Anesthesiologist and Emergency Medicine Physician Attitudes and Knowledge Regarding Etomidate for Intubation

Abstract

Purpose:

The use of etomidate as an induction agent for critically ill patients is controversial. While its favorable hemodynamic profile is enviable, etomidate has been shown to cause transient adrenal suppression. The clinical consequences of transient adrenal suppression are poorly understood. Anecdotally, some clinicians advocate strongly for etomidate, while others feel it can cause significant harm. To better understand the current clinical environment with respect to single-dose etomidate use in critically ill patients, Canadian anesthesiologists and Canadian emergency medicine (EM) physicians were questioned regarding their opinions, knowledge, and preferences about etomidate use as an induction agent.

Methods:

Invitations to participate with the electronic survey were sent to 100 Canadian EM physicians and 260 Canadian anesthesiologists. The survey had 4 general parts: demographics, familiarity with the current literature, choice of induction agent given various clinical scenarios, and opinions on the controversy. The Pearson γ² test was used to detect whether significant differences exist between physician groups.

Results:

Ninety three anesthesiologists and 42 EM physicians responded for response rates of 36% and 42%. There were no self-reported differences in knowledge about etomidate properties between EM physicians and anesthesiologists. There were significant differences in etomidate use between EM physicians and anesthesiologists in general rapid sequence intubation, noncritically ill patients, and those with undifferentiated hypotension. Both EM physicians and anesthesiologists describe the current etomidate controversy as significant and not adequately resolved.

Conclusion:

There is no significant difference in self-reported etomidate knowledge between anesthesiologists and EM physicians; however, significant practice pattern differences exist with EM physicians using etomidate more often. Broad agreement supports future research to investigate etomidate’s impact in critically ill patients.

Keywords

endotracheal intubation etomidate anesthesia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wagner

White

Kan

Rosenthal

Feldman

. Inhibition of adrenal steroidogenesis by the anesthetic etomidate. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(22):1415–1421.

Absalom

Pledger

Kong

. Adrenocortical function in critically ill patients 24 h after a single dose of etomidate. Anesthesia. 1999;54(9):861–867.

Diago

Amado

Otero

Lopez-Cordovilla

. Anti-adrenal action of a subanaesthetic dose of etomidate. Anaesthesia. 1988;43(8):644–645.

Vinclair

Broux

Faure

, et al. Duration of adrenal inhibition following a single dose of etomidate in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;4(4):714–719.

Marik

Zaloga

. Adrenal insufficiency in the critically ill: a new look at an old problem. CHEST J. 2002;122(5):1784–1796.

Hildreth

Mejia

Maxwell

Smith

Dart

Barker

. Adrenal suppression following a single dose of etomidate for rapid sequence induction: a prospective randomized study. J Trauma. 2008;65(3):573.

McPhee

Badawi

Fraser

, et al. Single-dose etomidate is not associated with increased mortality in ICU patients with sepsis: analysis of a large electronic ICU database. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(3):774–783.

Annane

. ICU physicians should abandon the use of etomidate!. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(3):325–326.

Komatsu

You

Mascha

Sessler

Kasuya

Turan

. Anesthetic induction with etomidate, rather than propofol, is associated with increased 30-day mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(6):1329–1337.

10.

Chan

Mitchell

Shorr

. Etomidate is associated with mortality and adrenal insufficiency in sepsis: a meta-analysis. Critical Care Med. 2012;40(11):2945–2953.

11.

Bruder

Ball

Ridi

Pickett

Hohl

. Single induction dose of etomidate versus other induction agents for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010225.

12.

Brown

Bair

Pallin

Walls

; NEAR III Investigators. Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(4):363–370.

13.

Bigham

Dainty

Scales

Morrison

Brooks

. Predictors of adopting therapeutic hypothermia for post-cardiac arrest patients among Canadian emergency and critical care physicians. Resuscitation. 2010;81(1):20–24.

14.

Kellerman

Herold

. Physician response to surveys: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):61–67.

15.

Epstein

Franks

Fiscella

, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient–physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1516–1528.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.27 MB