Sustainable development has been accepted as a conceptual framework for local planning. However, there continues to be difficulty incorporating the full range of its components (i.e., balanced consideration of environment, economy, and equity) into local planning in the form of policies and programs. Apart of the reason for this difficulty is the continuing competition between two worldviews, the expansionist and ecological. The author proposes the incremental integration of the two worldviews through an overall strategy of action and the use of a decision model that incorporates project and context information to identify appropriate method and role. As the ecological worldview becomes more institutionalized, it is likely that its components will be increasingly reflected in community development strategies.
Ayres, R. U., and A. V. Kneese. 1989. Externalities: Economics and thermodynamics. In Economy and ecology: Towards sustainable development, edited by F. Archibugi and P. Nijkamp. Boston: Kluwer.
2.
Barbier, E. B.1987. The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation14 (2): 101-110.
3.
Beatley, T.1989. Environmental ethics and planning theory. Journal of Planning Literature4 (1): 1-32.
4.
Beatley, T.1995. Planning and sustainability: The elements of a new (improved?) paradigm. Journal of Planning Literature9 (4): 383-395.
5.
Beatley, T., and K. Manning. 1997. The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy, and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
6.
Berke, P. A.1995. Natural-hazard reduction and sustainable development: A global assessment. Journal of Planning Literature9 (4): 370-382.
7.
Berke, P. A., and J. Kartez. 1995. Sustainable development as a guide to land use policy. Research paper. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
8.
Berke, P. A., and M. Manta Conroy. 2000. Arewe planning for sustainable development?Journal of the American Planning Association66 (1): 1-13.
9.
Biddle, J. E.1990. Purpose and evolution in Commons’s institutionalism. History of Political Economy22 (1): 19-47.
10.
Blamey, R., and M. Common. 1994. Sustainability and the limits to pseudo market valuation. In Toward sustainable development, edited by J. C. J. M. van den Bergh and J. van der Straaten. Washington, DC: Island Press.
11.
Brown, L. R.2001. Eco-economy: Building an economy for the earth. New York: W. W. Norton.
12.
Campbell, S.1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities?Journal of the American Planning Association62 (3): 296-312.
13.
Carley, M., and I. Christie. 1993. Managing sustainable development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Chasse, J. D.1986. John R. Commons and the democratic state. Journal of Economic Issues20 (3): 759-784.
15.
Christensen, K. S.1985. Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association51 (1): 63-73.
16.
Commons, J. R.1931. Institutional economics. American Economic Review21 (December): 648-657.
17.
Costanza, R.1989. What is ecological economics?Ecological Economics1 (1): 1-7.
18.
Daly, H. E.1968. Oneconomics as a life science. Journal of Political Economy76 (May/June): 392-406.
19.
Daly, H. E.1989. Steady-state and growth concepts for the next century. In Economy and ecology: Towards sustainable development, edited by F. Archibugi and P. Nijkamp. Boston: Kluwer.
20.
Daly, H. E.1996. Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Boston: Beacon.
21.
Daly, H. E., and J. B. Cobb Jr.1989. For the commongood. Boston: Beacon.
22.
Davidoff, D.1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners31 (4): 331-338.
23.
Despotakis, V., M. Giaoutzi, and P. Nijkamp. 1992. Spatial depiction of local sustainable development. In M. J. Breheny (Ed.), Sustainable development and urban form. London: Pion.
24.
de Steiguer, J. E.1995. Three theories from economics about the environment. BioScience45 (8): 552-557.
25.
di Castri, F., and M. Hadley. 1986. Enhancing the credibility of ecology: Is interdisciplinary research for land use planning useful?Geo Journal13 (4): 299-325.
26.
Dubos, R.1981. Celebrations of life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Dugger, W.1984. Methodological differences between institutional and neoclassical economics. In D. M. Hausman (Ed.), The philosophy of economics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Dwyer, J. F., H. W. Schroeder, andP. H. Gobster. 1994. The deep significance of urban trees and forests. In The ecological city: Preserving and restoring urban biodiversity. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
29.
