This study focuses on the relationship between an individual’s dissatisfaction with the level of power they have in their dating relationships, parental violence they experienced during their childhoods, and their dating violence perpetration. A sample of 352 male and 296 female undergraduate college students completed a dating violence survey, including selected subscales from the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) and the Relationship Power Scale. Findings show that relationship power dissatisfaction is associated with the use of violence in dating relationships for both men and women. However, parental violence emerged as an even stronger predictor of dating violence perpetration. Findings also indicate that male perpetration of dating violence is related to mother’s violence, whereas female perpetration of dating violence is related to father’s violence. The results indicate the importance of including gender in the study of dating violence perpetration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P. C., Moore, S., & Alexander, E. R., III. (1991). What is transmitted in the intergenerational transmission of violence? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 657-668 .
2.
Bernard, M. L., & Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: The family as a model for love relationships . Family Relations, 32, 283-286 .
3.
Bethke, T. M., & DeJoy, D. M. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 36-51 .
4.
Bowman, R. L., & Morgan, H. M. (1998). A comparison of rates of verbal and physical abuse on campus by gender and sexual orientation . College Student Journal, 32, 43-52 .
5.
Cantrell, P. J., MacIntyre, D. I., Sharkey, K. J., & Thompson, V. (1995). Violence in the marital dyad as a predictor of violence in the peer relationships of older adolescents/young adults . Violence and Victims, 10, 35-41 .
6.
Carlson, B. E. (1996). Dating violence: Student beliefs about consequences . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 3-18 .
7.
Coleman, K. H., & Straus, M. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples . Violence and Victims, 1, 141-157 .
8.
Doumas, D., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (1994). The intergenerational transmission of aggression across three generations . Journal of Family Violence, 9, 157-175 .
9.
Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2000). The control motive in intimate partner violence . Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 86-94 .
10.
Follingstad, D. R., Bradley, R. G., Laughlin, J. E., & Burke, L. (1999). Risk factors and correlates of dating violence: The relevance of examining frequency and severity levels in a college sample . Violence and Victims, 14, 365-380 .
11.
Foo, L., & Margolin, G. (1995). A multivariate investigation of dating aggression . Journal of Family Violence, 10, 351-377 .
12.
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., & Linder, G. F. (1999). Family violence and the perpetration of adolescent dating violence: Examining social learning and social control processes . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 331-342 .
13.
Frieze, I. H., & McHugh, M. C. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 449-465 .
14.
Gray, H. M., & Foshee, V. (1997). Adolescent dating violence: Differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 126-141 .
15.
Handwerker, W. P. (1998). Why violence? A test of hypotheses representing three discourses on the roots of domestic violence . Human Organization, 57, 200-208 .
16.
Harned, M. S. (2001). Abused women or abused men? An examination of the context and outcomes of dating violence . Violence and Victims, 16, 269-285 .
17.
Jankowski, M. K., Leitenberg, H., Henning, K., & Coffey, P. (1999). Intergenerational transmission of dating aggression as a function of witnessing only same sex parents vs. opposite sex parents vs. parents as perpetrators of domestic violence . Journal of Family Violence, 14, 267-279 .
18.
Jouriles, E. N., & Norwood, W. D. (1995). Physical aggression toward boys and girls in families characterized by the battering of women . Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 69-78 .
19.
Knutson, J. F., & Mehm, J. G. (1988). Transgenerational patterns of coercion in families and intimate relationships. In G. W. Russell (Ed.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 67-89). New York: Packard-Macmillan .
20.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Neidig, P., & Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence in past abuse . Journal of Family Violence, 10, 159-175 .
21.
Levy, B. (1990). Abusive teen dating relationships: An emerging issue for the 90’s . Response, 13, 5-6 .
22.
Margolin, L. (1992). Beyond maternal blame: Physical child abuse as a phenomenon of gender . Journal of Family Issues, 13, 410-423 .
23.
Markowitz, F. E. (2001). Attitudes and family violence: Linking intergenerational and cultural theories . Journal of Family Violence, 16, 205-218 .
24.
Neufeld, J., McNamara, J. R., & Ertl, M. (1999). Incidence and prevalence of dating partner abuse and its relationship to dating practices . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 125-137 .
25.
O’Hearn, H. G., & Margolin, G. (2000). Men’s attitudes condoning marital aggression: A moderator between family of origin abuse and aggression against female partners . Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 159-174 .
26.
O’Keefe, M. (1998). Factors mediating the link between witnessing interparental violence and dating violence . Journal of Family Violence, 13, 39-57 .
27.
Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S. L., & Dejong, W. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research . Sex Roles, 42, 637-660 .
28.
Riggs, D. S., & O’Leary, K. D. (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners: An examination of a causal model of courtship aggression . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 519-540 .
29.
Ronfeldt, H. M., Kimerling, R., & Arias, I. (1998). Satisfaction with relationship power and the perpetration of dating violence . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 70-78 .
30.
Rosen, K. H., Bartle-Haring, S., & Stith, S. M. (2001). Using Bowen theory to enhance understanding of the intergenerational transmission of dating violence . Journal of Family Issues, 22, 124-142 .
31.
Schwartz, M., O’Leary, S. G., & Kendziora, K. T. (1997). Dating aggression among high school students . Violence and Victims, 12, 295-305 .
32.
Shook, N. J., Gerrity, D. A., Jurich, J., & Segrist, A. E. (2000). Courtship violence among college students: A comparison of verbally and physically abusive couples . Journal of Family Violence, 15, 1-22 .
33.
Straus, M. A. (1980). The marriage license as a hitting license: Evidence from popular culture, law, and social science. In M. A. Straus & G. T. Hotaling (Eds.), The social causes of husband-wife violence (pp. 39-50). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
34.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data . Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316 .
35.
Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Wekerle, C., & Pittman, A. (2001). Child maltreatment: Risk of adjustment problems and dating violence in adolescence . Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 282-289 .
