Planners are finding it increasingly helpful to use conflict resolution techniques to manage conditions of uncertainty and conflict endemic to environmental and land use planning, and public policy making. Some disputes in these areas, however, are by their very nature unusually resistant to resolution, rendering them especially difficult for planners to manage without significant mediation training and skill. By exploring the literature on dispute intractability, this article maps for planners characteristics of intractable environmental, land use, and public policy disputes and discusses the usefulness of the transformative mediation approach for managing intractable disputes. Empirical research on dispute intractability, now in its nascent stages, could be productively applied by planners in making conflict assessments and applying dispute resolution techniques in planning practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amy, Douglas J. 1990. Environmental dispute resolution: The promise and the pitfalls. In Environmental policy in the 1990s: Toward a new agenda, Norman J. Vig and Michael E. Kraft, eds. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press .
2.
Amy, Douglas J. 1987. The politics of environmental mediation. New York: Columbia University Press .
3.
Beckman, Norman. 1973. The planner as bureaucrat. Reprinted in A Reader in Planning Theory, Andreas Faludi, ed. New York: Pergamon .
4.
Original article , Journal of the American Institute of Plan-ners30, 4: 323-327 , 1964.
5.
Bingham, Gail. 1986. Resolving environmental disputes: Adecade of experience. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation .
6.
Borrelli, Peter. 1988. The ecophilosophers. In Crossroads: Environmental priorities for the future, Peter Borrelli, ed. Washington, DC: Island Press .
7.
Brett, Jeanne M., Debra L. Shapiro, and Anne L. Lytle. 1996. Refocusing rights- and power-oriented negotiators toward integrative negotiations: Process and outcome effects . Paper presented at Academy of Management Proceedings, August 11-14, Cincinnati, OH.
8.
Brooke, James. 1998. Sprawling Albuquerque hopes to cut through monument . New York Times (January 25): 12 .
9.
Burgess, Guy, and Heidi Burgess. 1998. Some thoughts on intractable conflict: Conference framing essay . Paper presented at a meeting of the Hewlett-Funded Centers for the Study of Conflict Resolution and Negotiation, January 9-11, Palo Alto, CA.
10.
Burgess, Guy, and Heidi Burgess. 1995. Beyond the limits: Dispute resolution of intractable environmental conflicts. In Mediating environmental conflicts: Theory and practice, J. Walton Blackburn and Willa Marie Bruce, eds. Westport, CT: Quorum Books .
11.
Burgess, Heidi, and Guy Burgess. 1996. Constructive confrontation: A transformative approach to intractable conflicts . Mediation Quarterly13, 4: 305-322 .
12.
Bush, Robert A. Baruch, and Joseph P. Folger. 1994. The promise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
13.
Carpenter, Susan L., and W. J. D. Kennedy. 2001. Managing public disputes: A practical guide for government, business, and citizens groups. 2d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
14.
Catanese, Anthony J. 1984. The politics of planning and development. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
15.
Caton Campbell, Marcia. 1998. Exploring the characteristics of intractable environmental disputes . Paper presented at the 40th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, November 4-8, Pasadena, CA.
16.
Caton Campbell, Marcia, and Donald W. Floyd. 1996. Thinking critically about environmental mediation . Journal of Planning Literature10, 3: 235-247 .
17.
Christensen, Karen S. 1985. Coping with uncertainty in planning . Journal of the American Planning Association51, 1: 63-71 .
18.
Coleman, Peter T. 2000. Intractable conflict. In The handbook of conflict resolution, Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman, eds. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass .
19.
d‘Estrée, Tamara Pearson, and Bonnie G. Colby. 2000. Guidebook for analyzing success in environmental conflict resolution cases. Fairfax, VA: The Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University .
20.
Deutsch, Morton. 2000. A framework for thinking about research on conflict resolution training. In The handbook of conflict resolution, Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
21.
Dietz, Thomas. 2001. Thinking about environmental conflicts. In Celebrating scholarship, Lisa M. Kadous, ed. Fairfax, VA: College of Arts and Sciences, George Mason University .
22.
Dorius, Noah. 1993. Land use negotiation: Reducing conflict and creating wanted land uses . Journal of the American Planning Association59, 1: 101-106 .
23.
