Participation in leisure is a human right and is central to the health of children and youth. The World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth supported a change in thinking about what outcomes are most relevant in the context of children’s health and places participation as one of the constituent elements of health. Participation is also a fundamental rehabilitation and health promotion outcome for children with cerebral palsy as identified by youth, parents, and health professionals. Several studies have identified individual and environmental factors related to participation in leisure; new studies are now determining the best interventions to promote participation. This article summarizes recent findings and proposes important topics for neurologists to consider in exploring leisure pursuits with children with cerebral palsy and their families and in working with rehabilitation professionals to promote engagement in leisure opportunities as part of integrated care.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Convention on the Rights of the Child. General Assembly Resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. Available at: www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/k2crc.htm. Accessed July 1, 2012.
2.
Dahan-OlielNShikako-ThomasKMajnemerA. Quality of life and leisure participation in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: a thematic analysis of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:427–439.
3.
McManusVCorcoranPPerryIJ. Participation in everyday activities and quality of life in pre-teenage children living with cerebral palsy in South West Ireland. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:50.
4.
HansenDMLarsonRWDworkinJB. What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: a survey of self-reported developmental experiences. J Res Adolesc. 2003;13:25–55.
5.
AlmqvistLHellnäsPStefanssonMGranlundM. “I can play!”Young children’s perceptions of health. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006;9:275–284.
6.
Shikako-ThomasKLachLMajnemerANimigonJCameronKShevellM. Quality of life from the perspective of adolescents with cerebral palsy: “I just think I’m a normal kid, I just happen to have a disability.”Qual Life Res. 2009;18:825–832.
7.
LivingstonMHStewartDRosenbaumPLRussellDJ. Exploring issues of participation among adolescents with cerebral palsy: what’s important to them?Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31:275–287.
8.
LarsonRHansenDMonetaG. Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Dev Psychol. 2006;42:849–863.
9.
Engel-YegerBJarusTAnabyDLawM. Differences in patterns of participation between youths with cerebral palsy and typically developing peers. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:96–104.
10.
KingGLawMHurleyPPetrenchikT. A developmental comparison of the out-of-school recreation and leisure activity participation of boys and girls with and without physical disabilities. Intl J Disabil Dev Educ. 2010;57:77–107.
11.
KingGLawMKingSRosenbaumPKertoyMKYoungNL. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003;1:63–90.
12.
SolishAPerryAMinnesP. Participation of children with and without disabilities in social, recreational and leisure activities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2010;23:226–236.
13.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Version for Children and Youth (ICF-CY). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
14.
SchiaritiVMâsseLCCiezaA. Toward the development of the international classification of functioning core sets for children with cerebral palsy: a global expert survey. J Child Neurol. 2014;29:582–591.
15.
Vargus-AdamJNMartinLK. Domains of importance for parents, medical professionals and youth with cerebral palsy considering treatment outcomes. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;37:937–948.
16.
AitchisonC. From leisure and disability to disability leisure: developing data, definitions and discourses. Disabil Soc. 2003;18:955–969.
17.
LawM. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:640–647.
18.
Shikako-ThomasKBogosianALachLShevellMMajnemerA. Parents’ perspectives of the quality of life of adolescents with cerebral palsy: choices and hope. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:2113–2122.
19.
PowrieBKolehmainenNTurpinMZivianiJ. When is “leisure” truly experienced as leisure by children with physical disabilities? An evidence synthesis of the literature. Poster presented at the 25th annual meeting of the European Academy of Childhood Disability, Newcastle, UK, October 2013.
20.
SalehMNKorner-BitenskyNSniderL. Actual vs. best practices for young children with cerebral palsy: a survey of paediatric occupational therapists and physical therapists in Quebec, Canada. Dev Neurorehabil. 2008;11:60–80.
21.
PalisanoRJBegnocheDMChiarelloLA. Amount and focus of physical therapy and occupational therapy for young children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012;32:368–382.
22.
CassidyT. All work and no play: a focus on leisure times as a means for promoting health. Couns Psychol Q. 1996;1:77–90.
23.
GinsburgKR. The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics. 2007;119:182–191.
24.
HarrisonPANarayanG. Differences in behavior, psychological factors, and environmental factors associated with participation in school sports and other activities in adolescence. J Sch Health. 2003;73:113–120.
25.
SpechtJKingGBrownEForisC. The importance of leisure in the lives of persons with congenital physical disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:436–445.
26.
Shikako-ThomasKDahan-OlielNShevellM. Play and be happy? Leisure participation and quality of life in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:387280.
27.
LawMFinkelmanSHurleyP. Participation of children with physical disabilities: relationships with diagnosis, physical function, and demographic variables. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;11;156–162.
28.
SimeonssonRJCarlsonDHuntingtonGS. Students with disabilities: a national survey of participation in school activities. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23: 49–63.
29.
KingGMcdougallJDewitD. Predictors of change over time in the activity participation of children and youth with physical disabilities. Child Care Health Dev. 2009;38:321–51.
