Dietary fiber is widely recognized as an important part of a healthy diet and is a common addition to enteral nutrition (EN) formulas. Fiber sources differ in characteristics such as solubility, fermentability, and viscosity, and it is now well known that different types of fiber exert varying physiological effects in the body. Clinical studies suggest fiber can exert a wide range of benefits in areas such as bowel function, gut health, immunity, blood glucose control, and serum lipid levels. Although early clinical nutrition products contained fiber from a single source, it is now thought that blends of fiber from multiple sources more closely resemble a regular diet and may provide a greater range of benefits for the patient. Current recommendations support the use of dietary fiber in clinical nutrition when no contraindications exist, but little information exists about which types and combinations of fibers provide the relevant benefit in certain patient populations. This article summarizes the different types of fiber commonly added to EN products and reviews the current literature on the use of fiber blends in clinical nutrition.
SlavinJL. Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:1716-1731.
2.
ZalogaGP. Parenteral nutrition in adult inpatients with functioning gastrointestinal tracts: assessment of outcomes. Lancet. 2006;367:1101-1111.
3.
KellyTWPatrickMRHillmanKM. Study of diarrhea in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1983;11:7-9.
4.
ShankardassKChuchmachSChelswickK. Bowel function of long-term tube-fed patients consuming formulae with and without dietary fiber. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990;14:508-512.
5.
GreenCJ. Fiber in enteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2001;20(suppl 1):23-39.
6.
HijovaEChmelarovaA. Short chain fatty acids and colonic health. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2007;108:354-358.
7.
BowlingTERaimundoAHGrimbleGKSilkDB. Reversal by short-chain fatty acids of colonic fluid secretion induced by enteral feeding. Lancet. 1993;342:1266-1268.
8.
BackhedFLeyRESonnenburgJLPetersonDAGordonJI. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science. 2005;307:1915-1920.
9.
GibsonGRProbertHMLooJVRastallRARoberfroidMB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutr Res Rev. 2004;17:259-275.
SpaethGGottwaldTSpecianRDMainousMRBergRDDeitchEA. Secretory immunoglobulin A, intestinal mucin, and mucosal permeability in nutritionally induced bacterial translocation in rats. Ann Surg. 1994;220:798-808.
12.
SchleyPDFieldCJ. The immune-enhancing effects of dietary fibres and prebiotics. Br J Nutr. 2002;87(suppl 2):S221-S230.
13.
RaschkaLDanielH. Mechanisms underlying the effects of inulin-type fructans on calcium absorption in the large intestine of rats. Bone. 2005;37:728-735.
14.
BernetMFBrassartDNeeserJRServinAL. Adhesion of human bifidobacterial strains to cultured human intestinal epithelial cells and inhibition of enteropathogen-cell interactions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:4121-4128.
15.
RyzNRMeddingsJBTaylorCG. Long-chain inulin increases dendritic cells in the peyer’s patches and increases ex vivo cytokine secretion in the spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes of growing female rats, independent of zinc status. Br J Nutr. 2009;101:1653-1663.
16.
InanMSRasoulpourRJYinLHubbardAKRosenbergDWGiardinaC. The luminal short-chain fatty acid butyrate modulates NF-kappaB activity in a human colonic epithelial cell line. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:724-734.
17.
MarlettJAHosigKBVollendorfNWShinnickFLHaackVSStoryJA. Mechanism of serum cholesterol reduction by oat bran. Hepatology. 1994;20:1450-1457.
18.
HallfrischJBehallKM. Mechanisms of the effects of grains on insulin and glucose responses. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000;19:320S-325S.
19.
EliaMEngferMBGreenCJSilkDB. Systematic review and meta-analysis: the clinical and physiological effects of fibre-containing enteral formulae. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:120-145.
20.
MeierRGassullM. Consensus recommendations on the effects and benefits of fibre in clinical practice. Clin Nutr Suppl. 2004;1:73-80.
21.
LochsHAllisonSPMeierR. Introductory to the ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: terminology, definitions and general topics. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:180-186.
22.
MerrittR, ed. The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual. 2nd ed.Silver Spring, MD: A.S.P.E.N.; 2005.
23.
McClaveSAMartindaleRGVanekVW. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:277-316.
24.
Institute of Medicine Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes: Proposed Definition of Dietary Fiber (2001). Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001:22.
25.
