Assessment of body composition, both at single time points and longitudinally, is particularly important in clinical nutrition practice. It provides a means for the clinician to characterize nutrition status at a single time point, aiding in the identification and diagnosis of malnutrition, and to monitor changes over time by providing real-time information on the adequacy of nutrition interventions. Objective body composition measurement tools are available clinically but are often underused in nutrition care, particularly in the United States. This is, in part, due to a number of factors concerning their use in a clinical context: cost and accessibility of equipment, as well as interpretability of the results. This article focuses on the factors influencing interpretation of results in a clinical setting. Body composition assessment, regardless of the method, is inherently limited by its indirect nature. Therefore, an understanding of the strengths and limitations of any method is essential for meaningful interpretation of its results. This review provides an overview of body composition technologies available clinically (computed tomography, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioimpedance, ultrasound) and discusses the strengths and limitations of each device.
WhiteJVGuenterPJensenGConsensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(5):730-738.
2.
MaloneAHamiltonC.The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition consensus malnutrition characteristics: application in practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013;28(6):639-650.
3.
CederholmTBosaeusIBarazzoniRDiagnostic criteria for malnutrition—an ESPEN consensus statement. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(3):335-340.
4.
PourhassanMSchautzBBraunWImpact of body-composition methodology on the composition of weight loss and weight gain. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(5):446-454.
5.
LaForgiaJDollmanJDaleMJValidation of DXA body composition estimates in obese men and women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(4):821-826.
6.
EllisKJ.Human body composition: in vivo methods. Physiol Rev. 2000;80(2):649-680.
7.
EarthmanCP.Body composition tools for assessment of adult malnutrition at the bedside: a tutorial on research considerations and clinical applications. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015;39(7):787-822.
8.
PradoCMMHeymsfieldSB.Lean tissue imaging: a new era for nutritional assessment and intervention. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014;38:940-953.
9.
HeymsfieldSBNoelRLynnMAccuracy of soft tissue density predicted by CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979;3(6):859-860.
10.
KumarAMoynaghMRMultinuFMuscle composition measured by CT scan is a measurable predictor of overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;142(2):311-316.
11.
SjøblomBGrønbergBHWentzel-LarsenTSkeletal muscle radiodensity is prognostic for survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer [published online April1, 2016]. Clin Nutr.
12.
MartinLBirdsellLMacDonaldNCancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(12):1539-1547.
13.
HuangDDWangSLZhuangCLSarcopenia, as defined by low muscle mass, strength and physical performance, predicts complications after surgery for colorectal cancer. Color Dis. 2015;17(11): O256-O264.
14.
LieffersJRBatheOFFassbenderKSarcopenia is associated with postoperative infection and delayed recovery from colorectal cancer resection surgery. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(6):931-936.
15.
BaracosVEReimanTMourtzakisMBody composition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a contemporary view of cancer cachexia with the use of computed tomography image analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:1133-1137.
16.
CamusVLanicHKrautJPrognostic impact of fat tissue loss and cachexia assessed by computed tomography scan in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy. Eur J Haematol. 2014;93(1):9-18.
17.
PradoCMLieffersJRMcCargarLJPrevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):629-635.
18.
GakharHDhillonABlackwellJStudy investigating the role of skeletal muscle mass estimation in metastatic spinal cord compression. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(10):2150-2155.
19.
WeijsPJMLooijaardWGPMDekkerIMLow skeletal muscle area is a risk factor for mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2014;18(1):R12.
20.
DocimoSLamparelloBCohenMFUtilizing quantitative measures of visceral adiposity in evaluating trauma patient outcomes. Int J Surg. 2015;21(2015):51-56.
21.
BrewsterDJStraussBJGCrozierTM.Measuring visceral fat, subcutaneous fat and skeletal muscle area changes by computed tomography in acute pancreatitis: a retrospective, single-centre study. Crit Care Resusc. 2014;16(1):42-47.
22.
WangCWFengSCovinskyKEA comparison of muscle function, mass, and quality in liver transplant candidates. Transplantation. 2016;100(8):1692-1698.
23.
Montano-LozaAJMeza-JuncoJPradoCMMMuscle wasting is associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(2):166-173.
24.
GoldmanLW.Principles of CT and CT technology. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35(3):115-128.
25.
Gomez-PerezSLHausJMSheeanPMeasuring abdominal circumference and skeletal muscle from a single cross-sectional computed tomography image: a step-by-step guide for clinicians using national institutes of health ImageJ. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(3):308-318.
26.
