Natural polysaccharides have recently attracted attention as structural biomaterials to replace focal chondral defects. In the present study, in-vitro tribological performance of methacrylated κ-carrageenan and gellan gum hydrogels (KA-MA and GG-MA) was evaluated under physiological conditions. Coefficient of friction (COF) was continuously recorded over testing whilst worn area was measured post-testing. The findings help improve our understanding of KA-MA-H and GG-MA-H tribological performance under various physiological conditions. The friction and wear performance of the hydrogels improved in bovine calf serum lubricant at lower applied loads. Adhesion was the dominant wear mechanism detected by SEM. Among the proposed hydrogels GG-MA-H found robust mechanical properties, increased wear resistance and considerably low COF, which may suggest its potential usage as a cartilage substitute.
ChenLZhengJJYLiG, et al.Pathogenesis and clinical management of obesity-related knee osteoarthritis: Impact of mechanical loading. J Orthopaedic Translation2020; 24: 66–75, DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.05.001.
2.
MalyMR. Abnormal and cumulative loading in knee osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol2008; 20: 547–552. DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328307f58c.
3.
YangFZhaoJKoshutWJ, et al.A synthetic hydrogel composite with the mechanical behavior and durability of cartilage. Adv Funct Mater2020; 30: 2003451, DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202003451.
4.
XuYXuYBiB, et al.A moldable thermosensitive hydroxypropyl chitin hydrogel for 3D cartilage regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater2020; 108: 87–96, DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.039.
5.
RibeiroVPda Silva MoraisAMaiaFR, et al.Combinatory approach for developing silk fibroin scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater2018; 72: 167–181, DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.047.
6.
MilnerPEParkesMPuetzerJL, et al.A low friction, biphasic and boundary lubricating hydrogel for cartilage replacement. Acta Biomater2018; 65: 102–111, DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.002.
7.
ForsterHFisherJ. The influence of loading time and lubricant on the friction of articular cartilage. Proc Inst Mech Eng H: J Eng Med1996; 210: 109–119. DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_399_02.
8.
Sánchez-TéllezDATéllez-JuradoLRodríguez-LorenzoLM. Hydrogels for cartilage regeneration, from polysaccharides to hybrids. Polymers2017; 9: 671.
9.
ParkesMTalliaFYoungGR, et al.Tribological evaluation of a novel hybrid for repair of articular cartilage defects. Mater Sci Eng C2021; 119: 111495, DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111495.
10.
ChaudhuriOGuLKlumpersD, et al.Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater2016; 15: 326–334. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4489.
11.
MostakhdeminMNandARamezaniM. A novel assessment of microstructural and mechanical behaviour of bilayer silica-reinforced nanocomposite hydrogels as a candidate for artificial cartilage. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Materials2021; 116: 104333, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104333.
NamSStowersRLouJ, et al.Varying PEG density to control stress relaxation in alginate-PEG hydrogels for 3D cell culture studies. Biomaterials2019; 200: 15–24, DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.004.
14.
IslamMMShahruzzamanMBiswasS, et al.Chitosan based bioactive materials in tissue engineering applications-a review. Bioactive Mater2020; 5: 164–183, DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.012.
15.
AhmadSAhmadMManzoorK, et al.A review on latest innovations in natural gums based hydrogels: Preparations & applications. Int J Biol Macromolecules2019; 136: 870–890, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.113.
16.
MeansAKGrunlanMA. Modern strategies to achieve tissue-mimetic, mechanically robust hydrogels. ACS Macro Lett2019; 8: 705–713. DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00276.
17.
GuZHuangKLuoY, et al.Double network hydrogel for tissue engineering. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology2018; 10: e1520, DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1520.
18.
TavakoliSKharazihaMKermanpurA, et al.Sprayable and injectable visible-light Kappa-carrageenan hydrogel for in-situ soft tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromolecules2019; 138: 590–601, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.126.
19.
PettinelliNRodríguez-LlamazaresSAbellaV, et al.Entrapment of chitosan, pectin or κ-carrageenan within methacrylate based hydrogels: effect on swelling and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 96: 583–590, DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.071.
20.
ShinHOlsenBDKhademhosseiniA. The mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of cell-laden double-network hydrogels based on photocrosslinkable gelatin and gellan gum biomacromolecules. Biomaterials2012; 33: 3143–3152, DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.050.
21.