TsaiACMottELOwenGMBennickMRLoGSSteinkeFH. Effects of soy polysaccharide on gastrointestinal functions, nutrient balance, steroid excretions, glucose tolerance, serum lipids, and other parameters in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;38:504-511.
26.
TitgemeyerECBourquinLDFaheyGCJrGarlebKA. Fermentability of various fiber sources by human fecal bacteria in vitro. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53:1418-1424.
27.
BurksAWVanderhoofJAMehraSOstromKMBaggsG. Randomized clinical trial of soy formula with and without added fiber in antibiotic-induced diarrhea. J Pediatr. 2001;139:578-582.
28.
BrownKHPerezFPeersonJM. Effect of dietary fiber (soy polysaccharide) on the severity, duration, and nutritional outcome of acute, watery diarrhea in children. Pediatrics. 1993;92:241-247.
29.
LieblBHFischerMHVan CalcarSCMarlettJA. Dietary fiber and long-term large bowel response in enterally nourished nonambulatory profoundly retarded youth. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990;14:371-375.
30.
KapadiaSARaimundoAHGrimbleGKAimerPSilkDB. Influence of three different fiber-supplemented enteral diets on bowel function and short-chain fatty acid production. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1995;19:63-68.
31.
LampeJWEffertzMELarsonJLSlavinJL. Gastrointestinal effects of modified guar gum and soy polysaccharide as part of an enteral formula diet. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:538-544.
32.
SlavinJLNelsonNLMcNamaraEACashmereK. Bowel function of healthy men consuming liquid diets with and without dietary fiber. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1985;9:317-321.
33.
FrankenfieldDCBeyerPL. Soy-polysaccharide fiber: effect on diarrhea in tube-fed, head-injured patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50:533-538.
34.
DobbGJTowlerSC. Diarrhoea during enteral feeding in the critically ill: a comparison of feeds with and without fibre. Intensive Care Med. 1990;16:252-255.
de KruifJTVosA. The influence of soyfibre supplemented tube feeding on the occurrence of diarrhoea in postoperative patients. Clin Nutr. 1993;12:360-364.
37.
ShimoniZAverbuchYShirE. The addition of fiber and the use of continuous infusion decrease the incidence of diarrhea in elderly tube-fed patients in medical wards of a general regional hospital: a controlled clinical trial. Gastroenterology. 2007;41:901-905.
38.
MaenakaTYokawaTIshiharaNGuYJunejaL. Effects of PHGG on postprandial glucose level and disaccharidase. J Jpn Soc Med Use Func Foods. 2007;4:195-201.
39.
GuYYamashitaTSuzukiIJunejaLYokawaT. Effect of enzyme hydrolyzed guar gum on the elevation of blood glucose levels after meal. Med Biol. 2003;142:19-24.
40.
GolayASchneiderHBloiseDVadasLAssalJ. The effect of a liquid supplement containing guar gum and fructose on glucose tolerance in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 1995;5:141-148.
41.
RushdiTAPichardCKhaterYH. Control of diarrhea by fiber-enriched diet in ICU patients on enteral nutrition: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1344-1352.
42.
MesejoAAcostaJAOrtegaC. Comparison of a high-protein disease-specific enteral formula with a high-protein enteral formula in hyperglycemic critically ill patients. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:295-305.
43.
VelazquezMDaviesCMarettRSlavinJFeirtagJ. Effect of oligosaccharides and fibre substitutes on short chain fatty acid production by human faecal microflora. Anaerobe. 2000;6:87-92.
44.
OkuboTIshiharaNTakahashiH. Effects of partially hydrolyzed guar gum intake on human intestinal microflora and its metabolism. Biosci Biotech Biochem. 1994;58:1364-1369.
45.
TakahashiHSungIHayashiCKimMYamanakaJYamamotoT. Effect of partially hydrolyzed guar gum on fecal output in human volunteers. Nutr Res. 1993;13:649-657.
46.
MeierRBeglingerCSchneiderHRowedderAGyrK. Effect of a liquid diet with and without soluble fiber supplementation on intestinal transit and cholecystokinin release in volunteers. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993;17:231-235.
47.
TakahashiHYangSHayaskiCKimMYamanakaJYamamotoT. Influence of partially hydrolyzed guar gum on constipation in women. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 1994;40:251-259.
48.