Dotson, A. Bruce, David Godschalk, and Jerome Kaufman. 1989. The planner as dispute resolver: Concepts and teaching materials. Washington, DC: National Institute for Dispute Resolution .
24.
Dukes, E. Franklin. 1996. Resolving public conflict: Transforming community and governance. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press .
25.
Fessenden, Lynne. 1999. Evaluating the success of the New Community Meeting II on issues of growth and sustainable development in central Lane County, Oregon (1997-1998). Eugene, OR: The Conflict Resolution Center .
26.
Floyd, Donald W. 1993. Managing rangeland resource conflicts . Rangelands15, 1: 27-30 .
27.
Forester, John. 1999. Dealing with deep value differences. In The consensus building handbook: Acomprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Lawrence Susskind, Sarah McKearnan, and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
28.
Forester, John. 1992. Envisioning the politics of public sector dispute resolution. In Studies in law, politics, and society, Susan S. Silbey and Austin Sarat, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI .
29.
Forester, John. 1987. Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulations . Journal of the American Planning Association53, 3: 303-314 .
30.
Forester, John, and David Stitzel. 1989. Beyond neutrality: The possibilities of activist mediation in public sector conflicts . Negotiation Journal5, 3: 251-264 .
31.
Friedmann, John, and Carol Kuester. 1994. Planning education for the late twentieth century: An initial inquiry . Journal of Planning Education and Research14, 1: 55-64 .
32.
Glavovic, Bruce C., E. Franklin Dukes, and Jana M. Lynott. 1997. Training and educating environmental mediators: Lessons from experience in the United States . Mediation Quarterly14, 4: 269-292 .
33.
Godschalk, David R. 1992. Negotiating intergovernmental policy conflicts: Practice-based guidelines . Journal of the American Planning Association58, 3: 368-378 .
34.
Gray, Barbara. 1997. Framing and reframing of intractable environmental disputes. In Research on negotiation in organizations, Roy J. Lewicki, Robert J. Bies, and Blair H. Sheppard, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI .
35.
Gray, Barbara, Julie Younglove-Webb, and Jill M. Purdy. 1997. Frame repertoires, conflict styles and negotiation outcomes . Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association of Conflict Management, June 15-19, Bonn, Germany.
Hamilton, Michael S. 1991. Environmental mediation: Requirements for successful institutionalization. In Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector, Miriam K. Mills, ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
38.
Howe, Elizabeth. 1992. Professional roles and the public interest in planning . Journal of Planning Literature6, 3: 230-248 .
39.
Hunter, Susan. 1989. The roots of environmental conflict in the Tahoe Basin. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press .
40.
Innes, Judith E. 1999. Evaluating consensus building. In The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Lawrence Susskind, Sarah McKearnan, and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
41.
Innes, Judith E., and David E. Booher. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: Aframework for evaluating collaborative planning . Journal of the American Planning Association65, 4: 412-423 .
42.
Jacobs, Harvey M., and Richard G. RuBino. 1988. Predicting the utility of environmental mediation: Natural resource and conflict typologies as a guide to environmental conflict assessment. Madison, WI: Institute for Legal Studies, Unviversity of Wisconsin Madison Law School .
Kriesberg, Louis. 1989. Conclusion: Research and policy implications. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press .
45.
Lewicki, Roy J., and Craig Davis. 1996. Environmental conflict frames in wetland conversion disputes . Paper presented at the Center for Research in Conflict and Negotiation, April 11, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
46.
Lewicki, Roy J., David M. Saunders, and John W. Minton. 2001. Essentials of negotiation. 2d ed. Chicago: Irwin .
47.
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. 1988. Natural resources dispute resolution: An overview . Natural Resources Journal28, 1: 5-19 .
48.
Maser, Chris. 1996. Resolving environmental conflict: Towards sustainable community development. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press .
49.
Meyerson, Martin, and Edward Banfield, eds. 1955. Politics, planning and the public interest. New York: Free Press .
50.
Northrup, Terrell A. 1989. The dynamic of identity in personal and social conflict. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press .
51.
Norton, Bryan G. 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press .
52.
O’Leary, Rosemary. 1995. Environmental mediation: What do we know and how do we know it? In Mediating environmental conflicts: Theory and practice, J. Walton Blackburn and Willa Marie Bruce, eds. Westport, CT: Quorum Books .
