Sedation monitoring is essential in pediatric patients on ventilatory support to achieve comfort and safety. The COMFORT scale was designed and validated to assess the level of sedation in intubated pediatric patients. However, it remains unreliable in pharmacologically paralyzed patients. The SNAP II index is calculated using an algorithm that incorporates high-frequency (80-420 Hz) electroencephalogram (EEG) components, known to be useful in discriminating between awake and unconscious states, unlike other measurements that only include low-frequency EEG segments such as the bispectral index score. Previous studies suggested that the SNAP II index is a reliable and sensitive indicator of the level of consciousness in adult patients. Despite its potential, no data are currently available in the pediatric critically ill population on ventilatory support. This is the first pilot study assessing the potential application of the SNAP II index in critically ill pediatric patients by comparing it to the commonly used COMFORT scale.
GordinPC. Assessing and managing agitation in a critically ill infant. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1990;15(1):26–32.
2.
MarxCMRosenbergDIAmbuelBHamlettKWBlumerJL. Pediatric intensive care sedation: survey of fellowship training programs. Pediatrics. 1993;91(2):369–378.
3.
ChevronVMenardJFRichardJCGiraultCLeroyJBonmarchandG. Unplanned extubation: risk factors of development and predictive criteria for reintubation. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(6):1049–1053.
4.
FonsmarkLRasmussenYHCarlP. Occurrence of withdrawal in critically ill sedated children. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(1):196–199.
5.
AmbuelBHamlettKWMarxCMBlumerJL. Assessing distress in pediatric intensive care environments: the Comfort scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992;17(1):95–109.
6.
TwiteMDRashidAZukJFriesenRH. Sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade in the pediatric intensive care unit: survey of fellowship training programs. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5(6):521–532.
7.
van DijkMde BoerJBKootHMTibboelDPasschierJDuivenvoordenHJ. The reliability and validity of the Comfort scale as a postoperative pain instrument in 0 to 3-year-old infants. Pain. 2000;84(2-3):367–377.
8.
AnejaRHeardAMFletcherJEHeardCM. Sedation monitoring of children by the Bispectral Index in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003;4(1):60–64.
9.
MarxCMSmithPGLowrieLH. Optimal sedation of mechanically ventilated pediatric critical care patients. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(1):163–170.
10.
BearLAWard-SmithP. Interrater reliability of the Comfort Scale. Pediatr Nurs. 2006;32(5):427–434.
11.
WongCAFragenRJFitzgeraldPCMcCarthyRJ. The association between propofol-induced loss of consciousness and the SNAP index. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(1):141–148.
12.
SchmidtGNBischoffPStandlT. SNAP index and Bispectral index during different states of propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(3):228–234.
13.
HirotaKKubotaTIshiharaHMatsukiA. The effects of nitrous oxide and ketamine on the bispectral index and 95% spectral edge frequency during propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999;16(11):779–783.
14.
VereeckeHEStruysMMMortierEP. A comparison of bispectral index and ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index in measuring the clinical interaction between ketamine and propofol anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(10):957–961.
15.
UtleyMGallivanSDixeyJYoungA. Correlation analysis versus Bland-Altman analysis: comment on the article by Genant et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(7):1557–1559.
16.
BlandJMAltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310.
17.
BlandJMAltmanDG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995;346(8982):1085–1087.
18.
KrouwerJS. Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method. Stat Med. 2008;27(5):778–780.
19.
DewitteKFierensCStocklDThienpontLM.Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. Clin Chem. 2002;48(5):799–801; author reply 801-792.
20.
ManthaSRoizenMFFleisherLAThistedRFossJ. Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for Bland and Altman analysis. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(3):593–602.
21.
MylesPSCuiJ. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(3):309–311.
BischoffPSchmidtG.Monitoring methods: SNAP. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20(1):141–146.
24.
BruhnJBouillonTWShaferSL. Electromyographic activity falsely elevates the bispectral index. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(5):1485–1487.
25.
MessnerMBeeseURomstockJDinkelMTschaikowskyK.The bispectral index declines during neuromuscular block in fully awake persons. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(2):488–491,
26.
DresslerOSchneiderGStockmannsGKochsEF. Awareness and the EEG power spectrum: analysis of frequencies. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(6):806–809.
27.
WongCAFragenRJFitzgeraldPMcCarthyRJ. A comparison of the SNAP II and BIS XP indices during sevoflurane and nitrous oxide anaesthesia at 1 and 1.5 MAC and at awakening. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(2):181–186.