HomannHHKemenMFuessenichCSenkalMZumtobelV. Reduction in diarrhea incidence by soluble fiber in patients receiving total or supplemental enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1994;18:486-490.
49.
SpapenHDiltoerMVan MalderenCOpdenackerGSuysEHuyghensL. Soluble fiber reduces the incidence of diarrhea in septic patients receiving total enteral nutrition: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2001;20:301-305.
50.
NakaoMOguraYSatakeS. Usefulness of soluble dietary fiber for the treatment of diarrhea during enteral nutrition in elderly patients. Nutrition. 2002;18:35-39.
51.
PatrickPGGohmanSMMarxSCDeLeggeMHGreenbergNA. Effect of supplements of partially hydrolyzed guar gum on the occurrence of constipation and use of laxative agents. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98:912-914.
52.
SarianoCHiblerKMaxeyK. Long-term fiber intervention program: reduction in enema use at a developmental care facility. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:A82.
53.
CherbutCMichelCRaisonVKravtchenkoTPSeverineM. Acacia gum is a bifidogenic dietary fibre with high digestive tolerance in healthy humans. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2003;15:43-50.
54.
RochatFOlivierBAlfredJ, inventors; NestecS.A., assignee. Method of treating irritable bowel syndrome. US patent 7141554. November28, 2006.
55.
CalameWWeselerARViebkeCFlynnCSiemensmaAD. Gum arabic establishes prebiotic functionality in healthy human volunteers in a dose-dependent manner. Br J Nutr. 2008;100:1269-1275.
56.
WapnirRAWingertzahnMAMoyseJTeichbergS. Gum arabic promotes rat jejunal sodium and water absorption from oral rehydration solutions in two models of diarrhea. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1979-1985.
57.
BlissDZSteinTPSchleiferCRSettleRG. Supplementation with gum arabic fiber increases fecal nitrogen excretion and lowers serum urea nitrogen concentration in chronic renal failure patients consuming a low-protein diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;63:392-398.
58.
RossAHEastwoodMABrydonWGAndersonJRAndersonDM. A study of the effects of dietary gum arabic in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;37:368-375.
59.
KellyG. Inulin-type prebiotics: a review (part 2). Altern Med Rev. 2009;14:36-55.
60.
KolidaSGibsonGR. Prebiotic capacity of inulin-type fructans. J Nutr. 2007;137:2503S-2506S.
61.
BuddingtonRKWilliamsCHChenSCWitherlySA. Dietary supplement of neosugar alters the fecal flora and decreases activities of some reductive enzymes in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;63:709-716.
62.
van de WieleTBoonNPossemiersSJacobsHVerstraeteW. Inulin-type fructans of longer degree of polymerization exert more pronounced in vitro prebiotic effects. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:452-460.
63.
HaschkeFFirmansyahAMengMSteenhoutPCarrieA. Functional food for infants and children. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde. 2001;149:S66-S70.
64.
GuigozYRochatFPerruisseau-CarrierGRochatISchiffrinE. Effects of oligosaccharides on the faecal flora and nonspecific immune system in elderly people. Nutr Res. 2002;22:13.
65.
WeltersCFHeinemanEThunnissenFBvan den BogaardAESoetersPBBaetenCG. Effect of dietary inulin supplementation on inflammation of pouch mucosa in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:621-627.
66.
CockramDBHensleyMKRodriguezM. Safety and tolerance of medical nutritional products as sole sources of nutrition in people on hemodialysis. J Ren Nutr. 1998;8:25-33.
67.
GibsonGRBeattyERWangXCummingsJH. Selective stimulation of bifidobacteria in the human colon by oligofructose and inulin. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:975-982.
68.
Castiglia-DelavaudCVerdierEBesleJM. Net energy value of non-starch polysaccharide isolates (sugarbeet fibre and commercial inulin) and their impact on nutrient digestive utilization in healthy human subjects. Br J Nutr. 1998;80:343-352.
69.
GottelandMBrunserO. Effect of an inulin containing yougurt on intestinal function of healthy and constipated volunteers. Revista Chilena de Nutricion. 2006;33:533-560.
70.
van den HeuvelEGMuysTvan DokkumWSchaafsmaG. Oligofructose stimulates calcium absorption in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:544-548.
71.
OhtaASakaiKTakasakiK. The advantages of calcium supplement tablet (candy) containing fructooligosaccharides for the healthy human being. J Nutr Food. 1999;2:37-43.