IrvingBAWeltmanJYBrockDWNIH ImageJ and Slice-O-Matic computed tomography imaging software to quantify soft tissue. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(2):370-376.
27.
GoodpasterBHThaeteFLKelleyDE.Composition of skeletal muscle evaluated with computed tomography. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;904:18-24.
28.
MazonakisMDamilakisJ.Computed tomography: what and how does it measure?Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(8):1499-1504.
29.
KimWHKimCGKimDW.Optimal CT number range for adipose tissue when determining lean body mass in whole-body F-18 FDG PET/CT studies. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;46(4):294-299.
30.
ShenWPunyanityaMWangZTotal body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97:2333-2338.
31.
MourtzakisMPradoCMMLieffersJRA practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33:997-1006.
32.
PengPHyderOFiroozmandAImpact of sarcopenia on outcomes following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(8):1478-1486.
33.
VeldJVossenJADe Amorim BernsteinKAdipose tissue and muscle attenuation as novel biomarkers predicting mortality in patients with extremity sarcomas [published online March9, 2016]. Eur Radiol.
34.
AkahoriTShoMKinoshitaSPrognostic significance of muscle attenuation in pancreatic cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. World J Surg. 2015;39(12):2975-2982.
35.
VoronTTselikasLPietraszDSarcopenia impacts on short- and long-term results of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1173-1183.
36.
AubreyJEsfandiariNBaracosVEMeasurement of skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and basis of its biological variation. Acta Physiol. 2014;210(3):489-497.
37.
AntounSLanoyEIacovelliRSkeletal muscle density predicts prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapies. Cancer. 2013;119(18):3377-3384.
38.
MategranoVCPetasnickJClarkJAttenuation values in computed tomography of the abdomen. Radiology. 1977;125(1):135-140.
39.
McCulloughECMorinRL.CT-number variability in thoracic geometry. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141(1):135-140.
40.
HunterTPondGMedinaO.Dependence of substance CT number on scanning technique and position within scanner. Comput Radiol. 1983;7(3):199-203.
41.
LeviCGrayJEMcCulloughECThe unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139(3):443-447.
42.
GroellRRienmuellerRSchafflerGJCT number variations due to different image acquisition and reconstruction parameters: a thorax phantom study. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2000;24(2):53-58.
43.
BirnbaumB aHindmanNLeeJMulti-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology. 2007;242(1):109-119.
44.
PaulJKraussBBanckwitzRRelationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(5):e699-e703.
45.
BryantJADrageNARichmondS.CT number definition. Radiat Phys Chem. 2012;81(4):358-361.
46.
KellyTLSlovikDMNeerRM.Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometers. J Bone Miner Res. 1989;4(5):663-669.
47.
YangHRChangEJ.Insulin resistance, body composition, and fat distribution in obese children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2016;25(1):126-133.
48.
PelletierCAMiyataniMGiangregorioLSarcopenic obesity in adults with chronic spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study [published online June7, 2016]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
49.
OrgelEMueskeNMSpostoRLimitations of body mass index to assess body composition due to sarcopenic obesity during leukemia therapy [published online January27, 2016]. Leuk Lymphoma.
50.
BarbourLAHernandezTLReynoldsRMStriking differences in infant adiposity by new and old DXA software, PEA POD, and skinfolds at 2 weeks and 1 year of life. Diabetes. 2015;64:A38-A39.
51.
El GhochMPourhassanMMilaneseCChanges in lean and skeletal muscle body mass in adult females with anorexia nervosa before and after weight restoration [published online October28, 2015]. Clin Nutr.
52.
VerneyJMetzLChaplaisEBioelectrical impedance is an accurate method to assess body composition in obese but not severely obese adolescents. Nutr Res. 2016;36(7):663-670.
53.
CharatsiAMDusserPFreundRBioelectrical impedance in young patients with cystic fibrosis: validation of a specific equation and clinical relevance [published online June8, 2016]. J Cyst Fibros.
54.
BaranauskasMNJohnsonKEJuvancic-HeltzelJASeven-site versus three-site method of body composition using BodyMetrix ultrasound compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [published online October22, 2015]. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging.
55.
BeckmanLMBoullataJIFisherPLEvaluation of lean body weight equation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures [published online July28, 2015]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
56.
PietrobelliAFormicaCWangZDual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(6, pt 1):E941-E951.
57.
BazzocchiAPontiFAlbisinniUDXA: technical aspects and application. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(8):1481-1492.
58.
NorcrossJVan LoanMD.Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(4):472-476.
59.
KellyTLWilsonKEHeymsfieldSB.Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition reference values from NHANES. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):2-9.
60.
