With the transformation of intimate violence from private trouble to social problem, police intervention in domestic violence cases became more prevalent. Research has focused mainly on battered women’s perception of police intervention, their evaluations, and their level of satisfaction with the intervention. However, there is little research examining the perpetrators’ subjective perceptions of such interventions. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze battering men’s perceptions of police intervention. The study is based on semistructured, in-depth interviews with 20 batterers who had repeated encounters with police. Findings show a continuum of self-management, ranging from attempts to preserve a normative identity in the first encounter to struggling against criminalization in the second encounter and adopting a victim identity in the third encounter. The findings are discussed in the context of gender identity and power relations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 378-395.
2.
Avakame, E. F., & Fyfe, J. J. (2001). Differential police treatment of male-on-female spousal violence: Additional evidence on the leniency thesis. Violence Against Women, 7, 22-45.
3.
Bograd, M. (1988). How battered women and abusive men account for domestic violence: Excuses, justifications, or explanations? In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Coping with family violence: Research & policy perspectives (pp. 60-77). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Bowker, L. H. (1983). Beating wife-beating. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
5.
Brooks, G. R. (1998). A new psychotherapy for traditional men. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Buttell, F. P. (1999). Moral development among court-ordered domestic violence offenders: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 26(2), 37-52.
7.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1993). The scientific evidence is not conclusive: Arrest is no panacea. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 337-356). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Carlson, B. E. (1984). Causes and maintenance of domestic violence: An ecological analysis. Social Service Review, 58, 569-587.
10.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongfive traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
13.
Dutton, D. G. (1986). Wife assaulters’ explanations for assault: The neutralization of self-punishment. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 381-390.
14.
Edleson, J., & Tolman, R. (1992). Intervention for men who batter: An ecological approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Eisikovits, Z., & Buchbinder, E. (1997). Talking violent: A phenomenological study of metaphors battering men use. Violence Against Women, 3, 482-498.
16.
Eisikovits, Z., & Buchbinder, E. (2000). Locked in a violent embrace: Understanding and intervening in domestic violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Eisikovits, Z., Goldblatt, H., & Winstok, Z. (1999). Partner accounts of intimate violence: Towards a theoretical model. Families in Society, 80, 606-619.
18.
Garner, J. H., & Maxwell, C. D. (2000). What are the lessons of the police arrest studies? Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 4, 83-114.
19.
Gelles, R. J. (1993). Constraints against family violence: How well do they work? American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 575-586.
20.
Gondolf, E. W. (2000). Human subject issues in battering program evaluation. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 4, 273-297.
21.
Gondolf, E. W., & Hanneken, J. (1987). The gender warrior: Reformed batterers on abuse, treatment, and change. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 177-191.
22.
Gordon, J. S. (1996). Community services for abused women: A review of perceived usefulness and efficacy. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 315-329.
23.
Hamberger, L. K., & Potente, T. (1994). Counseling heterosexual women arrested for domestic violence: Implications for theory and practice. Violence and Victims, 9, 125-137.
24.
Hamilton, B., & Coates, J. (1993). Perceived helpfulness and the use of professional services by abused women. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 313-324.
25.
Hammersley, M. (1995). Theory and evidence in qualitative research. Quality and Quantity, 29, 55-66.
26.
Harway, M., & Evans, K. (1999). Working in groups with men who batter. In M. P. Andronico (Ed.), Men in groups: Insights, interventions, and psychoeducational work (pp. 357-375). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. London: Sage.
28.
Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262-290.
29.
Hewstone, M. (1989). Casual attribution from cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
30.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Hutchison, G. (1993). Attributing negative intent to wife behavior: The attribution of maritally violent versus non-violent men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,102, 206-211.
31.
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). Atale of two theories: Acritical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255-269.
32.
Hoyle, C. (1998). Negotiating domestic violence: Police, criminal justice and victims. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
33.
Hoyte, C., & Sanders, A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment? British Journal of Criminology, 40, 14-36.
34.
Hutchison, I. W., Hirschel, J. D., & Pesackis, C. E. (1994). Family violence and police utilization. Violence and Victims, 9, 299-313.
35.
Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1998). When men batter women: New insights into ending abusive relationships. New York: Simon & Schuster.
36.
Jaffe, P. G., Hastings, E., Reitzel, D., & Austin, G. W. (1993). The impact of police lying charges. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation (pp. 62-95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Kvale, S. (1994). Ten standard objections to qualitative research interviews. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25, 147-173.
38.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
Marris, P. (1974). Loss and change. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
40.
Martin, M. E. (1997). Double your trouble: Duel arrests in the family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
41.
Monson, T. C. (1983). Implications of the traits vs. situations controversy for differences in the attributions of actors and observers. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental and social dimensions (pp. 293-314). London: Academic Press.
42.
Moore, T. M., Eisler, R. M., & Franchina, J. J. (2000). Casual attributions and affective responses to provocative female partner behavior by abusive and nonabusive males. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 69-80.
43.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
Polkinghorne, D. (1991). Narrative and self-concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(2-3), 135-153.
45.
Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 133-157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Reitz, R. R. (1999). Batterers’experiences of being violent: Aphenomenological study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 143-165.
47.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48.
Sartre, J. P. (1956). Being and nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.
49.
Saunders, D. G., & Size, P. B. (1986). Attitudes about woman abuse among police officers, victims, and victim advocates. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 25-42.
50.
Schmidt, J. D., & Sherman, L. W. (1993). Does arrest deter domestic violence? American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 601-609.
51.
Schofield, J. W. (1993). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice (pp. 200-225). London: Sage.
52.
Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrests for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
53.
Shoham, E. (2000). The battered wife’s perception of the characteristics of her encounter with the police. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 242-257.
54.
Smith, L. J. F. (1989). Domestic violence: An overview of the literature. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
55.
Stamp, G. H., & Sabourin, T. C. (1995). Accounting for violence: An analysis of male spousal abuse narratives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 284-307.
56.
Stark, E. (1993). Mandatory arrest of batterers: Areply to its critics. American Behavioral Scientist,36, 651-680.
57.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and the future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284-297.
59.
Tolman, R. M., & Weisz, A. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 481-495.
60.
Tonizzo, S., Howells, K., Day, A., Reidpath, D., & Froyland, I. (2000). Attributions of negative partner behavior by men who physically abuse their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 155-167.
61.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
62.
Weiner, B. (1990). Searching for the roots of applied attribution theory. In S. Graham & V. S. Folkes (Eds.), Attribution theory: Applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict (pp. 1-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
Yllo, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
