Despite the growing significance of smartness and inclusivity in urban development, the concept of a city that integrates both remains unclear. This study explores existing literature, clarifies underlying themes and proposes a conceptual framework for a smart-inclusive city. The scoping review identifies four key themes where the concepts intersect across social, political, spatial, and environmental domains. The framework positions inclusivity as the city's goal and smartness as the means, highlighting their complementarity, and suggests strategies based on two principles of citizen-centered processes and equitable benefit-sharing outcomes. This enhances our understanding and preparedness for achieving both agendas in a balanced manner.
AlbinoVitoBerardiUmbertoDangelicoRosa Maria. 2015. “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives.” Journal of Urban Technology22 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
2.
AlkhaldiAfnan N. 2022. “Digital Exclusion During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of How Developed Countries Responded to Support Their Citizens.” International Journal of Electronic Government Research18 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.306231.
AllamZaheerSharifiAyyoobBibriSimon EliasChabaudDidier. 2022. “Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Smart Urban Governance.” Sustainability14 (9): 5275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095275.
5.
AlsayelAbdulrhmande JongMartinFransenJan. 2022. “Can Creative Cities be Inclusive Too? How Do Dubai, Amsterdam and Toronto Navigate the Tensions Between Creativity and Inclusiveness in Their Adoption of City Brands and Policy Initiatives?” Cities128: 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103786.
6.
AnttiroikoAri-Veikkode JongMartin. 2020. The Inclusive City: The Theory and Practice of Creating Shared Urban Prosperity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
ArispeGuillermoAcitiClaudioPressoMatíasMaroneJosé. 2019. “Smart Assistance Spots for the Blind or Visually Impaired People.” Computer Science–CACIC2018: 277–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20787-8_20.
8.
ArkseyHilaryO'MalleyLisa. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology8 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
9.
Asian Development Bank. 2017. Enabling Inclusive Cities. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank.
10.
BernardinoSusanaFreitas SantosJ.. 2018. “Building Smarter Cities Through Social Entrepreneurship.” In E-Planning and Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 1273–308. Hershey: IGI Global.
11.
BlacuttAndrée-AnneRocheStéphane. 2020. “When Design Fiction Meets Geospatial Sciences to Create a More Inclusive Smart City.” Smart Cities3 (4): 1334–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3040064.
12.
BorkowskaKatarzynaOsborneMichael. 2018. “Locating the Fourth Helix: Rethinking the Role of Civil Society in Developing Smart Learning Cities.” International Review of Education64 (3): 355–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-018-9723-0.
CardulloPaoloKitchinRob. 2019. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space37 (5): 813–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508
15.
CarterDave. 2013. “Urban Regeneration, Digital Development Strategies and the Knowledge Economy: Manchester Case Study.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy4: 169–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0086-7.
16.
CastroGema Del RíoFernandezMaria Camino GonzalezColsaAngel Uruburu. 2021. “Unleashing the Convergence Amid Digitalization and Sustainability Towards Pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Holistic Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production280: 122204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204.
17.
ChangJi-inChoiJeongsunAnHyunjinChungHye-Young. 2022. “Gendering the Smart City: A Case Study of Sejong City, Korea.” Cities120: 103422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103422.
18.
ChenPengyuDagestaniAbd Alwahed. 2023. “Urban Planning Policy and Clean Energy Development Harmony-Evidence from Smart City Pilot Policy in China.” Renewable Energy210: 251–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.063.
19.
ChenTzuhaoRamon Gil-GarciaJ.Gasco-HernandezMila. 2022. “Understanding Social Sustainability for Smart Cities: The Importance of Inclusion, Equity, and Citizen Participation as Both Inputs and Long-Term Outcomes.” Journal of Smart Cities and Society1 (2): 135–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/SCS-210123.
20.
ChibArulAlvarezKatrinaTodorovicTatjana. 2022. “Critical Perspectives on the Smart City: Efficiency Objectives vs Inclusion Ideals.” Journal of Urban Technology29 (4): 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2021.2001712.
ClarinvalAntoineSimonofskiAnthonyHenryJulieVanderoseBenoîtDumasBruno. 2023. “Introducing the Smart City to Children: Lessons Learned from Hands-On Workshops in Classes.” Sustainability15 (3): 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031774.