30.
SamdahlDM. A symbolic interactionist model of leisure: theory and empirical support. Leis Sci. 2012;July:37–41.
31.
ColverA. Quality of life and participation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:656–659.
32.
FletcherANickersonPWrightK. Structured leisure activities in middle childhood: links to well-being. J Commun Psychol. 2010;31:641–659.
33.
LarsonRHansenDMonetaG. Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Dev Psychol. 2006;42:849–863.
34.
CaldwellLWittP. Leisure, recreation, and play from a developmental context. New Dir Youth Dev. 2011;130:13–27.
35.
LarsonR. How U.S. children and adolescents spend time: what it does (and doesn’t) tell us about their development. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001;10:160–164.
36.
KingGLawMKingS. Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment; 2004.
37.
PassmoreAFrenchD. Development and administration of a measure to assess adolescents’ participation in leisure activities. Adolescence. 2001;36:67–75.
38.
KingGPetrenchikTDewitDMcDougallJHurleyPLawM. Out-of-school time activity participation profiles of children with physical disabilities: a cluster analysis. Child. 2010;36:726–741.
39.
FerrarKChangCLiMOldsT. Adolescent time use clusters: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:259–270.
40.
Shikako-ThomasKMajnemerALawMLachL. Determinants of participation in leisure activities in children and youth with cerebral palsy: systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008;28:155–69.
41.
ImmsC. Children with cerebral palsy participate: a review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1867–1884.
42.
BultMKVerschurenOJongmansMJ. What influences participation in leisure activities of children and youth with physical disabilities? A systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:1521–1529.
43.
LawMKingGKingS. Patterns of participation in recreational and leisure activities among children with complex physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:337–342.
44.
MajnemerAShevellMLawM. Participation and enjoyment of leisure activities in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:751–758.
45.
Shikako-ThomasKShevellMLachL. Picture me playing-a portrait of participation and enjoyment of leisure activities in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:1001–1010.
46.
PalisanoRJChiarelloLAOrlinM. Determinants of intensity of participation in leisure and recreational activities by children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:142–149.
47.
KangLJPalisanoRJOrlinMN. Determinants of social participation—with friends and others who are not family members—For youths with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1743–1757.
48.
PalisanoRJOrlinMChiarelloLA. Determinants of intensity of participation in leisure and recreational activities by youth with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1468–1476.
49.
Shikako-ThomasKShevellMSchmitzN. Determinants of participation in leisure activities among adolescents with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:2621–2634.
50.
OrlinMNPalisanoRJChiarelloLA. Participation in home, extracurricular, and community activities among children and young people with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:160–166.
51.
ChiarelloLAPalisanoRJBartlettDJMcCoySW. A multivariate model of determinants of change in gross-motor abilities and engagement in self-care and play of young children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31:150–168.
52.
Shikako-ThomasKShevellMLachL. Are you doing what you want to do? Leisure preferences of adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. Epub ahead of print 19 Jul 2013.
53.
BultMVerschurenOLindemanEJongmansMKetelaarM. Do children participate in the activities they prefer? A comparison of children and youth with and without physical disabilities. Clin Rehabil. 2013. Epub ahead of print 10 Oct 2013.
54.
KantoomaMPurtsiJTaanilaAM. Suspected motor problems and low preference for active play in childhood are associated with physical inactivity and low fitness in adolescence. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14554.
55.
Magill-EvansJPainKAdkinsRKratochvilM. Are families with adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy the same as other families?Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:466–472.
56.
MajnemerAShikako-ThomasKLachL. Mastery motivation in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:3384–3392.
57.
ShannonCS. Parents’ messages about the role of extracurricular and unstructured leisure activities: adolescents' perceptions. J Leis Res. 2006;38:398–420.
58.
WilhiteB. Perceptions of youth with and without disabilities: implications for inclusive leisure programs and services. Ther Recreation J. 1999;33:15–28.
59.
ColverAThyenUArnaudC. Association between participation in life situations of children with cerebral palsy and their physical, social, and attitudinal environment: a cross-sectional multicenter European study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:2154–2164.
60.
AnabyDHandCBradleyL. The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1589–1598.
61.
McMeekingD, Purkayastha B. “I can’t have my mom running me everywhere”: adolescents, leisure, and accessibility. J Leis Res. 1995;27:360–378.
62.
LongoEBadiabMOrgazcBM. Patterns and predictors of participation in leisure activities outside of school in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:266–275.
63.
UllenhagABultMKNyquistA. An international comparison of patterns of participation in leisure activities for children with and without disabilities in Sweden, Norway and the Netherlands. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15:369–385.
64.
ColverAFDickinsonHOParkinsonK. Access of children with cerebral palsy to the physical, social and attitudinal environment they need: a cross-sectional European study. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:28–35.
65.
DickinsonHOColverA. Quantifying the physical, social and attitudinal environment of children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:36–50.