CoinAGianniniSMinicuciNLimb fat-free mass and fat mass reference values by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a 20-80 year-old Italian population. Clin Nutr. 2012;31(4):506-511.
61.
GuglielmiGPontiFAgostiniMThe role of DXA in sarcopenia [published online June2, 2016]. Aging Clin Exp Res.
62.
BaumgartnerRNKoehlerKMGallagherDEpidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(8):755-763.
63.
SantilliVBernettiAMangoneMClinical definition of sarcopenia. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014;11(3):177-180.
64.
KerrASlaterGJByrneNReliability of two different positioning protocols for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of body composition in healthy adults. J Clin Densitom. 2016;19(3):282-289.
65.
Van LoanMDKeimNLBergKEvaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27(4):587-591.
66.
TothillPAvenellALoveJComparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994;48(11):781-794.
67.
SorianoJ-MPIoannidouEWangJPencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7(3):281-289.
68.
HorberFFThomiFCasezJPImpact of hydration status on body composition as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal volunteers and patients on haemodialysis. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:895-900.
69.
NanaASlaterGJHopkinsWGEffects of daily activities on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition in active people. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1):180-189.
70.
KellyTLBergerNRichardsonTL.DXA body composition: theory and practice. Appl Radiat Isot. 1998;49(5-6):511-513.
71.
MuscaritoliMAnkerSDArgilésJConsensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: Joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) “cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases” and “nutrition in geriatrics.”Clin Nutr. 2010;29(2):154-159.
72.
RothneyMPBrychtaRJSchaeferEVBody composition measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry half-body scans in obese adults. Obesity. 2009;17(6):1281-1286.
MatthieJR.Bioimpedance measurements of human body composition: critical analysis and outlook. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(2):239-261.
75.
KyleUGBosaeusIDe LorenzoADBioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1226-1243.
76.
JaffrinMYMorelH.Body fluid volumes measurements by impedance: a review of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) methods. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30(10):1257-1269.
77.
MulasiUKuchniaAJColeAJBioimpedance at the bedside: current applications, limitations, and opportunities. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30(2):180-193.
78.
LukaskiHC.Evolution of bioimpedance: a circuitous journey from estimation of physiological function to assessment of body composition and a return to clinical research. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(suppl 1):S2-S9.
79.
EarthmanCTraughberDDobratzJBioimpedance spectroscopy for clinical assessment of fluid distribution and body cell mass. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22(4):389-405.
80.
ColeKSColeRH.Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics. J Chem Phys. 1941;9(4):341.
81.
MarcelliDUsvyatLAKotankoPBody composition and survival in dialysis patients: results from an international cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(7):1192-1200.
82.
Barbosa-SilvaMCGBarrosAJDWangJBioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values for phase angle by age and sex. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(1):49-52.
83.
DittmarM.Reliability and variability of bioimpedance measures in normal adults: effects of age, gender, and body mass. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003;122(4):361-370.
84.
Bosy-WestphalADanielzikSDorhoferR-PPhase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(4):309-316.
85.
KyleUGGentonLSlosmanDOFat-free and fat mass percentiles in 5225 healthy subjects aged 15 to 98 years. Nutrition. 2001;17(7-8):534-541.
86.
BahatGTufanATufanFCut-off points to identify sarcopenia according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition [published online February11, 2016]. Clin Nutr.
87.
SchutzYKyleUUGPichardC.Fat-free mass index and fat mass index percentiles in Caucasians aged 18-98 y. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26(7):953-960.
88.
El-KatebSDavenportA.Changes in intracellular water following hemodialysis treatment lead to changes in estimates of lean tissue using bioimpedance spectroscopy. Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31(3):375-377.
89.
OnofriescuMHogasSVoroneanuLBioimpedance-guided fluid management in maintenance hemodialysis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(1):111-118.
90.
O’loneELVisserAFinneyHClinical significance of multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy in peritoneal dialysis patients: independent predictor of patient survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(7):1430-1437.
91.
DewitteACarlesPJoannès-BoyauOBioelectrical impedance spectroscopy to estimate fluid balance in critically ill patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(2):227-233.
92.
ErnstbrunnerMKostnerLKimbergerOBioimpedance spectroscopy for assessment of volume status in patients before and after general anaesthesia. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e111139.
93.
El-KatebSDavenportA.Changes in hydration following haemodialysis estimated with bioimpedance spectroscopy. Nephrology. 2016;21(5):410-415.
94.
Barbosa-SilvaMCGBarrosAJD.Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: a new perspective on its use beyond body composition equations. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8(3):311-317.
95.