72.
GriffinIJDavilaPMAbramsSA. Non-digestible oligosaccharides and calcium absorption in girls with adequate calcium intakes. Br J Nutr. 2002;87(suppl 2):S187-S191.
73.
CoudrayCBellangerJCastiglia-DelavaudCRemesyCVermorelMRayssignuierY. Effect of soluble or partly soluble dietary fibres supplementation on absorption and balance of calcium, magnesium, iron and zinc in healthy young men. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51:375-380.
74.
BouhnikYAchourLPaineauDRiottotMAttarABornetF. Four-week short chain fructo-oligosaccharides ingestion leads to increasing fecal bifidobacteria and cholesterol excretion in healthy elderly volunteers. Nutr J. 2007;6:42.
75.
SobotkaLBratovaMSlemrovaMManakJVizd’aJZadakZ. Inulin as the soluble fiber in liquid enteral nutrition. Nutrition. 1997;13:21-25.
76.
ToppingDLFukushimaMBirdAR. Resistant starch as a prebiotic and synbiotic: state of the art. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62:171-176.
77.
PhillipsJMuirJGBirkettA. Effect of resistant starch on fecal bulk and fermentation-dependent events in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;62:121-130.
78.
LesmesUBeardsEJGibsonGRTuohyKMShimoniE. Effects of resistant starch type III polymorphs on human colon microbiota and short chain fatty acids in human gut models. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:5415-5421.
79.
RabenATagliabueAChristensenNJMadsenJHolstJJAstrupA. Resistant starch: the effect on postprandial glycemia, hormonal response, and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60:544-551.
80.
LiljebergHGAkerbergAKBjorckIM. Effect of the glycemic index and content of indigestible carbohydrates of cereal-based breakfast meals on glucose tolerance at lunch in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:647-655.
81.
ParkOJKangNEChangMJKimWK. Resistant starch supplementation influences blood lipid concentrations and glucose control in overweight subjects. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2004;50:93-99.
CummingsJH. The effect of dietary fiber on fecal weight and composition. In: SpillerGA, ed. CRC Handbook of Dietary Fiber in Human Nutrition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1993:263-333.
84.
OkuTHongoRNakamuraS. Suppressive effect of cellulose on osmotic diarrhea caused by maltitol in healthy female subjects. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2008;54:309-314.
85.
ChindaDNakajiSFukudaS. The fermentation of different dietary fibers is associated with fecal clostridia levels in men. J Nutr. 2004;134:1881-1886.
86.
LetermePThewisAvan LeeuwenPMonmartTHuismanJ. Chemical composition of pea fibre isolates and their effect on the endogenous amino acid flow at the ileum of the pig. J Sci Food Agric. 1996;72:127-134.
87.
CherbutCSalvadorVBarryJLDoulayFDelort-LavalJ. Dietary fibre effects on intestinal transit in man: involvement of their physico-chemical properties. Food Hydrocolloids. 1991;5:15-22.
88.
DahlWJWhitingSJHealeyAZelloGAHildebrandtSL. Increased stool frequency occurs when finely processed pea hull fiber is added to usual foods consumed by elderly residents in long-term care. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:1199-1202.
89.
FloganC. Fibre Fortification to Increase Stool Frequency in Children With a History of Constipation [master’s thesis]. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: University of Saskatchewan; 2008.
90.
CassidyABinghamSACummingsJH. Starch intake and colorectal cancer risk: an international comparison. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:937-942.
91.
MurphyMMDouglassJSBirkettA. Resistant starch intakes in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:67-78.
92.
MoshfeghAJFridayJEGoldmanJPAhujaJK. Presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of Americans. J Nutr. 1999;129:1407S-1411S.
93.
PilchSM. Physiological Effects and Health Consequences of Dietary Fiber. Washington, DC: Life Sciences Research Office, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology; 1987. US9001285.
94.
WhelanKJuddPAPreedyVRSimmeringRJannATaylorMA. Fructooligosaccharides and fiber partially prevent the alterations in fecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acid concentrations caused by standard enteral formula in healthy humans. J Nutr. 2005;135:1896-1902.
95.
CummingsJHMacfarlaneGT. The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon. J Appl Bacteriol. 1991;70:443-459.
96.
