Health care providers nationwide are routinely trained in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), an American Heart Association program that teaches cardiac arrest management. Recent changes in the ACLS approach have de-emphasized routine pulse checks in an effort to promote uninterrupted chest compressions. We hypothesized that this new ACLS algorithm may lead to uncertainty regarding the appropriate action following detection of a pulse during a cardiac arrest.
Methods:
We conducted an observational study in which a Web-based survey was sent to ACLS-trained medical providers at 4 major urban tertiary care centers in the United States. The survey consisted of 5 multiple-choice, scenario-based ACLS questions, including our question of interest. Adult staff members with a valid ACLS certification were included.
Results:
A total of 347 surveys were analyzed. The response rate was 28.1%. The majority (53.6%) of responders were between 18 and 32 years old, and 59.9% were female. The majority (54.2%) of responders incorrectly stated that they would continue CPR and possibly administer additional therapies when a team member detects a pulse immediately following defibrillation. Secondarily, only 51.9% of respondents correctly chose to perform a rhythm check following 2 minutes of CPR. The other 3 survey questions were correctly answered an average of 89.1% of the time.
Conclusion:
Confusion exists regarding whether or not CPR and cardiac medications should be continued in the presence of a pulse. Education may be warranted to emphasize avoiding compressions and medications when a palpable pulse is detected.
EisenbergMSMengertTJ. Cardiac resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(17):1304–1313.
2.
EdelsonDPAbellaBSKramer-JohansenJ. Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2006;71(2):137–145.
3.
AbellaBSSandboNVassilatosP. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2005;111(4):428–434.
4.
NeumarRWOttoCWLinkMS. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 suppl 3):S729–S767.
5.
ReaTDCookAJStiellIG. Predicting survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: role of the Utstein data elements. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(3):249–257.
6.
SassonCRogersMADahlJKellermannAL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(1):63–81.
7.
AgarwalDAHessEPAtkinsonEJWhiteRD. Ventricular fibrillation in Rochester, Minnesota: experience over 18 years. Resuscitation. 2009;80(11):1253–1258.
8.
EftestolTWikLSundeKSteenPA. Effects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on predictors of ventricular fibrillation defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2004;110(1):10–15.
9.
EftestolTSundeKSteenPA. Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2002;105(19):2270–2273.
10.
WongMLCareySMaderTJWangHE. Time to invasive airway placement and resuscitation outcomes after inhospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation. 2010;81(2):182–186.
11.
JenningsPACameronPWalkerTBernardSSmithK. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Victoria: rural and urban outcomes. Med J Aust. 2006;185(3):135–139.
12.
KudenchukPJCobbLACopassMK. Amiodarone for resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(12):871–878.
13.
VandyckeCMartensP. High dose versus standard dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest—a meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2000;45(3):161–166.
14.
DorianPCassDSchwartzBCooperRGelaznikasRBarrA. Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):884–890.
15.
StiellIGWellsGAFieldB. Advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(7):647–656.
16.
OlasveengenTMSundeKBrunborgCThowsenJSteenPAWikL. Intravenous drug administration during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302(20):2222–2229.
17.
EberleBDickWFSchneiderTWisserGDoetschSTzanovaI. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse. Resuscitation. 1996;33(2):107–116.
18.
MouleP. Checking the carotid pulse: diagnostic accuracy in students of the healthcare professions. Resuscitation. 2000;44(3):195–201.
19.
BhendeMSThompsonAE. Evaluation of an end-tidal CO2 detector during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pediatrics. 1995;95(3):395–399.
20.
CallahamMBartonC. Prediction of outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation from end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration. Crit Care Med. 1990;18(4):358–362.
21.
ParadisNAMartinGBRiversEP. Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA. 1990;263(8):1106–1113.
22.
RiversEPMartinGBSmithlineH. The clinical implications of continuous central venous oxygen saturation during human CPR. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(9):1094–1101.
23.
CantineauJPLambertYMerckxP. End-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans presenting mostly with asystole: a predictor of outcome. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(5):791–796.
24.
GrmecSKupnikD. Does the Mainz Emergency Evaluation Scoring (MEES) in combination with capnometry (MEESc) help in the prognosis of outcome from cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a prehospital setting?Resuscitation. 2003;58(1):89–96.
25.
GrmecSKlemenP. Does the end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) concentration have prognostic value during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?Eur J Emerg Med. 2001;8(4):263–269.
26.
KolarMKrizmaricMKlemenPGrmecS. Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide successful predicts cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2008;12(5):R115.
27.
SteedmanDJRobertsonCE. Measurement of end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Arch Emerg Med. 1990;7(3):129–134.
28.
PokornaMNecasEKratochvilJSkripskyRAndrlikMFranekO. A sudden increase in partial pressure end-tidal carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO(2)) at the moment of return of spontaneous circulation. J Emerg Med. 2010;38(5):614–621.
29.
SehraRUnderwoodKChecchiaP. End tidal CO2 is a quantitative measure of cardiac arrest. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26(1 pt 2):515–517.
30.
GrmecSKrizmaricMMallySKozeljASpindlerMLesnikB. Utstein style analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—bystander CPR and end expired carbon dioxide. Resuscitation. 2007;72(3):404–414.
31.
EntholznerEFelberAMielkeLHargasserSBreinbauerBHundelshausenVBHippR. The determination of end-expiratory CO2 during resuscitation. Experience and results with the Normocap 200 (Fa. Datex) in preclinical resuscitation conditions. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1992;27(8):473–476.
32.
GarnettAROrnatoJPGonzalezERJohnsonEB. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA. 1987;257(4):512–515.
33.
BhendeMSKarasicDGKarasicRB. End-tidal carbon dioxide changes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation after experimental asphyxial cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14(4):349–350.
34.
FalkJLRackowECWeilMH. End-tidal carbon dioxide concentration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(10):607–611.
35.
OrnatoJPShipleyJBRachtEM. Multicenter study of a portable, hand-size, colorimetric end-tidal carbon dioxide detection device. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(5):518–523.
36.
MaronBJEstesNAIII. Medical progress: commotio cordis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(10):917–927.
37.
KohlPSachsFFranzM. Cardiac Mechano-Electric Feedback and Arrhythmias: From Pipette to Patient. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2005.
38.
CapucciAAschieriDPelizzoniVCavannaARosiAFerraroS. Chest compression after defibrillation may reinduce ventricular fibrillation as in commotion cordis cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2009;120:S1457.