VisserMvan VenrooijLMWWandersDCMThe bioelectrical impedance phase angle as an indicator of undernutrition and adverse clinical outcome in cardiac surgical patients. Clin Nutr. 2012;31(6):981-986.
96.
CardinalTRWazlawikEBastosJLStandardized phase angle indicates nutritional status in hospitalized preoperative patients. Nutr Res. 2010;30(9):594-600.
97.
GuptaDLisCGDahlkSLThe relationship between bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in advanced colorectal cancer. Nutr J. 2008;7(1):7-19.
98.
Bosy-WestphalADanielzikSDörhöferR-PPhase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015;30(4):309-316.
99.
PiccoliAPillonLDumlerF.Impedance vector distribution by sex, race, body mass index, and age in the United States: standard reference intervals as bivariate Z scores. Nutrition. 2002;18(2):153-167.
100.
KuchniaAJTeigenLMColeAJPhase angle and impedance ratio: reference cut-points from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004 from bioimpedance spectroscopy data [published online September 26, 2016]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
101.
KimKWagnerWR.Non-invasive and non-destructive characterization of tissue engineered constructs using ultrasound imaging technologies: a review. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;44(3):621-635.
ParisMMourtzakisMDayAVALIDation of bedside Ultrasound of Muscle layer thickness of the quadriceps in the critically ill patient (VALIDUM study): a prospective multicenter study [published online March9, 2016]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
105.
ParrySMEl-AnsaryDCartwrightMSUltrasonography in the intensive care setting can be used to detect changes in the quality and quantity of muscle and is related to muscle strength and function. J Crit Care. 2015;30(5):1151.e9-1151.e14.
106.
PuthuchearyZAPhadkeRRawalJQualitative ultrasound in acute critical illness muscle wasting. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(8):1603-1611.
107.
AbeTDabbsNCNaharVKRelationship between dual-relationship between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived appendicular lean tissue mass and total body skeletal muscle mass estimated by ultrasound. Int J Clin Med. 2013;4:283-286.
108.
ArbeillePKerbeciPCapriAQuantification of muscle volume by echography: comparison with MRI data on subjects in long-term bed rest. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35(7):1092-1097.
109.
AbeTKondoMKawakamiYPrediction equations for body composition of Japanese adults by B-mode ultrasound. Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6(2):161-170.
110.
TakaiYOhtaMAkagiRApplicability of ultrasound muscle thickness measurements for predicting fat-free mass in elderly population. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2014;18(6):579-585.
111.
ConnollyBMacBeanVCrowleyCUltrasound for the assessment of peripheral skeletal muscle architecture in critical illness: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2015;(43):897-905.
112.
ParisMMourtzakisM.Assessment of skeletal muscle mass in critically ill patients: considerations for the utility of computed tomography imaging and ultrasonography. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2016;19(2):125-130.
113.
TillquistMKutsogiannisDJWischmeyerPEBedside ultrasound is a practical and reliable measurement tool for assessing quadriceps muscle layer thickness. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;38(7):886-890.
114.
Harris-LoveMOMonfarediRIsmailCQuantitative ultrasound: measurement considerations for the assessment of muscular dystrophy and sarcopenia. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:172.
115.
IshidaHWatanabeS.Influence of inward pressure of the transducer on lateral abdominal muscle thickness during ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(9):815-818.
116.
CampbellITWattTWithersDMuscle thickness, measured with ultrasound, may be an indicator of lean tissue wasting in multiple organ failure in the presence of edema. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;62(3):533-539.
117.
Harris-LoveMOSeamonBATeixeiraCUltrasound estimates of muscle quality in older adults: reliability and comparison of Photoshop and ImageJ for the grayscale analysis of muscle echogenicity. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1721.
118.
Cardenas-GarciaJMayoPH.Bedside ultrasonography for the intensivist. Crit Care Clin. 2015;31(1):43-66.
119.
ReimersCDFleckensteinJLWittTNMuscular ultrasound in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies of adults. J Neurol Sci. 1993;116(1):82-92.
120.
ReimersKReimersCDWagnerSSkeletal muscle sonography: a correlative study of echogenicity and morphology. J Ultrasound Med. 1993;12:73-77.
121.
SarwalAParrySMBerryMJInterobserver reliability of quantitative muscle sonographic analysis in the critically ill population. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(7):1191-200.
122.
EarthmanCPWolfeRRHeymsfieldSB.Dudrick Research Symposium 2015—lean tissue and protein in health and disease: key targets and assessment strategies [published online December18, 2015]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
123.
JanssenIHeymsfieldSBRossR.Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(5):889-896.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