GhoddusiHBGrandisonMAGrandisonASTuohyKM. In vitro study on gas generation and prebiotic effects of some carbohydrates and their mixtures. Anaerobe. 2007;13:193-199.
97.
HernotDCBoileauTWBauerLL. In vitro fermentation profiles, gas production rates, and microbiota modulation as affected by certain fructans, galactooligosaccharides, and polydextrose. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:1354-1361.
98.
GoetzeOFruehaufHPohlD. Effect of a prebiotic mixture on intestinal comfort and general wellbeing in health. Br J Nutr. 2008;100:1077-1085.
99.
ZhengSSteenhoutPKuiranD. Nutritional support of pediatric cancer patients consuming an enteral formula with fructo-oligosaccharides. Nutr Res. 2006;26:154-162.
100.
ZhengS. Enteral formula with fructo-oligosaccharides in nutritional support of pediatric cancer patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002:430S.
101.
BrunserOGottelandMCruchetSFigueroaGGarridoDSteenhoutP. Effect of a milk formula with prebiotics on the intestinal microbiota of infants after an antibiotic treatment. Pediatr Res. 2006;59:451-456.
102.
BunoutDBarreraGHirschS. Effects of a nutritional supplement on the immune response and cytokine production in free-living Chilean elderly. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004;28:348-354.
103.
BunoutDHirschSPia de la MazaM. Effects of prebiotics on the immune response to vaccination in the elderly. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26:372-376.
104.
HoekstraJHSzajewskaHZikriMA. Oral rehydration solution containing a mixture of non-digestible carbohydrates in the treatment of acute diarrhea: a multicenter randomized placebo controlled study on behalf of the ESPGHAN working group on intestinal infections. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39:239-245.
105.
EvansSDalyADaviesPMacDonaldA. Fibre content of enteral feeds for the older child. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009;22:414-421.
106.
DalyAJohnsonTMacDonaldA. Is fibre supplementation in paediatric sip feeds beneficial?J Hum Nutr Diet. 2004;17:365-370.
107.
GuimberDBourgoisBBeghinL. Effect of multifibre mixture with prebiotic components on bifidobacteria and stool pH in tube-fed children. Br J Nutr. 2010;104:1514-1522.
108.
SilkDBWaltersERDuncanHDGreenCJ. The effect of a polymeric enteral formula supplemented with a mixture of six fibres on normal human bowel function and colonic motility. Clin Nutr. 2001;20:49-58.
109.
SchneiderSMGirard-PipauFAntyR. Effects of total enteral nutrition supplemented with a multi-fibre mix on faecal short-chain fatty acids and microbiota. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:82-90.
110.
KarakanTErgunMDoganICindorukMUnalS. Comparison of early enteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis with prebiotic fiber supplementation versus standard enteral solution: a prospective randomized double-blind study. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2733-2737.
111.
SchultzAAAshby-HughesBTaylorRGillisDEWilkinsM. Effects of pectin on diarrhea in critically ill tube-fed patients receiving antibiotics. Am J Crit Care. 2000;9:403-411.
112.
Van AerdeJAlarconPLamW. Tolerance and safety of energy-dense enteral formulae for young children. Int Pediatr. 2003;18:95-99.
113.
WierdsmaNJvan BodegravenAAUitdehaagBM. Fructo-oligosaccharides and fibre in enteral nutrition has a beneficial influence on microbiota and gastrointestinal quality of life. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:804-812.
114.
KhoshooVSunSSStormH. Tolerance of an enteral formula with insoluble and prebiotic fiber in children with compromised gastrointestinal function. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1728-1733.
115.
ChittawatanaratKPokawinpudisnunPPolbhakdeeY. Mixed fibers diet in surgical ICU septic patients. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2010;19:458-464.
116.
VandewoudeMFParidaensKMSuyRABooneMAStrobbeH. Fibre-supplemented tube feeding in the hospitalised elderly. Age Ageing. 2005;34:120-124.
117.
ZarlingEJEdisonTBergerSLeyaJDeMeoM. Effect of dietary oat and soy fiber on bowel function and clinical tolerance in a tube feeding dependent population. J Am Coll Nutr. 1994;13:565-568.
118.
HalmosEPMuirJGBarrettJSDengMShepherdSJGibsonPR. Diarrhoea during enteral nutrition is predicted by the poorly absorbed short-chain carbohydrate (FODMAP) content of the formula. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:925-933.