Silva-CorreiaJZavanBVindigniV, et al.Biocompatibility evaluation of ionic-and photo-crosslinked methacrylated gellan gum hydrogels: in vitro and in vivo study. Adv Healthc Mater2013; 2: 568–575, DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201200256.
22.
PopaEGCaridadeSGManoJF, et al.Chondrogenic potential of injectable κ-carrageenan hydrogel with encapsulated adipose stem cells for cartilage tissue-engineering applications. J Tissue Eng Regenerative Med2015; 9: 550–563, DOI: 10.1002/term.1683.
23.
ZongHWangBLiG, et al.Biodegradable high-strength hydrogels with injectable performance based on poly (l-glutamic acid) and gellan gum. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2020; 6: 4702–4713. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00915.
24.
JiangZTominagaTKamataK, et al.Surface friction of gellan gels. Colloids Surf A: Physicochemical Eng Aspects2006; 284-285: 56–60, DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.11.080.
25.
TangYSunJFanH, et al.An improved complex gel of modified gellan gum and carboxymethyl chitosan for chondrocytes encapsulation. Carbohydr Polym2012; 88: 46–53, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.058.
26.
AgnelloSGasperiniLManoJF, et al.Synthesis, mechanical and thermal rheological properties of new gellan gum derivatives. Int J Biol Macromolecules2017; 98: 646–653, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.029.
27.
PereiraDRCanadasRFSilva-CorreiaJ, et al.Injectable gellan-gum/hydroxyapatite-based bilayered hydrogel composites for osteochondral tissue regeneration. Appl Mater Today2018; 12: 309–321, DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.06.005.
28.
KorhonenRKLaasanenMSTöyräsJ, et al.Comparison of the equilibrium response of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, confined compression and indentation. J Biomech2002; 35: 903–909, DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00052-0.
29.
WangCC-BDengJ-MAteshianGA, et al.An automated approach for direct measurement of two-dimensional strain distributions within articular cartilage under unconfined compression. J Biomechanical Eng2002; 124: 557–567. DOI: 10.1115/1.1503795.
30.
BoschettiFPennatiGGervasoF, et al.Biomechanical properties of human articular cartilage under compressive loads. Biorheology2004; 41: 159–166.
31.
HasanyMTalebianSSadatS, et al.Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of alginate methacrylate (ALMA)-based hydrogels: Current advances and challenges. Appl Mater Today2021; 24: 101150, DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101150.
32.
MihailaSMGaharwarAKReisRL, et al.Photocrosslinkable Kappa-Carrageenan hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Adv Healthc Mater2013; 2: 895–907, DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201200317.
33.
ThakurAJaiswalMKPeakCW, et al.Injectable shear-thinning nanoengineered hydrogels for stem cell delivery. Nanoscale2016; 8: 12362–12372. DOI: 10.1039/c6nr02299e.
34.
CoutinhoDFSantSVShinH, et al.Modified gellan gum hydrogels with tunable physical and mechanical properties. Biomaterials2010; 31: 7494–7502, DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.035.
35.
Silva-CorreiaJOliveiraJMCaridadeSG, et al.Gellan gum-based hydrogels for intervertebral disc tissue-engineering applications. J Tissue Eng Regenerative Med2011; 5: e97–e107, DOI: 10.1002/term.363.
36.
PacelliSPaolicelliPDreesenI, et al.Injectable and photocross-linkable gels based on gellan gum methacrylate: a new tool for biomedical application. Int J Biol Macromolecules2015; 72: 1335–1342, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.10.046.
37.
PacelliSPaolicelliPAvitabileM, et al.Design of a tunable nanocomposite double network hydrogel based on gellan gum for drug delivery applications. Eur Polym J2018; 104: 184–193, DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.04.034.
38.
GarrecDANortonIT. Kappa carrageenan fluid gel material properties. part 2: tribology. Food Hydrocolloids2013; 33: 160–167, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.01.019.
39.
HuJAndablo-ReyesESoltanahmadiS, et al.Synergistic microgel-reinforced hydrogels as high-performance lubricants. ACS Macro Lett2020; 9: 1726–1731. DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00689.
40.
StokesJRMacakovaLChojnicka-PaszunA, et al.Lubrication, adsorption, and rheology of aqueous polysaccharide solutions. Langmuir2011; 27: 3474–3484. DOI: 10.1021/la104040d.
41.