Ekins, P.1993. ‘Limits to growth’ and ‘sustainable development’: Grappling with ecological realities. Ecological Economics8 (3): 269-288.
30.
Fainstein, N. I., and S. S. Fainstein. 1982. New debates in urban planning: The impact of Marxist theory within the United States. In Critical readings in planning theory, edited by C. Paris. New York: Pergamon.
31.
Forester, J.1980. Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association46 (3): 275-286.
32.
Forester, J.1982. Planning in the face of power. Journal of the American Planning Association48 (1): 67-80.
33.
Forester, J.1985. Practical rationality in plan making. In Rationality in planning: Critical essays on the role of rationality in urban and regional planning, edited by M. Breheny and A. Hooper. London: Pion.
34.
Garbarino, J.1992. Toward a sustainable society. Chicago: Noble.
35.
Georgescu-Roegen, N.1971. The entropy law and the economic problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Giaoutzi, M.1990. Complexity in urban dynamics: A Greek example. In Sustainability of urban systems, edited by P. Nijkamp. Brookfield, VT: Grower.
37.
Girardet, H.1992. The Gaia atlas of cities. New York: Doubleday.
38.
Gottlieb, P. D.1995. The “golden egg” as a natural resource: Toward a normative theory of growth management. Society and Natural Resources8 (1): 49-56.
39.
Hardin, G.1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science162 (December): 1243-1248.
40.
Harper, T. L., and S. M. Stein. 1995. Planning theory for environmentally sustainable planning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Detroit, MI, October.
41.
Harris, C. C., and M. McGown. 1990. The propriety of applying economic methods to the allocation of public amenity resources: Paradigms, property rights, and progress. In Economic valuation of natural resources, edited by R. L. Johnson and G. Johnson. Boulder, CO: Westview.
42.
Harris, J. M., T. A. Wise, K. P. Gallagher, and N. R. Goodwin. 2001. A survey of sustainable development: Social and economic dimensions. Washington, DC: Island Press.
43.
Hart, M., M. Mazzotta, and K. Kellman. 1999. Measuring sustainability: An assessment of criteria for defining and selecting sustainability indicators. Montpelier, VT: Green Mountain Institute for Environmental Democracy.
44.
Haughton, G., and C. Hunter. 1994. Sustainable cities. London: Jessica Kingsley.
45.
Hawken, P., A. Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins. 1999. Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. Boston: Little, Brown.
46.
Howarth, R. B.1995. Sustainability under uncertainty: A deontological approach. Land Economics71 (4), 417-427.
47.
Hudson, B.1979. Comparison of current planning theories. Journal of the American Planning Association45 (4): 387-398.
48.
Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: Aframework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association65 (4): 412-423.
49.
Jacobs, M.1991. The green economy: Environment, sustainable development and the politics of the future. Concord, MA: Pluto.
50.
James, D. E., P. Nijkamp, and J. B. Opschoor. 1989. Ecological sustainability and economic development. In Economy and ecology: Towards sustainable development, edited by F. Archibugi and P. Nijkamp. Boston: Kluwer.
51.
Jepson, E. J., Jr.2001. Sustainability and planning: Diverse concepts andclose associations. Journal of Planning Literature15 (4): 499-510.
52.
Jepson, E. J., Jr.2003. The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in U.S. cities: How wide, how deep, and what role for planners?Journal of Planning Education and Research23 (2): 1-13.
53.
Jones, A.1996. The psychology of sustainability: What planners can learn from attitude research. Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (1): 56-65.
54.
Kartez, J. D.1989. Rational arguments and irrational audiences. Journal of the American Planning Association55 (4): 445-456.
55.
Kinsley, M.1994. Sustainable development—prosperity without growth. Public ManagementOctober:6-9.
56.
Kraushaar, R.1988. Outside the whale: Progressive planning and the dilemma of radical reform. Journal of the American Planning Association54 (1): 91-100.
57.
