of computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2015;128(7):747–759.e2. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.023.
22.
McInnesMDFMoherDThombsBD, et al.Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA. 2018;319(4):388–396. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.19163.
23.
McGrathTAAlabousiMSkidmoreB, et al.Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):194. doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0590-8.
24.
MacaskillPGatsonisCDeeksJJHarbordRMTakwoingiY. Chapter 10: Analysing and Presenting Results. In: DeeksJJBossuytPMGatsonisC, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2010. https://methods.cochrane.org/sdt/handbook-dta-reviews. Accessed November 20, 2019.
25.
WhitingPFRutjesAWSWestwoodME, et al.QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–536. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
26.
BaratlooAHosseiniMNegidaAAshalGElEl AshalG. Part 1: simple definition and calculation of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Emergency. 2015;3(2):48–49. doi:10.22037/emergency.v3i2.8154.
27.
SafariSBaratlooAElfilMNegidaA. Evidence based emergency medicine part 2: positive and negative predictive values of diagnostic tests. Emergency. 2015;3(3):87–88.
28.
BaratlooASafariSElfilMNegidaA. Evidence based emergency medicine part 3: positive and negative likelihood ratios of diagnostic tests. Emergency. 2015;3(4):170–171.
29.
GeyerLLScherrMKörnerM, et al.Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism using a dual energy CT system with rapid kVp switching: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(12):3711–3718. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.043.
30.
LeeCWSeoJBSongJW, et al.Evaluation of computer-aided detection and dual energy software in detection of peripheral pulmonary embolism on dual-energy pulmonary CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(1):54–62. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1903-7.
31.
MiuraSOhnoYKimuraHKichikawaK. Quantitative lung perfused blood volume imaging on dual-energy CT: capability for quantitative assessment of disease severity in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Acta Radiologica. 2015;56(3):284–293. doi:10.1177/0284185114524953.
32.
ThiemeSFBeckerCRHackerMNikolaouKReiserMFJohnsonTRC. Dual energy CT for the assessment of lung perfusion-correlation to scintigraphy. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68(3):369–374. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.031.
33.
ZhangJCaiJLiuSZhangX. Value of dual-energy lung perfusion imaging using a dual-source CT System for the pulmonary embolism. Open Life Sci. 2018;13(1):107–111.
34.
ZhangLJYangGFZhaoYEZhouCSLuGM. Detection of pulmonary embolism using dual-energy computed tomography and correlation with cardiovascular measurements: a preliminary study. Acta Radiologica. 2009;50(8):892–901. doi:10.1080/02841850903095393.
35.
HessSFraryECGerkeOMadsenPH. State-of-the-art imaging in pulmonary embolism: ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography versus computed tomography angiography - controversies, results, and recommendations from a systematic review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016;42(8):833–845. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1593376.
36.
YuZMaoTXuY, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiology. 2018;47(12):1587–1593.
37.
GrimesDASchulzKF. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005;365(9469):1500–1505. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66422-7.
38.
WeidmanEKPlodkowskiAJHalpennyDF, et al.Dual-energy CT angiography for detection of pulmonary emboli: incremental benefit of iodine maps. Radiology. 2018;289(2):546–553. doi:10.1148/radiol.2018180594.
39.
TangCXZhangLJHanZH, et al.Dual-energy CT based vascular iodine analysis improves sensitivity for peripheral pulmonary artery thrombus detection: an experimental study in canines. EurJ Radiol. 2013;82(12):2270–2278. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.021.