ScholesSCColledgeCJNaylorA, et al.Potential synthetic biolubricant as an alternative to bovine serum. Lubricants2016; 4: 38.
42.
KozbialALiL. Study on the friction of κ-carrageenan hydrogels in air and aqueous environments. Mater Sci Eng C2014; 36: 173–179, DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.12.003.
43.
TanJJoynerHS. Characterizing wear behaviors of edible hydrogels by kernel-based statistical modeling. J Food Eng2020; 275: 109850, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109850.
44.
TanJJoynerHS. Characterizing wear behaviors of κ-carrageenan and whey protein gels by numerical modeling. J Food Eng2018; 235: 98–105, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.05.002.
45.
ZhuYBhandariBPrakashS. Tribo-Rheometry behaviour and gel strength of κ-carrageenan and gelatin solutions at concentrations, pH and ionic conditions used in dairy products. Food Hydrocolloids2018; 84: 292–302, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.06.016.
46.
AffatatoSTruccoDTaddeiP, et al.Wear behavior characterization of hydrogels constructs for cartilage tissue replacement. Materials2021; 14: 428.
47.
TruccoDVannozziLTeblumE, et al.Graphene oxide-doped gellan gum–pegda bilayered hydrogel mimicking the mechanical and lubrication properties of articular cartilage. Adv Healthc Mater2021; 10: 2001434, DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202001434.
48.
KancaYMilnerPDiniD, et al.Tribological properties of PVA/PVP blend hydrogels against articular cartilage. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Materials2018; 78: 36–45, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.027.
49.
Kılıç SuloğluAÖzkahramanBÖzbaşZ, et al.Evaluation of kappa carrageenan and gelatin based sponges for dental applications. Chem Pap2022; 76: 4005–4015. DOI: 10.1007/s11696-022-02149-5.
50.
TamahkarEÖzkahramanBÖzbaşZ, et al.Aloe vera-based antibacterial porous sponges for wound dressing applications. J Porous Mater2021; 28: 741–750. DOI: 10.1007/s10934-020-01029-1.
51.
KancaYMilnerPDiniD, et al.Tribological evaluation of biomedical polycarbonate urethanes against articular cartilage. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Materials2018; 82: 394–402, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.001.
52.
ParkesMMyantCDiniD, et al.Tribology-optimised silk protein hydrogels for articular cartilage repair. Tribology Int2015; 89: 9–18, DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2014.11.024.
53.
ParkesMCannPJeffersJ. Real-time observation of fluid flows in tissue during stress relaxation using Raman spectroscopy. J Biomech2017; 60: 261–265, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.004.
54.
ShiYXiongDSPengY, et al.Effects of polymerization degree on recovery behavior of PVA/PVP hydrogels as potential articular cartilage prosthesis after fatigue test. Express Polym Lett2016; 10: 125–138, DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.13.
55.
CovertRJOttRDKuDN. Friction characteristics of a potential articular cartilage biomaterial. Wear2003; 255: 1064–1068, DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00113-3.
56.
KupratisMEGureAEOrtvedKF, et al.Comparative tribology: articulation-induced rehydration of cartilage across species. Biotribology2021; 25: 100159, DOI: 10.1016/j.biotri.2020.100159.
57.
LiFWangAWangC. Analysis of friction between articular cartilage and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel artificial cartilage. J Mater Sci Mater Med2016; 27: 87. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-016-5700-y.
58.
MahmoodHEckoldDSteadI, et al.A method for the assessment of the coefficient of friction of articular cartilage and a replacement biomaterial. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Materials2020; 103: 103580, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103580.
59.
BrancoACOliveiraASMonteiroI, et al.PVA-Based hydrogels loaded with diclofenac for cartilage replacement. Gels2022; 8: 143.
60.
McCannLUdofiaIGraindorgeS, et al.Tribological testing of articular cartilage of the medial compartment of the knee using a friction simulator. Tribology Int2008; 41: 1126–1133, DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.03.012.
61.
AgibayevaLEKaldybekovDBPorfiryevaNN, et al.Gellan gum and its methacrylated derivatives as in situ gelling mucoadhesive formulations of pilocarpine: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Pharmaceutics2020; 577: 119093, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119093.
62.
LokhandeGCarrowJKThakurT, et al.Nanoengineered injectable hydrogels for wound healing application. Acta Biomater2018; 70: 35–47, DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.045.
63.
