This article explores reflexivity and critical reflection as they were applied during an exploratory study of the psychiatric and mental health service experiences of lesbian and queer women. Reflexivity and critical reflection are centered as critical research practices toward recognizing and responding to micropractices of power and power relations in the interviewing relationship, structural forms of power and its impact on the recruitment of participants and therefore the inclusion and exclusion of particular participants in the research process, and the limitations of the social process of knowledge production vis-a-vis research methods and interviews.
Aléx, L., & Hammarström, A. (2008). Shift in power during an interview situation: Methodological reflections inspired by Foucault and Bourdieu. Nursing Inquiry, 15, 169-176.
2.
Ali, S. ( 2006). Racializing research: Managing power and politics? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29, 471-486.
3.
Allan, J., Pease, B., & Briskman, L. ( 2003). Critical social work: An introduction to theories and practice. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
4.
Brown, M.P. ( 2000). Closet space: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe. NYRoutledge.
5.
Butler, R., & Parr, H. ( 1999). New geographies of illness, impairment and disability . In R. Butler & H. Parr (Eds.), Mind and body spaces: Geographies of illness, impairment and disability (pp. 1-24). London : Routledge.
6.
Campbell, K. ( 2004). The promise of feminist reflexivities: Developing Donna Haraway’s project for feminist science studies. Hypatia , 19, 162-182.
7.
Charmaz, K. ( 1995). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27-49). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
Charmaz, K. ( 2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
Cosgrove, L., & McHugh, M.C. (2000). Speaking for ourselves: Feminist methods and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 815-837.
10.
Daley, A. (Unpublished). A bodily presence of mind: Theorizing the invisibility of lesbian women with SMI in psychiatric and mental health services. (Comprehensive paper completed in partial fulfillment of doctoral studies, Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada).
11.
D’Cruz, H. ( 2000). Social work research as knowledge/power in practice. Sociological Research Online, 5. Retrieved May 2007, from, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/1/dcruz.html
12.
D’Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. ( 2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 73-90.
13.
Del Busso, L. ( 2007). Embodying feminist politics in the research interview: Material bodies and reflexivity. Feminism & Psychology , 17, 309-315.
14.
Dominelli, L. ( 2002). Anti-oppressive practice in context. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues, and critical debates (2nd ed., pp. 3-19). Houndmills, Basinstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
Dozier, R. ( 2005). Beards, breasts, and bodies: Doing sex in a gendered world. Gender & Society, 19, 297-316.
16.
Fanow, M.M., & Cook, J. ( 1991). Back to the future: A look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology. In M. M. Fanow & J. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 1-15). Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
17.
Foucault, M. ( 1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings , 1972-1977 (pp. 78-108). NY: Pantheon Books.
18.
Gilgun, J.F. ( 2008). Lived experience, reflexivity and research on perpetrators of interpersonal violence. Qualitative Social Work, 7, 181-197.
19.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
20.
Golombisky, K. ( 2006). Gendering the interview: Feminist reflections on gender as performance in research. Women’s Studies in Communication , 29, 165-192.
21.
Gray, B. ( 2008). Putting emotion and reflexivity to work in researching migration. Sociology, 42, 935-952.
22.
Halton, C., Murphy, M., & Dempsey, M. ( 2007). Reflective learning in social work education: Researching student experiences. Reflective Practice, 8, 511-523.
23.
Haraway, D. ( 1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. NYRoutledge.
24.
Harding, S. ( 1996). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘‘strong objectivity’’? In E. Fox Keller & H. E. Longino (Eds.), Feminism and science (pp. 238-248). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25.
Harding, S., & Norberg, K. ( 2005). New feminist approaches to social sciences methodologies: An introduction. Signs, 30, 2009-2015.
26.
Heron, B. ( 2005). Self-reflection in critical social work practice: Subjectivity and the possibilities of resistance. Reflective Practice, 6, 341-351.
27.
Mandell, D. ( 2008). Power, care and vulnerability: Considering use of self in child welfare work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 22, 235-248.
28.
Mauthner, M. ( 2000). Snippets and silences: Ethics and reflexivity in narratives of sistering. International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 3, 287-306.
29.
Maynard, M. ( 1992). Methods, practice, and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research. In M. Maynard & J. Purvis (Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 10-26). London: Taylor & Francis.
30.
Oakley, A. ( 1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing Feminist Research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge .
31.
O’Toole, C.J. ( 2000). The view from below: Developing a knowledge base about an unknown population. Sexuality and Disability, 18, 207-224.
32.
Probyn, E. ( 1995). Lesbians in space: Gender, sex, and the structure of missing. Gender, Place & Culture, 2, 77-84.
33.
Reed, K. ( 2000). Dealing with differences: Researching health beliefs and behaviours of British Asian mothers. Sociological Research Online, 4. Retrieved June 12, 2007 , from http://socresonline.org.uk/4/4/reed.html
34.
Rossiter, A. ( 2001). Innocence lost and suspicion found: Do we educate for or against social work?Critical Social Work, 2. Retrieved November 26, 2008, from www.criticalsocialwork.com
35.
Ryan, L., & Golden, A. ( 2006). ‘‘Tick the box please’’: A reflexive approach to doing quantitative social research. Sociology , 40, 1191-1200.
36.
Sakamoto, I., & Pitner, R. ( 2005). Use of critical consciousness in anti-oppressive social work practice: Disentangling power dynamics at personal and structural levels . British Journal of Social Work, 35, 435-452.
37.
Sampson, H., Bloor, M., & Fincham, B. ( 2008). A price worth paying? Considering the ‘‘cost’’ of reflexive research methods and the influence of feminist ways of ‘‘doing .’’. Sociology, 42, 919-933.
38.
Schön, D. ( 1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books .
39.
Schön, D. ( 1987). Donald Schön’s presentation ‘‘Educating the Reflective Practitioner’’ to the 1987 meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. Retrieved February 13, 2008, from http://educ.queensu.ca/∼ar/schon87.thm
40.
Skeggs, B. ( 1999). Matter out of place: Visibility and sexualities in leisure spaces. Leisure Studies, 18, 213-232.
41.
Skeggs, B. ( 2001). The toilet paper: Femininity, class and mis-recognition . Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 295-307.
42.
Speer, S.A. ( 2002). What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice. Discourse & Society, 13, 783-803.
43.
Suki, A. ( 2006). Racializing research: Managing power and politics? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29, 471-486.
44.
Tang, N. ( 2002). Interviewer and interviewee relationships between women . Sociology, 36, 703-721.
45.
Weedon, C. ( 1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
46.
Wheatley, E.E. ( 2005). Risk, reflexivity and an elusory body. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34, 68-100.
