In this study, we investigate the formation of calcium and phosphorus-doped TiO2 nanotubes, produced by potentiostatic anodization of Ti in viscous electrolyte-containing HF and Ca/P ions. Characterization of the produced oxide layer was conducted using scanning electron microscopy, glancing-angle X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, contact angle, and protein adsorption measurements. Adipose-derived stem cells were used to study material cytotoxicity, cell viability and proliferation, and cell morphology and growth. To evaluate the adipose-derived stem-cell differentiation, we investigated the expression of osteocalcin and osteopontin by cells as well as calcium mineralization. Results show that it was possible to produce a superhydrophilic titanium oxide nanotube layer with incorporation of Ca and P ions. The presence of Ca and P in the oxide layer not only improved the cell adhesion and proliferation but also stimulated the production of key marker proteins indicating differentiation of cells.
SulYTJoanssonCBJeongYet al.
The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng Phys2001;
23: 329–334.
2.
KirmanidouYSidiraMDrosouMEet al.New Ti-alloys and surface modifications to improve the mechanical properties and the biological response to orthopedic and dental implants: A review. Biomed Res Int2016; Article ID 2908570, 21 pages. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2908570.
SulYTJohanssonCBWennerbergAet al.
Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: Surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Max Impl2005;
20: 349–359.
5.
Velasco-OrtegaEAlfonso-RodríguezCAMonsalve-GuilLet al.
Relevant aspects in the surface properties in titanium dental implants for the cellular viability. Mater Sci Eng C2016;
64: 1–10.
6.
JägerMJennissenHPDittrichFet al.
Antimicrobial and osseointegration properties of nanostructured titanium orthopaedic implants. Materials2017;
10: E1302.
7.
HilbornJBjurstenLM.A new and evolving paradigm for biocompatibility. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2007;
1: 110–119.
8.
ZhuXChenJScheidelerLet al.
Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials2004;
25: 4087–4103.
9.
CaiKFrantMBossertJet al.
Surface functionalized titanium thin films: Zeta-potential, protein adsorption and cell proliferation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2006;
50: 1–8.
10.
FengBWengJYangBCet al.
Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials2003;
24: 4663–4670.
11.
FengBWengJYangBCet al.
Characterization of titanium surfaces with calcium and phosphate and osteoblast adhesion. Biomaterials2004;
25: 3421–3428.
12.
DingXZhouLWangJet al.
The effects of hierarchical micro/nanosurfaces decorated with TiO2 nanotubes on the bioactivity of titanium implants in vitro and in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine2015;
10: 6955–6973.
13.
Le GuéhennecLSoueidanALayrollePet al.
Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dental Mater2007;
23: 844–854.
14.
ErikssonCLausmaaJNygrenH.Interactions between human whole blood and modified TiO2 surfaces: Influence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation. Biomaterials2001;
22: 1987–1996.
15.
ShalabiMMGortemakerAVan’t HofMAet al.
Implant surface roughness and bone healing: A systematic review. J Dent Res2006;
85: 496–500.
16.
PopatKCLeoniLGrimesCAet al.
Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials2007;
28: 3188–3197.
17.
OhSDaraioCChenLHet al.
Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A2006;
78A: 97–103.
18.
BjurstenLMRasmussonLOhSet al.
Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res2010;
92: 1218–1224.
BrettPMHarleJSalihVet al.
Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone2004;
35: 124–133.
21.
BressanESbricoliLGuazzoRet al.
Nanostructured surfaces of dental implants. IJMS2013;
14: 1918–1931.
22.
McMahonREWangLSkorackiRet al.
Development of nanomaterials for bone repair and regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res2013;
101: 387–397.
23.
ZwillingVDarque-CerettiEBoutry-ForveilleAet al.
Structure and physicochemistry of anodic oxide films on titanium and TA6V alloy. Surf Interface Anal1999;
27: 629–637.
24.
GongDGrimesCAVargheseOKet al.
Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation. J Mater Res2001;
16: 3331–3334.
25.
RoyPBergerSSchmukiP.TiO2 nanotubes: Synthesis and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed2011;
50: 2904–2939.
26.
MacakJMTsuchiyaHGhicovAet al.
TiO2 nanotubes: Self-organized electrochemical formation, properties and applications. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci2007;
11: 3–18.
27.
MacdonaldDEDeoNMarkovicBet al.
Adsorption and dissolution behavior of human plasma fibronectin on thermally and chemically modified titanium dioxide particles. Biomaterials2002;
23: 1269–1279.
28.
JonesFH.Teeth and bones: Applications of surface science to dental materials and related biomaterials. Surf Sci Rep2001;
42: 75–205.
29.
EllingsenJE.A study on the mechanism of protein adsorption to TiO2. Biomaterials1991;
12: 593–596.
30.
HanawaTKamiuraYYamamotoSet al.
Early bone formation around calcium-ion-implanted titanium inserted into rat tibia. J Biomed Mater Res1997;
36: 131–136.
31.
GuoCYMatinlinnaJPTangATH.Effects of surface charges on dental implants: Past, present, and future. Int J Biomater2012; Article ID 381535: 1–5. DOI: 10.1155/2012/381535.
32.
WangKZhouCHongYet al.
A review of protein adsorption on bioceramics. Interface Focus2012;
2: 259–277.
33.
ParkSWooTGJeonWYet al.
Surface characteristics of titanium anodized in the four different types of electrolyte. Electrochim Acta2007;
53: 863–870.
34.
LiuFSongYWangFet al.
Formation characterization of hydroxyapatite on titanium by microarc oxidation and hydrothermal treatment. J Biosci Bioeng2005;
100: 100–104.