SonawaneROPatilSD. Fabrication and statistical optimization of starch-κ-carrageenan cross-linked hydrogel composite for extended release pellets of zaltoprofen. Int J Biol Macromolecules2018; 120: 2324–2334, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.177.
64.
PrezottiFGCuryBSFEvangelistaRC. Mucoadhesive beads of gellan gum/pectin intended to controlled delivery of drugs. Carbohydr Polym2014; 113: 286–295, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.021.
65.
XuZLiZJiangS, et al.Chemically modified gellan gum hydrogels with tunable properties for use as tissue engineering scaffolds. ACS Omega2018; 3: 6998–7007. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00683.
66.
ÖzkahramanBÖzbaşZ. Removal of Al(III) ions using gellan gum-acrylic acid double network hydrogel. J Polym Environ2020; 28: 689–698. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-019-01636-3.
67.
MokhtariHKharazihaMKarimzadehF, et al.An injectable mechanically robust hydrogel of Kappa-carrageenan-dopamine functionalized graphene oxide for promoting cell growth. Carbohydr Polym2019; 214: 234–249, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.030.
68.
ArjmandiMRamezaniM. Mechanical and tribological assessment of silica nanoparticle-alginate-polyacrylamide nanocomposite hydrogels as a cartilage replacement. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Materials2019; 95: 196–204, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.020.
69.
WangZLiJLiuY, et al.Macroscale superlubricity achieved between zwitterionic copolymer hydrogel and sapphire in water. Mater Des2020; 188: 108441, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108441.
70.
RongMLiuHScaraggiM, et al.High lubricity meets load capacity: cartilage mimicking bilayer structure by brushing up stiff hydrogels from subsurface. Adv Funct Mater2020; 30: 2004062, DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202004062.
71.
MowVCKueiSCLaiWM, et al.Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: theory and experiments. J Biomechanical Eng1980; 102: 73–84. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138202.
72.
OsaheniAOFinkelsteinEBMatherPT, et al.Synthesis and characterization of a zwitterionic hydrogel blend with low coefficient of friction. Acta Biomater2016; 46: 245–255, DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.022.
73.
KrishnanRKopaczMAteshianGA. Experimental verification of the role of interstitial fluid pressurization in cartilage lubrication. J Orthopaedic Res2004; 22: 565–570, DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.07.002.
74.
ArjmandiMRamezaniMNandA, et al.Experimental study on friction and wear properties of interpenetrating polymer network alginate-polyacrylamide hydrogels for use in minimally-invasive joint implants. Wear2018; 406-407: 194–204, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2018.04.013.
75.
ShiYXiongDLiuY, et al.Swelling, mechanical and friction properties of PVA/PVP hydrogels after swelling in osmotic pressure solution. Mater Sci Eng C2016; 65: 172–180, DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.042.
76.
ChenJMoschakisTNelsonP. Application of surface friction measurements for surface characterization of heat-set whey protein gels. J Texture Stud2004; 35: 493–510, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2004.35502.x.
77.
BrandRA. Joint contact stress: a reasonable surrogate for biological processes?Iowa Orthop J2005; 25: 82–94.
78.
GongJPIwasakiYOsadaY. Friction of gels. 5. Negative load dependence of polysaccharide gels. The J Phys Chem B2000; 104: 3423–3428. DOI: 10.1021/jp992277v.
79.
KattaJKMarcolongoMLowmanA, et al.Friction and wear behavior of poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) hydrogels for articular cartilage replacement. J Biomed Mater Res A2007; 83A: 471–479, DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31238.
80.
DuongC-TLeeJ-HChoY, et al.Effect of protein concentrations of bovine serum albumin and γ-globulin on the frictional response of a cobalt-chromium femoral head. J Mater Sci Mater Med2012; 23: 1323–1330. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-012-4603-9.
81.
MostakhdeminMNandARamezaniM. Tribological assessments of bilayer titanium nanocomposite hydrogels for cartilage replacement in articular joints. Wear2021; 484-485: 204017. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.204017.
82.
Duque-OssaLCRuiz-PulidoGMedinaDI. Triborheological Study under physiological conditions of PVA hydrogel/HA lubricant as synthetic system for soft tissue replacement. Polymers2021; 13: 746.
83.
BurrisDLRamseyLGrahamBT, et al.How sliding and hydrodynamics contribute to articular cartilage fluid and lubrication recovery. Tribology Lett2019; 67: 46. DOI: 10.1007/s11249-019-1158-7.
