Macro/microporous silk/nano-sized calcium phosphate scaffolds (SC16) with bioactive and superior physicochemical properties are currently being developed. In this study, we evaluated the new bone formation ability in rat femur of the SC16 scaffolds in vivo, using silk fibroin scaffolds (S16) as control. The CaP distribution profile in the scaffolds was characterized by micro-computed tomography and the CaP phase was found to be distributed homogeneously in the SC16 scaffolds. Mineralization was only observed in SC16 scaffolds, and both scaffolds gradually degraded with time. By staining the explants, new bone growth was observed directly on the SC16 surface and with higher density than that observed on the S16 scaffolds. These results demonstrated that the SC16 hybrid scaffolds are osteoconductive and can be good candidates for bone tissue engineering as they promote superior de novo bone formation.
HutmacherDWSchantzJTLamCX. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J Tissue Eng Regen M2007; 1: 245–260.
5.
KarageorgiouVKaplanDL. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials2005; 26: 5474–5491.
OliveiraJMSilvaSSMalafayaPB. Macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications: physicochemical characterization and assessment of rat bone marrow stromal cell viability. J Biomed Mater Res A2009; 91: 175–186.
10.
YanLPWangYJRenL. Genipin-cross-linked collagen/chitosan biomimetic scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A2010; 95: 465–475.
11.
OliveiraALSunLKimHJ. Aligned silk-based 3-D architectures for contact guidance in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2012; 8: 1530–1542.
12.
YanLPOliveiraJMOliveiraAL. Macro/microporous silk fibroin scaffolds with potential for articular cartilage and meniscus tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater2012; 8: 289–301.
13.
OliveiraJMKotobukiNTadokoroM. Ex vivo culturing of stromal cells with dexamethasone-loaded carboxymethylchitosan/poly(amidoamine) dendrimer nanoparticles promotes ectopic bone formation. Bone2010; 46: 1424–1435.
14.
KimHJKimUJKimHS. Bone tissue engineering with premineralized silk scaffolds. Bone2008; 42: 1226–1234.
15.
MottaABarbatoBFossC. Stabilization of Bombyx mori silk fibroin/sericin films by crosslinking with PEG-DE 600 and genipin. J Bioact Compat Polym2011; 26: 130–143.
16.
BhumiratanaSGraysonWLCastanedaA. Nucleation and growth of mineralized bone matrix on silk-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. Biomaterials2011; 32: 2812–2820.
17.
RezwanKChenQZBlakerJJ. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials2006; 27: 3413–3431.
18.
LiuLLiuJYWangMQ. Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/silk fibroin porous scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2008; 19: 325–338.
19.
ZhangYFWuCFriisT. The osteogenic properties of CaP/silk composite scaffolds. Biomaterials2010; 31: 2848–2856.
VepariCKaplanDL. Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci2007; 32: 991–1007.
23.
KunduBKunduSC. Osteogenesis of human stem cells in silk biomaterial for regenerative therapy. Prog Polym Sci2010; 35: 1116–1127.
24.
MandalBBKunduSC. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow cells on non-mulberry and mulberry silk gland fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials2009; 30: 5019–5030.
25.
FuchsSJiangXSchmidtH. Dynamic processes involved in the pre-vascularization of silk fibroin constructs for bone regeneration using outgrowth endothelial cells. Biomaterials2009; 30: 1329–1338.
26.
FiniMMottaATorricelliP. The healing of confined critical size cancellous defects in the presence of silk fibroin hydrogel. Biomaterials2005; 26: 3527–3536.
GomesSLeonorIBManoJF. Natural and genetically engineered proteins for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci2012; 37: 1–17.
31.
MandalBBGrinbergAGilES. High-strength silk protein scaffolds for bone repair. P Natl Acad Sci2012; 109: 7699–7704.
32.
MakayaKTeradaSOhgoK. Comparative study of silk fibroin porous scaffolds derived from salt/water and sucrose/hexafluoroisopropanol in cartilage formation. J Biosci Bioeng2009; 108: 68–75.
33.
MandalBBKunduSC. Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials2009; 30: 2956–2965.
34.
CorreiaCBhumiratanaSYanLP. Development of silk-based scaffolds for tissue engineering of bone from human adipose-derived stem cells. Acta Biomater2012; 8: 2483–2492.
35.
MandalBBKunduSC. Non-mulberry silk gland fibroin protein 3-D scaffold for enhanced differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteocytes. Acta Biomater2009; 5: 2579–2590.
36.
OliveiraALSampaioSCSousaRA. Controlled mineralization of nature-inspired silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite hybrid bioactive scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. In: 20th European conference on biomaterials, Nantes, France, 27 September–1 October 2006.
37.
YanLPSilva-CorreiaJCorreiaC. Bioactive macro/micro porous silk fibroin/nano-sized calcium phosphate scaffolds with potential for bone tissue engineering application. Nanomedicine2013; 8: 359–378.
38.
OliveiraALMalafayaPBCostaSA. Micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) as a potential tool to assess the effect of dynamic coating routes on the formation of biomimetic apatite layers on 3D-plotted biodegradable polymeric scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater M2007; 18: 211–223.
39.
SalgadoAJCoutinhoOPReisRL. In vivo response to starch-based scaffolds designed for bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A2007; 80: 983–989.
40.
JinHJKaplanDL. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature2003; 24: 1057–1061.
41.
KimUJParkJLiCM. Structure and properties of silk hydrogels. Biomacromolecules2004; 5: 786–792.
42.
AsakuraTKuzuharaATabetaR. Conformational characterization of Bombyx mori silk fibroin in the solid state by high-frequency carbon-13 cross polarization-magic angle spinning NMR, X-ray diffraction, and infrared spectroscopy. Macromolecules1985; 18: 1841–1845.
43.
JinHJParkJKarageorgiouV. Water-stable silk films with reduced β-sheet content. Adv Funct Mater2005; 15: 1241–1247.
44.
StoppatoMCarlettiESidarovichV. Influence of scaffold pore size on collagen I development: a new in vitro evaluation perspective. J Bioact Compat Polym2013; 28: 16–32.
45.
DuarteARManoJFReisRL. Perspectives on: supercritical fluid technology for 3D tissue engineering scaffold applications. J Bioact Compat Polym2009; 24: 385–400.
46.
KokuboTTakadamaH. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?Biomaterials2006; 27: 2907–2915.
