A 24-Hour Postintensive Care Unit Transition-of-Care Model Shortens Hospital Stay

Abstract

Background:

Patients discharged early from the medical intensive care unit (MICU) are at risk of deterioration, MICU readmission, and increased mortality. An earlier discharge to a medical ward is desirable to reduce costs but it may adversely affect outcomes. To address this problem, a new model for the MICU transition of care was implemented at our academic center: The MICU team continued to manage all patients transferred from the MICU to the medical ward for at least 24 hours.

Methods:

Data were collected for all MICU patients admitted 1 year before and 1 year after the intervention. Hospital length of stay (LOS) after transfer from the MICU, readmission rate, and mortality rate were compared before and after the intervention. A nonparsimonious propensity model based on 30 factors was used to identify matched preintervention and postintervention cohorts.

Results:

A total of 618 of the 848 patients admitted to the MICU were transferred to medical ward during the year prior to the implementation of the new model, and 600 of the 883 patients were transferred during the following year. Pre- and postintervention cohorts were well matched (n = 483 patients in each group). Poisson regression analysis showed a decrease in the hospital LOS after MICU transfer by 1.17 days (P < .001) without a significant change in adjusted mortality (lower by 1.9%, P = .181) and MICU readmission rates (lower by 2%, P = .264).

Conclusion:

A new model for the post-MICU transition of care, with the MICU team continuing to manage all patients transferred to the medical ward for at least 24 hours, significantly decreased duration of hospital stay after MICU transfer without affecting MICU readmission and mortality rate. The implementation of this model may lower medical costs and make transition of care safer without adverse outcomes.

Keywords

medical intensive care unit stay readmission mortality hospital stay posttransition of care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jacobs

Noseworthy

. National estimates of intensive care utilization and costs: Canada and the United States. Crit Care Med. 1990;18(11):1282–1286.

Jones

Griffiths

. Identifying post intensive care patients who may need physical rehabilitation. Clin Intern Care. 2000;11(1):35–38.

Campbell

Cook

Adey

Cuthbertson

. Predicting death and readmission after intensive care discharge. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(5):656–662.

Zimmerman

. Intensive care unit readmission: the issue is safety not frequency. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(3):984–985.

Rosenberg

Watts

: Patients readmitted to ICUs: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Chest. 2000;118(2):492–502.

Rosenberg

Hofer

Hayward

Strachan

Watts

. Who bounces back? Physiologic and other predictors of intensive care unit readmission. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(3):511–518.

Kramer

Higgins

Zimmerman

. Intensive care unit readmissions in U.S. hospitals: patient characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(1):3–10.

Priestap

Martin

. Impact of intensive care unit discharge time on patient outcome. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(12):2946–2951.

Brasel

. Can we safely discharge patients from the intensive care unit after hours? Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):2443–2444.

10.

Brown

Ratcliffe

Kahn

Halpern

: The epidemiology of intensive care unit readmissions in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(9):955–964.