66.
WelshBJarvisSHammalDColverA. How might districts identify local barriers to participation for children with cerebral palsy?Public Health. 2006;120:167–175.
67.
Shikako-ThomasKLawM.[Poster]. Policies supporting participation in leisure for children with disabilities in Canada. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, 2014.
68.
StephensonRMcCollMA. A scoping review of disability policy in Canada: effects on community integration for people with spinal cord injuries. Queens University; 2008.
69.
MurphyNCarbonePS. Promoting the participation of children with disabilities in sports, recreation, and physical activities. Pediatrics. 2008;121:1057–1061.
70.
NovakIMcIntyreSMorganC. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:885–910.
71.
NovakI. Advancing the evidence and the right to participation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33:421–425.
72.
MsallME. Promoting function and participation to improve living a life with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:877–878.
73.
KatalinicOMHarveyLAHerbertRDMoseleyAMLanninNASchurrK. Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(9):CD007455.
74.
FrankiIDesloovereKaatDe CatJ. The evidence-base for basic physical therapy techniques targeting lower limb function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a conceptual framework. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:385–395.
75.
HendersonSSkeltonHRosenbaumP. Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: impact on child and caregiver function. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:89–98.
76.
LivingstoneRPalegG. Practice considerations for the introduction and use of power mobility for children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:210–221.
77.
RagonesiCBGallowayJC. Short-term, early intensive power mobility training: case report of an infant at risk for cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2012;24:141–148.
78.
LarinHMDennisCWStansfieldS. Development of robotic mobility for infants: rationale and outcomes. Physiotherapy. 2012;98:230–237.
79.
MillarDCLightJCSchlosserRW. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;49:248–264.
80.
SakzewskiLZivianiJBoydR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic management of upper-limb dysfunction in children with congenital hemiplegia. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e1111–e1122.
81.
DamianoDLDeJongSL. A systematic review of the effectiveness of treadmill training and body weight support in pediatric rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33:27–44.
82.
HendersonGEChurchillLRDavisAM. Clinical trials and medical care: Defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e324.
83.
PickeringDMHorrocksLVisserKToddG. Adapted bikes—what children and young people with cerebral palsy told us about their participation in adapted dynamic cycling. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;18;30–37.
84.
van StralenMMYildirimMte VeldeSJ. What works in school-based energy balance behaviour interventions and what does not? A systematic review of mediating mechanisms. Int J Obes. 2011;35:1251–1265.
85.
NixonCAMooreHJDouthwaiteWGibsonLVogeleC. Identifying effective behavioural models and behaviour change strategies underpinning preschool- and school-based obesity prevention interventions aimed at 4–6-year-olds: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2012;13(suppl 1):106–117.
86.
JohnstonM. Models of disability. Psychologist. 1996;12:131–141.
87.
KolehmainenNFrancisJJRamsayCR. Participation in physical play and leisure: developing a theory- and evidence-based intervention for children with motor impairments. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11.
88.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonM. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.
89.
GrahamFRodgerSZivianiJ. Coaching parents to enable children's participation: an approach for working with parents and their children. Aust Occup Ther J.: Paediatrics. 2009;56:16–23.
90.
MaherCAWilliamsMTOldsTLaneA. An internet-based physical activity intervention for adolescents with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:448–455.
91.
KetelaarMVermeerAHartH. Effects of a functional therapy program on motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1534–1545.
92.
LawMCDarrahJPollockN. Focus on function: a cluster, randomized controlled trial comparing child- versus context-focused intervention for young children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:621–629.
93.
GalvinJMcDonaldRCatroppaCAndersonV. Does intervention using virtual reality improve upper limb function in children with neurological impairment: a systematic review of the evidence. Brain Inj. 2011;25:435–442
94.
BiddissEIrwinJ. Active video games to promote physical activity in children and youth: a systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164:664–672.
95.
KolehmainenNMacLennanGTernentL. Using shared goal setting to improve access and equity: a mixed methods study of the Good Goals intervention in children’s occupational therapy. Imp Sci. 2012;7:76.
96.
PalisanoRJChiarelloLAKingGA. Participation-based therapy for children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1041–1052.
97.
BeckungEHagbergG. Neuroimpairments, activity limitations, and participations restrictions in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:309–316.
98.
VoormanJMDallmeijerAJSchuengelC. Activities and participation of 9-13 year old children with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:937–948.
99.
ColverAFDickinsonHO. Study protocol: determinants of participation and quality of life of adolescents with cerebral palsy: a longitudinal study (SPARCLE2). BMC Public Health. 2010;10:280.
100.
CraigPDieppePMacintyreS. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council. 2008.
101.
PiskurBBeurskensAJJongmansMJ. Parents' actions, challenges, and needs while enabling participation of children with a physical disability: a scoping review. BMC Pediatr. 2012;8:177.
102.
RosenbaumPGorterJW. The “F-words” in childhood disability: I swear this is how we should think!Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:457–463.