23.
CorreiaDiogoFeioJoséTeixeiraLeonorMarquesJoão Lourenço. 2021. “The Inclusion of Citizens in Smart Cities Policymaking: The Potential Role of Development Studies’ Participatory Methodologies.” In Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions-9th International Conference. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77015-0_3.
24.
CorreiaDiogoMendesMiguelFeioJosé Eduardo Silva Abreu Lopes. 2020. “The Smart City as a Social Policy Actor.” In Proceedings of International Conferences ICT, Society, and Human Beings, 236–240.
25.
DameriRenata Paola. 2013. “Searching for Smart City Definition: A Comprehensive Proposal.” International Journal of Computers & Technology11 (5): 2544–51. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v11i5.1142.
26.
de Oliveira NetoJoão SoaresKofujiSergio Takeo. 2016. “Inclusive Smart City: An Exploratory Study.” In UAHCI 2016 Lecture Notes in Computer Science9738: 456–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40244-4_44.
27.
de Oliveira NetoJoão SoaresKofujiSergio TakeoBourdaYolaine. 2020. “People with Disabilities’ Needs in Urban Spaces as Challenges towards a More Inclusive Smart City.” In ICITS 2020 Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing1137: 285–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40690-5_28.
28.
EdgeSaraBolukKarlaGroulxMarkQuickMatthew. 2020. “Exploring Diverse Lived Experiences in the Smart City Through Creative Analytic Practice.” Cities96: 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102478.
29.
FarmerSarahBricoutJohn C.BakerPaul M.SolomonJeremy. 2022. “Personas, the Pandemic, and Inclusive, Synthetic, Smart City Planning.” International Journal of E-Planning Research11 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.299545.
30.
GiacobbeMaurizioPuliafitoCarloScarpaMarco. 2018. “The Big Bucket: An IOT Cloud Solution for Smart Waste Management in Smart Cities.” In ESOCC 2016 Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72125-5_4.
31.
GiffingerRudolfFertnerChristianKramarHansKalasekRobertPichler-MilanovicNatasaMeijersEvert J.. 2007. Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Final Report. Vienna, UT: Centre of Regional Science.
32.
GomesCristina AzevedoAraújoLiaFigueiredoMariaMoraisNidiaPereiraJoséRitoPedroFerreiraSónia, et al.2017. “VIAS | Viseu InterAge Stories: Developing an App to Foster Social Inclusion and Healthy Lifestyles.” In 2017 International Symposium on Computers in Education1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE.2017.8259663.
33.
González-BrionesAlfonsoGarcía-MagariñoIvánGómez-SanzJorge J.Fuentes-FernándezRubénPavónJuan. 2021. “A Collaborative Platform for the Detection of Non-inclusive Situations in Smart Cities.” In Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Artificial Intelligence206–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85713-4_20.
34.
GrahamStephen. 2002. “Bridging Urban Digital Divides? Urban Polarisation and Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs).” Urban Studies39 (1): 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220099050.
35.
Greater London Authority. 2018. Inclusive London: The Mayor’s Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Strategy. London: Greater London Authority.
36.
GrecoIlariaBencardinoMassimiliano. 2014. “The Paradigm of the Modern City: SMART and SENSEable Cities for Smart, Inclusive and Sustainable Growth.” In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2014, 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09129-7_42.
37.
HainounAliNeumannHans-MartinMorishita-SteffenNaomi, et al.2022. “Smarter Together: Monitoring and Evaluation of Integrated Building Solutions for Low-Energy Districts of Lighthouse Cities Lyon, Munich, and Vienna.” Energies15 (19): 6907. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196907.
38.
HarrisonKatherineBörüteceneAhmetLöwgrenJonasEnlundDesiréeRingdahlRasmusAngelakisVangelis. 2020. “Sustainability Means Inclusivity: Engaging Citizens in Early Stage Smart City Development" In IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, 413–6.
39.
HarrisonColinEckmanBarbaraHamiltonRickHartswickPerryKalagnanamJayantParaszczakJurijWilliamsPeter. 2010. “Foundations for Smarter Cities.” IBM Journal of Research and Development54 (4): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2010.2048257.
40.
