Vibratory feedback can be a useful tool for rehabilitation. We examined its use in children with dystonia to understand how it affects muscle activity in a population that does not respond well to standard rehabilitation. We predicted scaled vibration (ie, vibration that was directly or inversely proportional to muscle activity) would increase use of the vibrated muscle because of task-relevant sensory information, whereas nonscaled vibration would not change muscle use. The study was conducted on 11 subjects with dystonia and 14 controls. Each subject underwent 4 different types of vibration on the more dystonic biceps muscle (or nondominant arm in controls) in a 1-dimensional, bimanual myocontrol task. Our results showed that only scaled vibratory feedback could bias muscle use without changing overall performance in children with dystonia. We believe there may be a role in rehabilitation for scaled vibratory feedback to retrain abnormal muscle patterns.
SangerTD. Toward a definition of childhood dystonia. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004;16:623–627.
2.
BertuccoMSangerTD. Current and emerging strategies for treatment of childhood dystonia. J Hand Ther. 2015;28:185–193.
3.
GeyerHLBressmanSB. The diagnosis of dystonia. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:780–790.
4.
HallettM. Pathophysiology of writer’s cramp. Hum Mov Sci. 2006;25:454–463.
5.
ZeunerKEBara-JimenezWNoguchiPS. Sensory training for patients with focal hand dystonia. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:593–598.
6.
SangerTDKukkeSN. Abnormalities of tactile sensory function in children with dystonic and diplegic cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:289–293.
7.
GordonAMHungY-CBrandaoM. Bimanual training and constraint-induced movement therapy in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:692–702.
8.
BhanpuriNHBertuccoMFermanD. Deep brain stimulation evoked potentials may relate to clinical benefit in childhood dystonia. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:718–726.
9.
BhanpuriNHBertuccoMYoungSJ. Multiday transcranial direct current stimulation causes clinically insignificant changes in childhood dystonia: a pilot study. J Child Neurol. 2015;30:1604–1615.
10.
YoungSJBertuccoMSangerTD. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in children with dystonia: a sham-controlled study. J Child Neurol. 2014;29:232–239.
11.
YoungSJBertuccoMSheehan-StrossRSangerTD. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in children with dystonia: a pilot open-label trial. J Child Neurol. 2013;28:1238–1244.
12.
RobertMTGuberekRSveistrupHLevinMF. Motor learning in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and the role of sensation in short-term motor training of goal-directed reaching. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:1121–1128.
13.
SigristRRauterGRienerRWolfP. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013;20:21–53.
14.
YoungSJvan DoornikJSangerTD. Visual feedback reduces co-contraction in children with dystonia. J Child Neurol. 2011;26:37–43.
15.
KossevASiggelkowSKapelsH. Crossed effects of muscle vibration on motor-evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:453–456.
16.
MarconiBFilippiGMKochG. Long-term effects on cortical excitability and motor recovery induced by repeated muscle vibration in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:48–60.
17.
PaoloniMTaverneseEFiniM. Segmental muscle vibration modifies muscle activation during reaching in chronic stroke: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35:405–414.
18.
RosenkranzKRothwellJC. Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans. J Physiol. 2003;551(pt 2):649–660.
19.
BockOPipereitKMierauA. A method to reversibly degrade proprioceptive feedback in research on human motor control. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;160:246–250.
20.
ConradMOScheidtRASchmitBD. Effects of wrist tendon vibration on arm tracking in people poststroke. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:1480–1488.
21.
van DijkHJanninkMJAHermensHJ. Effect of augmented feedback on motor function of the affected upper extremity in rehabilitation patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:202–211.
22.
BloomRPrzekopASangerTD. Prolonged electromyogram biofeedback improves upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2010;25:1480–1484.
23.
RosenkranzKRothwellJC. Modulation of proprioceptive integration in the motor cortex shapes human motor learning. J Neurosci. 2012;32:9000–9006.
24.
BrooksVB. The Neural Basis of Motor Control. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
25.
LatashMLScholzJPSchonerG. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002;30:26–31.
FittsPM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol. 1954;47:381–391.
28.
LunardiniFBertuccoMCasellatoC. Speed-accuracy trade-off in a trajectory-constrained self-feeding task: a quantitative index of unsuppressed motor noise in children with dystonia. J Child Neurol. 2015;30:1676–1685.
29.
BertuccoMSangerTD. Speed-accuracy testing on the Apple iPad provides a quantitative test of upper extremity motor performance in children with dystonia. J Child Neurol. 2014;29:1460–1466.
30.
BarryMJVanSwearingenJMAlbrightAL. Reliability and responsiveness of the Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;41:404–411.
31.
SangerTD. Bayesian filtering of myoelectric signals. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:1839–1845.
32.
MacKenzieISSoukoreffRW. Card, English, and Burr (1978)—25 years later. Paper presented at: ACM2003; New York.
33.
MilnerTEFranklinDW. Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans. J Physiol. 2005;567(pt 2):651–664.
34.
CohenJCohenPWestSGAikenLS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
35.
AkaikeH. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19:716–723.
36.
BertuccoMBhanpuriNHSangerTD. Perceived cost and intrinsic motor variability modulate the speed-accuracy trade-off. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139988.
AvanzinoLPelosinEAbbruzzeseG. Shaping motor cortex plasticity through proprioception. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:2807–2814.
39.
AvanzinoLFiorioM. Proprioceptive dysfunction in focal dystonia: from experimental evidence to rehabilitation strategies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1000.