Lyle, J. T.1994. Regenerative design for sustainable development. New York: John Wiley.
58.
Lynch, K.1981. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
59.
Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, and J. Randers. 1992. Beyond the limits. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.
60.
Mollison, B.1990. Permaculture: Apractical guide for a sustainable future. Washington, DC: Island Press.
61.
Munn, R. E.1989. Towards sustainable development: An environmental perspective. In Economy and ecology: Towards sustainable development, edited by F. Archibugi and P. Nijkamp. Boston: Kluwer.
62.
Nijkamp, P., P. Lasschuit, and F. Soeteman. 1992. Sustainable development in a regional system. In Sustainable development and urban form, edited by M. J. Breheny. London: Pion.
63.
Norgaard, R. B.1989. The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics1 (1): 37-57.
64.
Platt, R. H.1994. The ecological city: Introduction and overview. In The ecological city: Preserving and restoring urban diversity, edited by R. H. Platt, R. A. Rowntree, and P. C. Muick. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
65.
Proops, J. L. R.1989. Ecological economics: Rationale and problem areas. Ecological Economics1 (1): 59-76.
66.
Rees, W. E.1989. Defining “sustainable development.”CHS Research Bulletin. Vancouver, BC: Center for Human Settlements, University of British Columbia.
67.
Rees, W. E.1990. Planning for sustainable development: Aresource book. Proceedings of a symposium organized by the School of Community and Regional Planning, the University of British Columbia, November 25-27, 1988. Vancouver, BC: Centre for Human Settlements.
68.
Rees, W. E.1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization4 (2): 121-130.
69.
Rees, W. E.1995. Achieving sustainability: Reform or transformation?Journal of Planning Literature9 (4): 343-361.
70.
Rees, W. E., and M. Roseland. 1991. Sustainable communities: Planning for the 21st century. Plan Canada31 (3): 15-26.
71.
Ruckelshaus, W. D.1989. Toward a sustainable world. Scientific American261 (3): 166-174.
72.
Rutherford, M.1983. J. R. Commons’s institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues17 (3): 721-744.
73.
Rydin, Y.1992. Environmental impacts and the property market. In M. J. Breheny (Ed.), Sustainable development and urban form. London: Pion.
74.
Scruggs, P.1993. Chapter 1: Definitions and principles. In Guidelines for state level sustainable development, edited by S. Park. Chapel Hill: Center for Policy Alternatives and Environmental Resource Program, University of North Carolina.
75.
Simon, H. A.1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society16 (1): 41-48.
76.
Smit, B., and M. Brklacich. 1989. Sustainable development and the analysis of rural systems. Journal of Rural Studies5 (4): 405-414.
77.
Smith, T. W.1996. Sustainable communities in the urban-rural interface. Small Town & Rural PlanningMarch:8-12.
78.
Spain, D.1995. Sustainability, feminist visions, and the utopian tradition. Journal of Planning Literature9 (4): 362-369.
79.
Stone, P. A.1973. The structure, size, and costs of urban settlements. Cambridge, UK: University Printing House.
80.
Thomas, D. K., and O. J. Furuseth. 1997. The realities of incorporating sustainable development into local-level planning: Acase study of Davidson, North Carolina. Cities14 (4): 219-226.
81.
Tisdell, C. A.1988. Environmental conservation: Economics, ecology, and ethics. Environmental Conservation16 (2): 107-308.
82.
Webster’s new collegiate dictionary. 1980. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam.
83.
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84.
Wackernagel, M., andW. Rees. 1996. Our ecological footprint. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society.
85.
Weintraub, E. R.2003. Neoclassical economics. In the concise encyclopedia of economics, www.econlib.org/library/Enc/NenclassicalEconomics.html.
86.
White, R. R.1994. Urban environmental management. New York: John Wiley.
87.
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., and J. van der Straaten, eds. 1994. The significance of sustainable development for ideas, tools, and policy. In Toward sustainable development. Washington, DC: Island Press.
