LOCFAS–Assessed Evolution of Cognitive and Behavioral Functioning in a Sample of Pediatric Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury in the Postacute Phase
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2015
LOCFAS–Assessed Evolution of Cognitive and Behavioral Functioning in a Sample of Pediatric Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury in the Postacute Phase
We studied 86 patients with severe acquired brain injuries of different etiology, aged 0 to 18 years, in a condition of vegetative state or minimally conscious state. During neurorehabilitation, we administered the Level of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale every 2 weeks in order to describe and compare the progressive improvement in their cognitive-behavioral functioning and responsiveness in different etiologies. Patients with traumatic brain injury showed more favorable clinical outcomes. The higher the level of functioning at the first evaluation, the better the outcome, and the higher the Glasgow Coma Scale score, the higher the Level of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale level reached at the end of hospitalization. Patients with an apparently stable clinical picture, too, showed a change in their ability to interact with the environment. This study underlines the importance of an individualized and early cognitive-behavioral intervention protocol that can reveal minimal and fluctuating responses.
KerrZYHarmonKJMarshallSWProescholdbellSKWallerAE. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries treated in emergency departments in North Carolina, 2010-2011. N C Med J. 2014;75:8–14.
2.
KoepsellTDRivaraFPVavilalaMS. Incidence and descriptive epidemiologic features of traumatic brain injury in King County, Washington. Pediatrics. 2011;128:946–954.
3.
KeenanHTBrattonSL. Epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurosci. 2006;28:256–263.
4.
FoxJJBernatJLLaureysSRacineE. Disorders of consciousness: responding to requests for novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:732–738.
5.
PaganiMLeonardiMCovelliVGiovannettiAMSattinD. Risk factors for mortality in 600 patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states. J Neurol. 2014;261:1144–1152.
6.
The Royal College of Physician. The vegetative state: guidance of diagnosis and management. A report of a working party of the Royal College of the Physician. Clin Med. 2003;3:249–254.
7.
MontiMLaureysSOwenM. The vegetative state. Br Med J. 2010;341:article c3765.
8.
GiacinoJTAshwalSChildsN. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58:349–353.
9.
StraussDJAshwalSDaySM. Life expectancy of children in vegetative and minimally conscious state. Pediatr Neurol. 2000;23:312–319.
10.
CopeNHallK. Head injury remediation: benefits of early intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:433–437.
11.
JørgensenHS.Hospital remediation of patients with severe brain injuries. Prognosis and effect of early intensive, specialized remediation. Ugeskr Laeger. 1997;159:4093–4098.
12.
LiscioMAdduciAGalbiatiS. Cognitive-behavioral stimulation protocol for severely brain-damaged patients in the post-acute stage in developmental age. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:275–285.
13.
EifertBMaurer-KarattupPSchorlM. Integration of intensive care treatment and neurorehabilitation in patients with disorders of consciousness: a program description and case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1924–1933.
14.
JørgensenHS.Hospital rehabilitation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Current status and organization in Denmark and abroad. Ugeskr Laeger. 1997;159:4089–4092.
15.
HoffmannBDüweckeCvon WildKR. Neurological and social long-term outcome after early rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. 5-year report on 240 TBI patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;79:33–35.
16.
Lippert-GrünerMWedekindCKlugN. Outcome of prolonged coma following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003;17:49–54.
17.
HirschbergRGiacinoJT. The vegetative and the minimally conscious states: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Neurol Clin. 2011;29:773–786.
18.
LombardiFTariccoMDe TantiA. Sensory stimulation of brain injured individuals in coma or vegetative state: results of a Cochrane systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:464–472.
19.
WhiteJ. Treatments to enhance recovery from the vegetative and minimally conscious state: ethical issue surrounding efficacy studies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:86–92.
20.
DomanGWilkinsonRDimanescuMD. The effect of intense multisensory stimulation on coma arousal and recovery. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1993;3:203–212.
21.