53.
O’Leary, Rosemary, Tracy Yandle, and Tamilyn Moore. 1999. The state of the states in environmental dispute resolution . Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution14, 2: 515-613 .
54.
Ozawa, Connie P. 1991. Recasting science: Consensual procedures in public policy making. Boulder, CO: Westview .
55.
Painter, An. 1988. The future of environmental dispute resolution . Natural Resources Journal28, 1: 145-170 .
56.
Pinkley, Robin L. 1990. Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict . Journal of Applied Psychology75, 2: 117-126 .
57.
Pinkley, Robin L., and Gregory B. Northcraft. 1994. Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes . Academy of Management Journal37, 1: 193-205 .
58.
Pruitt, Dean G., and Paul V. Olczak. 1995. Beyond hope: Approaches to resolving seemingly intractable conflict. In Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch, Barbara B. Bunker, Jeffrey Z. Rubin, and Associates, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
59.
Rabe, Barry G. 1991. Impediments to environmental dispute resolution in the American political context. In Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector, Miriam K. Mills, ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
60.
Rabinovitz, Francine F. 1989. The role of negotiation in planning, management, and policy analysis . Journal of Planning Education and Research8, 2: 87-95 .
61.
Rubinstein, Robert A. 1998. Intractable conflicts and possibilities for resolution: Conference framing essay . Paper presented at a meeting of the Hewlett-Funded Centers for the Study of Conflict Resolution and Negotiation, January 9-11, Palo Alto, CA.
62.
Schön, Donald A., and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books .
63.
Sheppard, Blair H. 1984. Third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. In Research in organizational behavior, Barry M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI .
64.
Sipe, Neil G. 1998. An empirical analysis of environmental mediation . Journal of the American Planning Association64, 3: 275-285 .
65.
Smyth, Leo F. 1994. Intractable conflict and the role of identity . Negotiation Journal10, 4: 311-321 .
66.
Socolow, Robert H. 1976. Failures of discourse: Obstacles to the integration of environmental values into natural resource policy. In When values conflict: Essays on environmental analysis, discourse, and decision, Lawrence A. Tribe, Corinne S. Schelling, and John Voss, eds. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger .
67.
Spain, Daphne. 1993. Been-heres versus come-heres: Negotiating conflicting community identities . Journal of the American Planning Association59, 2: 156-171 .
68.
Susskind, Lawrence, and the Consensus Building Institute. 1999. Using assisted negotiation to settle land use disputes: A guidebook for public officials. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy .
69.
Susskind, Lawrence, and Jeffrey Cruikshank. 1987. Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books .
70.
Susskind, Lawrence, and Patrick Field. 1996. Dealing with an angry public: The mutual gains approach to resolving disputes. New York: Free Press .
71.
Susskind, Lawrence, and Connie Ozawa. 1984. Mediated negotiation in the public sector: The planner as mediator . Journal of Planning Education and Research4, 1: 5-15 .
72.
Susskind, Lawrence, and Connie Ozawa. 1983. Mediated negotiation in the public sector: Mediator accountability and the public interest problem . American Behavioral Scientist27, 2: 255-279 .
73.
Susskind, Lawrence, and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer. 1999. Conducting a conflict assessment. In The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Lawrence Susskind, Sarah McKearnan, and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
74.
Susskind, Lawrence, Mieke van der Wansem, and Armand Ciccarelli. 2000. Mediating land use disputes: Pros and cons. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy .
75.
Thorson, Stuart J. 1989. Introduction: Conceptual issues. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press .
76.
Tribe, Lawrence H., Corinne S. Schelling, and John Voss, eds. 1976. When values conflict: Essays on environmental analysis, discourse, and decision. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger .
77.
Ury, William L., Jeanne M. Brett, and Stephen B. Goldberg. 1988. Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the costs of conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
78.
Wondolleck, Julia M., and Steven L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press .
79.
Yi, Gi-Chul. 1992. An analysis of disputants conflict frames relating to Ohio wetland conversion disputes. Ph.D. diss., School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
80.
Zartman, I. William, and Johannes Aurik. 1991. Power strategies in de-escalation. In Timing and the de-escalation of international conflicts, Louis Kriesberg and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press .