35.
MarquesISVCruzNCLandersRet al.
Incorporation of Ca, P, and Si on bioactive coatings produced by plasma electrolytic oxidation: The role of electrolyte concentration and treatment duration. Biointerphases2015;
10: 041002.
36.
ZhuXKimKHJeongY.Anodic oxide films containing Ca and P of titanium biomaterial. Biomaterials2001;
22: 2199–2206.
37.
SulYTByonESJeongY.Biomechanical measurements of calcium‐incorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: Effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res2004;
6: 101–110.
38.
LaurindoCAHTorresRDMaliSAet al.
Incorporation of Ca and P on anodized titanium surface: Effect of high current density. Mater Sci Eng C2014;
37: 223–231.
39.
ChoiJWHeoSJKoakJYet al.
Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages. J Oral Rehabil2006;
33: 889–897.
40.
OliveiraNCMMouraCCGZanetta-BarbosaDet al.
Effects of titanium surface anodization with CaP incorporation on human osteoblastic response. Mater Sci Eng C2013;
33: 1958–1962.
41.
LiBHaoJMinYet al.
Biological properties of nanostructured Ti incorporated with Ca, P and Ag by electrochemical method. Mater Sci Eng2015;
51: 80–86.
42.
IndiraKKamachiMUNishimuraTet al.
A review on TiO2 nanotubes: Influence of anodization parameters, formation mechanism, properties, corrosion behavior, and biomedical applications.J Bio Tribo Corros2015;
1: 1–22.
43.
AlvesSARibeiroARGemini-PiperniSet al.
Nanotubes enriched with calcium, phosphorous and zinc: Promising bio-selective functional surfaces for osseointegrated titanium implants. RSC Adv2017;
7: 49720–49738.
44.
AlvesSAPatelSBSukotjoCet al.
Synthesis of calcium-phosphorous doped TiO2 nanotubes by anodization and reverse polarization: A promising strategy for an efficient biofunctional implant surface. App Surf Sci2017;
399: 682–701.
KodamaABauerSKomatsuAet al.
Bioactivation of titanium surfaces using coatings of TiO2 nanotubes rapidly pre-loaded with synthetic hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater2009;
5: 2322–2330.
47.
MinagarSBerndtCCWangJet al.
A review of the application of anodization for the fabrication of nanotubes on metal implant surfaces. Acta Biomater2012;
8: 2875–2888.
48.
GaoXZhouBYuanR.Doping a metal (Ag, Al, Mn, Ni and Zn) on TiO2 nanotubes and its effect on Rhodamine B photocatalytic oxidation. Environ Eng Res2015;
20: 329–335.
49.
XueCWangWHanTet al.
Boron-doped TiO2 nanotube array: In-situ electrochemical preparation and study on its photocatalytic activity. Chem Lett2016;
45: 1460–1462.
50.
PhotharinSTipparachU.Preparation and microstructure of Ag-doped TiO2 nanotubes by anodization method. Int J Appl Eng Res2017;
12: 1350–1354.
51.
UchidaMKimHMKokuboTet al.
Structural dependence of apatite formation on titania gels in a simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res A2003;
64: 164–170.
52.
WangGLiJLvKet al.
Surface thermal oxidation on titanium implants to enhance osteogenic activity and in vivo osseointegration. Sci Rep2016;
6: 31769.
53.
MoulderJFStickleWFSobolPEet al.Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Chastan J, ed). Eden Praire, USA: Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1992.
54.
HanSCDohJMYoonJKet al.
Highly ordered self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays prepared by a multi-step anodic oxidation process. Met Mater Int2009;
15: 493–499.
55.
ErdemBHunsickerRASimmonsGWet al.
XPS and FTIR surface characterization of TiO2 particles used in polymer encapsulation. Langmuir2001;
17: 2664–2669.
GittensRAOlivares-NavarreteRChengAet al.
The roles of titanium surface micro/nanotopography and wettability on the differential response of human osteoblast lineage cells. Acta Biomater2013;
9: 6268–6277.
58.
SmithBSYoriyaSGrissomLet al.
Hemocompatibility of titania nanotube arrays. J Biomed Mater Res A2010;
95A: 350–360.
59.
ZengHChitturKKLacefieldWR.Analysis of bovine serum albumin adsorption on calcium phosphate and titanium surfaces. Biomaterials1999;
20: 377–384.
60.
NordeW.Driving forces for protein adsorption at solid surfaces. Macromol Symp1996;
103: 5–18.
61.
KohaviDHauslichLBRosenGet al.
Wettability versus electrostatic forces in fibronectin and albumin adsorption to titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Impl Res2013;
24: 1002–1008.
62.
Al-NasirySHanssensMLuytenCet al.
The use of Alamar Blue assay for quantitative analysis of viability, migration and invasion of choriocarcinoma cells. Hum Reprod2007;
22: 1304–1309.
63.
O’BrienJWilsonIOrtonTet al.
Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur J Biochem2000;
267: 5421–5426.
64.
RobinsonRA.Bone tissue: Composition and function. Johns Hopkins Med J1979;
145: 10–24.
65.
ToppetsVPastoretVDe BehrVet al.
Morphologie, croissance et remaniement du tissu osseux. Ann MédVét2004;
148: 1–13.
66.
SteinGSLianJBOwenTA.Relationship of cell growth to the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression during osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J1990;
4: 3111–3123.
67.
GrafenauPCarstanjenBLepageOM.Osteocalcin: A biochemical marker of bone formation in equine medicine. Vet Med2000;
45: 209–216.