HollandsR. G.2008. “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? Intelligent, Progressive or Entrepreneurial?” City12 (3): 303–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126.
41.
HollandsR. G.2015. “Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8 (1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011.
42.
JayashreePayyazhiHamzaFerasEl BarachiMayGholamiGhazaleh. 2019. “Inclusion as an Enabler to Sustainable Innovations in Smart Cities: A Multi-level Framework.” In 4th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech.2019.8783013.
43.
KarkiTej. 2022. “How Inclusive Are the Smart City Projects Implemented in India?” In Smart Cities and Smart Communities, edited by PatnaikS.SenS.GhoshS.. Vol. 294, 253–74. Singapore: Springer Nature.
KitchinRob. 2015. “Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8 (1): 131–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027.
46.
KummithaRama Krishna Reddy. 2019. “Smart Cities and Entrepreneurship: An Agenda for Future Research.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change149: 119763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119763.
47.
KummithaRama Krishna ReddyCrutzenNathalie. 2017. “How Do We Understand Smart Cities? An Evolutionary Perspective.” Cities67: 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010.
48.
LaenensWillemienMariënIlseWalravensNils. 2019. “Participatory Action Research for the Development of E-Inclusive Smart Cities.” Architecture and Culture7 (3): 457–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2019.1679447.
49.
LeeJuhyunBabcockJuliaPhamThai SonBuiThu HienKangMyounggu. 2023. “Smart City as a Social Transition Towards Inclusive Development Through Technology: A Tale of Four Smart Cities.” International Journal of Urban Sciences27: 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2074076.
50.
LeeJung-hyunNamJin. 2021. “Analysis of Regional Characteristics and Deficiency Areas of Smart City Living Service : Focused on the Seoul.” Journal of Korea Planning Association56 (5): 30–43. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2021.10.56.5.30.
51.
LeeJu HyunParkHan-naParkIn KwonSongJaeminLeeJae SeungKimJoon SikWangLujie, et al.2024. Monitoring Smart Inclusive Transitions for an Equitable Urban Future, Using Global Urban Monitoring Framework. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
52.
LeeJane YeonjaeWoodsOrlandoKongLily. 2020. “Towards More Inclusive Smart Cities: Reconciling the Divergent Realities of Data and Discourse at the Margins.” Geography Compass14 (9): e12504. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12504Kong.
53.
LemondeCarlosArsenioElisabeteHenriquesRui. 2021. “Integrative Analysis of Multimodal Traffic Data: Addressing Open Challenges Using Big Data Analytics in the City of Lisbon.” European Transport Research Review13: 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00520-3.
54.
LewandowskaAgataChodkowska-MiszczukJustyna. 2022. “The Role of Participation in the Development of the Smart City Idea: Frameworks, Opportunities, Mechanisms.” Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series57: 93–111. https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0025.
55.
LiManlinWoolrychRyan. 2021. “Experiences of Older People and Social Inclusion in Relation to Smart “Age-Friendly” Cities: A Case Study of Chongqing, China.” Frontiers in Public Health9: 779913. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.779913.
56.
LiangDannide JongMartinSchravenDaanWangLili. 2022. “Mapping Key Features and Dimensions of the Inclusive City: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Study.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology29 (1): 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1911873.
57.
LimHwajinRyuHyunyoungLeeJungchan. 2020. “A Comparative Study of Smart City Projects and Strategies in Korea and Japan.” Journal of Korea Planning Association55 (2): 143–155. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2020.04.55.2.143.
58.
LockwoodFreyja. 2020. “Bristol's Smart City Agenda: Vision, Strategy, Challenges and Implementation.” IET Smart Cities2 (4): 208–14. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smc.2020.0063.
59.
MaRuiquLamP. T. I.. 2019. “More Inclusive Approaches to Smart Cities: No One is Left Behind.” In Proceeding of 22nd International Conference on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate.
60.
MaalsenSophiaWolifsonPetaDowlingRobyn. 2023. “Gender in the Australian Innovation Ecosystem: Planning Smart Cities for Men.” Gender, Place & Culture30 (2): 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2053068.
61.
MalekJalaluddin AbdulLimSeng BoonYigitcanlarTan. 2021. “Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review.” Sustainability13 (1): 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010376.
