As a microscale three-dimensional bionic model, a microtissue array is a promising method for disease modeling and drug screening. Digital light processing (DLP) 3D bio-printing technology with the capabilities of excellent printing speed and resolution shows great potential for fabricating microtissue arrays. However, the outcomes of the microtissue arrays using DLP are limited by the shortage of biomaterials. In this work, we prepare hydrogel microtissues by combining DLP printing technology with biphasic bio-ink consisting of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and dextran. GelMA/ dextran is mixed to form bio-inks with different volume ratios, which can achieve high-precision printing of various patterns. Due to the presence of dextran, the bio-inks form the internal porous structure of the hydrogel in the printed patterns. The pore size is related to the proportion of dextran in bio-inks, and the pore size of hydrogel becomes smaller with the increase of dextran ratio. In addition, the adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) cells encapsulated in the porous hydrogels can maintain a high survival rate of 98.01% after 3 days of culture, and the larger pore size in the hydrogels promotes cell migration. Combining the DLP printing system with the porous hydrogel allows multiple micro-size geometric pattern hydrogels to be printed simultaneously to form microtissue arrays. In this study, a new bio-ink suitable for microtissue arrays is proposed, and a simple, accurate, and high-throughput biological manufacturing method for microtissue arrays is developed, thus providing a valuable tool for drug screening and tissue engineering.
WongCHSiahKWLoAW.Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics2019; 20(2): 273–286.
2.
KehindeEO.They see a rat, we seek a cure for diseases: the current status of animal experimentation in medical practice. Med Princ Pract2013; 22(Suppl 1)): 52–61.
3.
KimuraHSakaiYFujiiT.Organ/body-on-a-chip based on microfluidic technology for drug discovery. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet2018; 33(1): 43–48.
4.
TakaoKMiyakawaT.Genomic responses in mouse models greatly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2015; 112(4): 1167–1172.
5.
CaoRLiNTLatourS, et al. An automation workflow for high-throughput manufacturing and analysis of scaffold-supported 3D tissue arrays. Adv Healthc Mater2023; 12(19): 1–19.
6.
Munoz-PerezERubio-RetamaJCussóL, et al. 3D-printed Laponite/Alginate hydrogel-based suppositories for versatile drug loading and release. Drug Deliv Transl Res2024January7.
7.
MaYJiYHuangG, et al. Bioprinting 3D cell-laden hydrogel microarray for screening human periodontal ligament stem cell response to extracellular matrix. Biofabrication2015; 7(4): 1–9.
8.
RandoO.Printing microarrays. Cold Spring Harb Protoc2019; 2019(9): 665–669.
9.
DatarAJoshiPLeeMY.Biocompatible hydrogels for microarray cell printing and encapsulation. Biosensors2015; 5(4): 647–663.
10.
LohaszCLoretanJSterkerD, et al. A microphysiological cell-culturing system for pharmacokinetic drug exposure and high-resolution imaging of arrays of 3D microtissues. Front Pharmacol2021; 12: 1–17.
11.
PappKSzittnerZPrechlJ.Life on a microarray: assessing live cell functions in a microarray format. Cell Mol Life Sci2012; 69(16): 2717–2725.
12.
ChenYJYangCMHuangJS, et al. An introduction of an easy-operating and economical technique for tissue microarray preparation. J Clin Pathol2020; 73(7): 403–407.
13.
LowLAMummeryCBerridgeBR, et al. Organs-on-chips: into the next decade. Nat Rev Drug Discov2021; 20(5): 345–361.
14.
YuJLeeSSongJ, et al. Perfusable micro-vascularized 3D tissue array for high-throughput vascular phenotypic screening. Nano Converg2022; 9(1): 16.
15.
ZhangPLiuCModaviC, et al. Printhead on a chip: empowering droplet-based bioprinting with microfluidics. Trends Biotechnol2024 March; 42(3): 353–368.
16.
BillietTVandenhauteMSchelfhoutJ, et al. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials2012; 33(26): 6020–6041.
17.
TarassoliSPJessopZMAl-SabahA, et al. Skin tissue engineering using 3D bioprinting: an evolving research field. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2018; 71(5): 615–623.
18.
ZhouJLiQTianZ, et al. Recent advances in 3D bioprinted cartilage-mimicking constructs for applications in tissue engineering. Mater Today Bio2023; 23: 1–22.
19.
XiaoXYangYLaiY, et al. Customization of an ultrafast thiol-norbornene photo-cross-linkable hyaluronic acid-gelatin bioink for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Biomacromolecules2023; 24(11): 5414–5427.
20.
NgWLHuangXShkolnikovV, et al. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bioink: influence of bioink properties on printing performance and cell proliferation during inkjet-based bioprinting. Des Manuf2023; 6(6): 676–690.
21.
SuwannakotPZhuLTolentinoMAK, et al. Electrostatically cross-linked bioinks for jetting-based bioprinting of 3D cell cultures. ACS Appl Bio Mater2024; 7: 269–283.
22.
