The Interhospital Medical Intensive Care Unit Transfer Instrument Facilitates Early Implementation of Critical Therapies and Is Associated With Fewer Emergent Procedures Upon Arrival

Abstract

Background:

Interhospital transportation of critically ill patients is challenging. The risk incurred by the patient is compounded when stabilization and application of appropriate therapies are delayed. The purpose of this study was to first develop an interhospital intensive care unit (ICU) transfer instrument to systematize communication and determine feasibility of use. Then, the transfer instrument was tested for effects on patient mortality, stability on arrival, and recommended therapy implementation.

Method:

The instrument was developed and pilot tested for 6 months to optimize function and applicability. Then, a before-and-after quasi-experimental study tested this instrument by assessing several key outcomes. Outcomes measured included 48-hour mortality, ICU mortality, hospital mortality, emergent intubation, emergent central venous catheter insertion, immediate change in antibiotics, and addition of vasopressors immediately on arrival. Patients were compared by age, gender, cause for admission, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. A standardized mortality ratio was calculated using the patient’s APACHE II score. Pretransport recommendations to referring physicians and adherence to recommendations were also measured.

Results:

The preintervention group consisted of 134 patients collected continuously over 6 months. The postintervention group was collected continuously over a 6-month period and included 77 patients. The interhospital ICU transfer instrument was associated with fewer emergent central venous catheter insertions and fewer changes in antibiotics on arrival. Recommendations to transferring physicians were followed 90% of the time.

Conclusions:

The interhospital ICU transfer instrument is a tool that is effective in coordinating the transfer of medical ICU patients. Implementation leads to timely critical interventions and may reduce mortality.

Keywords

intensive care unit outcomes epidemiology interhospital transfer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ligtenberg

JJM

Arnold

Stienstra

. Quality of interhospital transport of critically ill patients: a prospective audit. Crit Care. 2005;9(4):R446–R451.

Fink

Suter

. The future of our specialty: critical care medicine a decade from now. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1811–1816.

Koppenberg

Taeger

. Interhospital transport: transport of critically ill patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15(2):211–215.

Hill

Vingilis

Martin

Hartford

Speechley

. Interhospital transfer of critically ill patients: demographic and outcomes comparison with nontransferred intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2007;22(4):290–295.

Gerber

Schorr

Ahmed

Dellinger

Parrillo

. Location of patients before transfer to a tertiary care intensive care unit: impact on outcome. J Crit Care. 2009;24(1):108–113.

Rosenberg

Hofer

Strachan

Watts

Hayward

. Accepting critically ill transfer patients: adverse effect on a referral center ’s outcome and benchmark measures. J Intern Med. 2003;138(11):882–891.

Duke

. Outcome of critically ill patients undergoing interhospital transfer. Med J Aust. 2001;174(3):122–125.

Durairaj

Will

Torner

Doebbeling

. Prognostic factors for mortality following interhospital transfers to the medical intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(7):1981–1986.

Mortality Risk Adjustment Methodology. United Health Consortium. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/mortality/Meurer.htm. Accessed February 25, 2012.

10.

Blumen

Thomas

Williams

. Transportation of the critically ill patient. In: Hall

Schmidt

Wood

eds. Principles of Critical Care. 3rd edition. New York, New York: McGraw Hill; 2005:79–91.

11.

Nirula

Maier

Moore

Sperry

Gentilello

. Scoop and run to the trauma center or stay and play at the local hospital: hospital transfer’s effect on mortality. J Trauma. 2010;69(3):595–599.

12.

Smith

Conn

AKT

. Prehospital care - scoop and run or stay and play? Injury. 2009;40(suppl 4):S23–S26.

13.

Wallace

Ridley

. ABC of intensive care: transport of critically ill patients committee. BMJ. 1999;319(7206):368–371.

14.

Warren

Fromm

Orr

R a

Rotello

Horst

. Guidelines for the inter- and intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(1):256–262.

15.

Belway

Dodek

Keenan

Norena

Wong

. The role of transport intervals in outcomes for critically ill patients who are transferred to referral centers. J Crit Care. 2008;23(3):287–294.

16.

Emergency Medicine Practice Committee. Appropriate interhospital patient transfer. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30(3):365.

17.

Joint Commission 2012 National Patient Safety Goals. www.jointcommission.org/bhc_2012_npsgs/. Accessed May 1, 2012.

18.

Rivers

Nguyen

Haystad

. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–1377.

19.

Kumar

Roberts

Wood

. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1589–1596.

20.

Dellinger

Levy

Rhodes

. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):165–228.