62.
MalhotraCharruManchandaVintiBhilwarAnushkaBasuAniket. 2021. “Designing Inclusive Smart Cities of the Future: The Indian Context.” In Solving Urban Infrastructure Problems Using Smart City Technologies, 631–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816816-5.00029-2.
63.
MunnZacharyPetersMicah D.SternCindyTufanaruCatalinMcArthurAlexaAromatarisEdoardo. 2018. “Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors When Choosing Between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology18: 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
64.
NamTaewooPardoTheresa A.. 2011. “Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.” In 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602.
65.
NeirottiPaoloDe MarcoAlbertoCaglianoAnna CorinnaManganoGiulioScorranoFrancesco. 2014. “Current Trends in Smart City Initiatives: Some Stylised Facts.” Cities38: 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010.
66.
NestiGiorgia. 2019. “Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Smart Cities: Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Challenges.” Information Polity24 (3): 289–304. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190134.
67.
NguyenHuong ThuMarquesPilarBenneworthPaul. 2022. “Living Labs: Challenging and Changing the Smart City Power Relations?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change183: 121866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121866.
68.
Padrón NápolesVíctor ManuelPáezDiego GachetPenelasJosé Luis EstebanPérezOlalla GarcíaSantacruzMaría José Garcíade PablosFernando Martín. 2020. “Smart Bus Stops as Interconnected Public Spaces for Increasing Social Inclusiveness and Quality of Life of Elder Users.” Smart Cities3 (2): 430–43. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3020023.
ParkIn KwonLeeMinju. 2016. “Development of the Construct of Urban Inclusivity and its Indicators System: For the Inclusive City Agenda in Korea.” Space and Environment26 (4): 109–58. https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2016.26.4.109.
71.
Pérez-delHoyoRaquelAndújar-MontoyaMaria DoloresMoraHiginioGilart-IglesiasVirgilio. 2018a. “Citizen Participation in Urban Planning-Management Processes.” In 7th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, 206–13. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006704202060213.
72.
Pérez-delHoyoRaquelAndújar-MontoyaMaria DoloresMoraHiginioIglesiasGilart-VirgilioMollá-SirventRafael Alejandro. 2021. “Participatory Management to Improve Accessibility in Consolidated Urban Environments.” Sustainability13 (15): 8323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158323.
73.
Pérez-delHoyoRaquelGarcía-MayorClaraMoraHiginioGilart-IglesiasVirgilioAndújar-MontoyaMaria Dolores. 2017. “Improving Urban Accessibility: A Methodology for Urban Dynamics Analysis in Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Cities.” Urban Regeneration & Sustainability12 (3): 357–67. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-357-367
74.
Pérez-delHoyoRaquelMoraHiginioParedesJosé Francisco. 2018b. “Using Social Network Data to Improve Planning and Design of Smart Cities.” WIT Transactions on the Built Environment179: 171–8. https://doi.org/10.2495/UG180161.
75.
PraharajSarbeswar. 2021. “Area-Based Urban Renewal Approach for Smart Cities Development in India: Challenges of Inclusion and Sustainability.” Urban Planning6 (4): 202–15. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4484.
76.
QiuDongLvBinglinChanCalvin M.HuangYuesenSiKai. 2023. “How Does a Smart City Bridge Diversify Urban Development Trends? A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Study.” Sustainability15 (5): 4455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054455wang.
77.
RamirezAlejandro RGarcíaIsrael González-CarrascoJasperGustavo HenriqueLopezAmarilys LimaLopez-CuadradoJose LuisGarcía-CrespoAngel. 2017. “Towards Human Smart Cities: Internet of Things for Sensory Impaired Individuals.” Computing99: 107–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-016-0529-2.
78.
RebernikNatašaSzajczykMarekBahilloAlfonsoGoličnik MarušićBarbara. 2020. “Measuring Disability Inclusion Performance in Cities Using Disability Inclusion Evaluation Tool (DIETool).” Sustainability12 (4): 1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041378.
79.
SadowskiJathanBendorRoy. 2019. “Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary.” Science, Technology, & Human Values44 (3): 540–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918806061.
80.
SarmaSumitaSunnySanwar A.. 2017. “Civic Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Smart City Emergence in Kansas City.” Business Horizons60 (6): 843–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.010.