Di StefanoCCortesiAMasottiS. Increased behavioural responsiveness with complex stimulation in VS and MCS: preliminary results. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1250–1256.
22.
LotzeMSchertelKBirbaumerN. A long-term intensive behavioral treatment study in patients with persistent vegetative state or minimally conscious state. Rehabil Med. 2011;43:230–236.
23.
MeythalerJMBrunnerRCJohnsonA. Amantadine to improve neurorecovery in traumatic brain injury-associated diffuse axonal injury: a pilot double-blind randomized trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17:300–313.
24.
GiacinoJTWhyteJBagiellaE. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:819–826.
25.
SenANCampbellPGYadlaS. Deep brain stimulation in the management of disorders of consciousness: a review of physiology, previous reports, and ethical considerations. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29:E14.
26.
SchiffNDGiacinoJTVictorJD. Behavioral improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature. 2007;448:600–603.
27.
FlanneryJ. Using the levels of cognitive functioning assessment scale with patients with traumatic brain injury in an acute care setting. Remediation Nurs. 1998;23:88–94.
28.
FlanneryJLandK. Teaching acute care nurses cognitive assessment using LOCFAS: what's the best method?J Neurosci Nurs. 2001;33:50–56.
29.
FlanneryJ. The Levels of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale. In: StricklandODiIorioC, eds. Measurement of Nursing Outcomes, 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2003:34–56.
30.
MazzucchiA, eds. La riabilitazione neuropsicologica dei traumatizzati cranici. 2nd ed. Milano: Masson; 1997.
31.
SliferKJCataldoMDBabbitRL. Behavior analysis and intervention during hospitalization for brain trauma remediation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:810–817.
PerselCSPerselCHAshleyMJ. The use of noncontingent reinforcement and contingent restraint to reduce physical aggression and self-injurious behaviour in a traumatically brain injured adult. Brain Inj. 1997;11:751–760.
34.
TeasdaleGJennettB. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–84.
35.
GouvierWDBlantonPDKittleKS. Reliability and validity of the Expanded Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Stover-Zieger Scale. Int J Clin Neuropsychol. 1986;8:1–2.
36.
WilsonJTLPettigrewLELTeasdaleGM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1997;15:573–585.
37.
AshwalSCranfordR. The minimally conscious state in children. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2002;9:19–34.
38.
AshwalS. Medical aspects of the minimally conscious state in children. Brain Dev. 2003;25:535–545.
39.
RosenthalMGriffithERKreutzerJS. eds. Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury. Philadelphia, PA: Davis; 1999.
40.
ChoiJHJakobMStapfC. Multimodal early rehabilitation and predictors of outcome in survivors of severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2008;65:1028–1035.
41.
AndelicNBautz-HolterERonningR. Does an early onset and continuous chain of rehabilitation improve the long-term functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury?J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:66–74.
42.
SeelRTDouglasJDennisonAC. Specialized early treatment for persons with disorders of consciousness: program components and outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1908–1923.
43.
CorriganJDSelassieAWOrmanJA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25:72–80.
44.
McKinlayAGraceRCHorwoodLJ. Prevalence of traumatic brain injury among children, adolescents and young adults: prospective evidence from a birth cohort. Brain Inj. 2008;22:175–181.
45.
WongCPForsythRJKellyTP. Incidence, aetiology, and outcome of non-traumatic coma: a population based study. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84:193–199.
46.
HeindlUTLaubMC. Outcome of persistent vegetative state following hypoxic or traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents. Neuropediatrics. 1996;27:94–100.
47.
WhiteJRFarukhiZBullC. Predictors of outcome in severely head-injured children. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:534–540.
48.
DucrocqSCMeyerPGOrliaguetGA. Epidemiology and early predictive factors of mortality and outcome in children with traumatic severe brain injury: experience of a French pediatric trauma center. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7:461–467.
49.
GiovannettiAMPaganiMSattinD. Children in vegetative state and minimally conscious state: patients’ condition and caregivers’ burden. Sci World J. 2012;2012:232149.