MohammadrezaeiDPodinaLSilvaJ, et al. Cell viability prediction and optimization in extrusion-based bioprinting via neural network-based Bayesian optimization models. Biofabrication2024; 16: 1–16.
23.
BoularaouiSAl HusseinGKhanKA, et al. An overview of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on induced shear stress and its effect on cell viability. Bioprinting2020; 20(24): e00093.
24.
ZhuLChengCLiuS, et al. Advancements and application prospects of three-dimensional models for primary liver cancer: a comprehensive review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2023; 11: 1–11.
25.
NgWLLeeJMZhouM, et al. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication2020; 12(2): 022001.
26.
LiYZhangXZhangX, et al. Recent progress of the vat photopolymerization technique in tissue engineering: A Brief Review of mechanisms, methods, materials, and Applications. Polymers2023; 15(19): 3940.
27.
FangZShiYZhangY, et al. Reconfigurable polymer networks for digital light processing 3D printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13(13): 15584–15590.
28.
LeeGHLeeJSWangX, et al. Bottom-up engineering of well-defined 3D microtissues using microplatforms and biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater2016; 5(1): 56–74.
29.
SuCChuahYJOngHB, et al. A facile and scalable hydrogel patterning method for microfluidic 3D cell culture and Spheroid-in-Gel culture array. Biosensors2021; 11(12): 509.
30.
WangMLiWLuoZ, et al. A multifunctional micropore-forming bioink with enhanced anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. Biofabrication2022; 14(2): 1–24.
31.
LiuTWengWZhangY, et al. Applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels in microfluidic technique-assisted tissue engineering. Molecules2020; 25(22): 5305.
32.
TaoJZhuSZhouN, et al. Nanoparticle-stabilized emulsion bioink for digital light processing based 3D bioprinting of porous tissue constructs. Adv Healthc Mater2022; 11(12): e2102810.
33.
WangYZhouXZhuS, et al. Cryoprinting of nanoparticle-enhanced injectable hydrogel with shape-memory properties. Mater Des2022; 223: 1–13.
34.
HanDHOhUParkJK.Characterization of PDMS microchannels using horizontally or vertically formed 3D-Printed molds by digital light projection. ACS Omega2023; 8(21): 19128–19136.
35.
QianYGongJLuK, et al. DLP printed hDPSC-loaded GelMA microsphere regenerates dental pulp and repairs spinal cord. Biomaterials2023; 299: 122137.
36.
MoXOuyangLXiongZ, et al. Advances in digital light processing of hydrogels. Biomed Mater2022; 17(4): 1–23.
37.
KimSHKimDYLimTH, et al. Correction to: silk fibroin bioinks for digital light processing (DLP) 3D bioprinting. Adv Exp Med Biol2020; 1249: C1.
38.
XinSWymanOMAlgeDL.Assembly of PEG microgels into porous cell-instructive 3D scaffolds via thiol-ene click chemistry. Adv Healthc Mater2018; 7(11): e1800160.
39.
LuoYWangCHossainM, et al. Three-dimensional microtissue assay for high-throughput cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Anal Chem2012; 84(15): 6731–6738.
40.
HuebschNLippensELeeK, et al. Matrix elasticity of void-forming hydrogels controls transplanted-stem-cell-mediated bone formation. Nat Mater2015; 14(12): 1269–1277.
41.
YingGLJiangNMaharjanS, et al. Aqueous Two-Phase emulsion bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of porous hydrogels. Adv Mater2018; 30(50): e1805460.
42.
NuhnJAMGongSCheX, et al. Microtissue size and cell-cell communication modulate cell migration in arrayed 3D collagen gels. Biomed Microdevices2018; 20(3): 62.
43.
LiQLiuKJiangT, et al. Injectable and self-healing chitosan-based hydrogel with MOF-loaded α-lipoic acid promotes diabetic wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2021; 131: 1–14.
44.
ZhuJLiuBWangZ, et al. Exosomes from nicotine-stimulated macrophages accelerate atherosclerosis through miR-21-3p/PTEN-mediated VSMC migration and proliferation. Theranostics2019; 9(23): 6901–6919.
45.
ShiMXuQDingL, et al. Cell infiltrative inner connected porous hydrogel improves neural stem cell migration and differentiation for functional repair of spinal cord injury. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2022; 8(12): 5307–5318.
46.
CarberryBJHergertJEYavittFM, et al. 3D printing of sacrificial thioester elastomers using digital light processing for templating 3D organoid structures in soft biomatrices. Biofabrication2021; 13(4): 1–32.
47.
JoshiPKangSYDatarA, et al. High-throughput assessment of mechanistic toxicity of chemicals in miniaturized 3D cell culture. Curr Protoc Toxicol2019; 79(1): e66.
48.
XueYLeeJKimH-J, et al. Rhodamine conjugated gelatin methacryloyl nanoparticles for stable cell imaging. ACS Appl Bio Mater2020; 3(10): 6908–6918.
49.
ZhangLJGuerrero-JuarezCFHataT, et al. Dermal adipocytes protect against invasive Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. Science2015; 347(6217): 67–71.