81.
SharmaRaviFantinArul-RajPrabhuNavinGuanChongDattakumarAmbica. 2016. “Digital Literacy and Knowledge Societies: A Grounded Theory Investigation of Sustainable Development.” Telecommunications Policy40 (7): 628–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.05.003.
82.
SharmaSomeshGianoliAlbertoGeerlingsHarry. 2021. “Governance of Ambient Assisted Living for Age Friendly Inclusive Cities." In Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications III. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 612–7. Charm: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55307-4_93
83.
SidaniDinaVegliantiEleonoraMaroufkhaniParisa. 2022. “Smart Cities for a Sustainable Social Inclusion Strategy – A Comparative Study Between Italy and Malaysia.” Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems14 (2): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.17705/1pais.14203.
84.
SkillKarinWihlborgElinKaharevicAhmed. 2020. “Digital Diversity and an Inclusive Smart Society: A Novel Methodological Search for Digital Participation and Sustainable Development in a Swedish Suburb.” In International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 843–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428636.
85.
SourbatiMaria. 2020. “Age and the City: The Case of Smart Mobility.” In Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technology and Society: 6th International Conference, 312–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_22
86.
SugandhaRobert FreestoneFavaroPaola. 2022. “The Social Sustainability of Smart Cities: A Conceptual Framework.” City, Culture and Society29: 100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100460.
87.
SzaszákGabriellaKecskésTibor. 2020. “Universal Open Space Design to Inform Digital Technologies for a Disability-Inclusive Place-Making on the Example of Hungary.” Smart Cities3 (4): 1293–333. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3040063.
88.
UN-Habitat. 2002. The Global Campaign on Urban Governance: Concept Paper. 2nd ed. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
89.
UN-Habitat. 2017a. The New Urban Agenda. New York: United Nations.
90.
UN-Habitat. 2017b. Habitat III Issue Papers. New York: United Nations.
91.
United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.
92.
van GilsBart A.BaileyAjay. 2023. “Revisiting Inclusion in Smart Cities: Infrastructural Hybridization and the Institutionalization of Citizen Participation in Bengaluru’s Peripheries.” International Journal of Urban Sciences27: 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1938640.
93.
van LeeuwenCoraClavijoJuanita DevisMariënIlseJacobsAn. 2022. “Invisible in the Smart City: Using Participatory Design Methods for Age-Friendly Solutions.” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities4: 956787. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.956787.
Vargas-AcostaRaul AlejandroBecerraDiana LauraGurbuzOkanVillanueva-RosalesNataliaNunez-MchiriGuillerminaCheuRuey Long. 2019. “Smart Mobility for Seniors through the Urban Connector.” In 2019 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference, 241–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC246665.2019.9071732.
97.
WaghmareMadhurimaSinghalShaleen. 2022. “Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Inclusive Smart Cities in India.” Development in Practice32 (2): 144–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2021.1907535.
98.
WangChihuangjiSteinfeldEdwardMaiselJordana L.KangBumjoon. 2021. “Is Your Smart City Inclusive? Evaluating Proposals from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Smart City Challenge.” Sustainable Cities and Society74: 103148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103148.
99.
WangChihuangjiYinFuzhenZhaoYixuanYinLi. 2023. “Making Transportation Systems in U.S. Cities Smarter and More Inclusive: A Synthesis of Challenges and Evaluation of Strategies.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information12 (2): 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12020072.
100.
WashburnDougSindhuUsmanBalaourasStephanieDinesRachel A.HayesNicholasNelsonLauren E.. 2010. Helping CIOs Understand “Smart City” Initiatives: Defining the Smart City, its Drivers, and the Role of the CIO. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research, Inc.
101.
WillisKatharine S. 2019. “Whose Right to the Smart City?” In The Right to the Smart City, edited by CardulloPaoloDi FeliciantonioCesareKitchinRob, 27–41. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
102.
World Bank. 2015. World Inclusive Cities Approach Paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
103.
ZhaoRunde JongMartinEdelenbosJurian. 2023. “Will the True Inclusive City Rise? Mapping the Strengths and Weaknesses of the City Ranking Systems.” Cities143: 104617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104617.
