The Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) is a 72-item self-report measure designed to predict violent and nonviolent recidivism among adult criminal offenders. The results from using samples from Australia, Canada, England, Singapore, and two samples from the United States (North Carolina and Pennsylvania) indicated that (a) the SAQ has sound psychometric properties, with acceptable reliability and concurrent validity for assessing recidivism and institutional adjustment; (b) there were nosignificant differences among the scores of the White, African American, Hispanic, and Aboriginal Australian offenders on the SAQ; (c) there were no significant differences among offenders who completed the SAQ for research purposes versus offenders who completed it as part of a decision-making process. Results provided support for the validity of the SAQ to be used with the culturally diverse offenders involved in this research and provided further evidence that contradicts concerns that the SAQ as a self-report measure may be susceptible to lying, and self-presentation biases.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
2.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
Andrews, D. A., Kiessling, J. J., Mickus, S. G., & Robinson, D. (1986). The Level of Supervision Inventory: Second report. Toronto: Ministry of Correctional Service of Ontario.
5.
Andrews, D. A., & Wormith, J. S. (1989). Personality and crime: Knowledge destruction and construction in criminology. Justice Quarterly, 6, 289-309.
6.
Bonta, J. (1997). Predicting adult offender recidivism. Research Summary, 2. Corrections Research and Development, Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada.
7.
Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L. L. (1987). The diversion of incarcerated offenders to correctional halfway houses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 302-323.
8.
Cooke, D. J., Kosson, D. S., & Michie, C. (2001). Psychopathy and ethnicity: Structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African participants. Psychological Assessment, 13, 531-542.
9.
Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1999). Psychopathy across cultures: North America and Scotland compared. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 58-68.
10.
Farrington, D. P. (1983). Offending from 10 to 25 years of age. In K. T. Van Dusen & S. A. Mendick (Eds.), Prospective studies of crime and delinquency (pp. 17-37). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
11.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 401-433.
12.
Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of the procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7-16.
13.
Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
14.
Hare, R. D. (1998). The Hare PCL-R: Some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal and Criminal Psychology, 3, 99-119.
15.
Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Factor structure of the Psychopathy Checklist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 741-747.
16.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
17.
Kendall, P. C., & Norton-Ford, J. D. (1982). Clinical psychology: Scientific and professional dimensions. New York: John Wiley.
18.
Kroner, D., & Loza, W. (2001). Evidence for the efficacy of self-report in predicting violent and nonviolent criminal recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 168-177.
19.
Kuriychuk, M. (1990). The assessment of psychopathy and risk-taking behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
20.
Lightfoot, L., & Hodgins, D. (1988). A survey of alcohol and drug problems in incarcerated offenders. International Journal of Addiction, 23, 687-706.
21.
Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 68-99.
22.
Loza, W. (1993). Different substance abusing offenders require a unique program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 37, 351-358.
23.
Loza, W. (1996). Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): A measure for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. Unpublished manuscript.
24.
Loza, W. (Submitted 2001). The myth of deception and lying on self-report measures predicting offenders recidivism: Example from the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ). Manuscript submitted for publication.
25.
Loza, W., & Dhaliwal, G. (1997).Psychometric evaluation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG): A measure for assessing violent recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 779-793.
26.
Loza, W., Dhaliwal, G., Kroner, D., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2000). Reliability, construct, and concurrent validities of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A measure for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 356-374.
27.
Loza, W., & Green, K. (2003). The Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A self-report measure for predicting recidivism versus clinician-administered measures. A five-year follow-up study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 781-797.
28.
Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (1999a).Anger and prediction of violent and nonviolent offender’s recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1014-1029.
29.
Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (1999b). The fallacy of reducing rape and violent recidivism by treating anger. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(4), 492-502.
30.
Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2000). Predictive validity of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): A measure for assessing violent and nonviolent release failures. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1183-1191.
31.
Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2001). The effectiveness of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) in predicting offenders’ postrelease outcome: A comparison study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 105-121.
32.
Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2002). The effectiveness of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) as anoffender’s classification measure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 3-13.
33.
Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2003). More evidence for the validity of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) for predicting violent and nonviolent recidivism: A five-year follow-up study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 709-721.
34.
Loza, W., & Simourd, D. J. (1994). Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI) among male Canadian federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 468-480.
35.
Lynn, R. (2002).Racial and ethnic differences in psycho-pathic personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 273-316.
36.
Mills, J. F., Loza, W., & Kroner, D. G. (2003). Predictive validity despite social desirability: Evidence for the robustness of self-report among offenders. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 13, 140-150.
37.
Motiuk, L. L., Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (1986).Classification in correctional half way houses: The relative and incremental predictive criterion validities of the Megargee-MMPI and LSI systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 33-46.
38.
Motiuk, M., Motiuk, L., & Bonta, J. (1992). A comparison between self-report and interviewbased inventories in offender classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 143-159.
39.
Nuffield, J. (1982). Parole decision-making in Canada: Research toward decision guidelines. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.
40.
Paulhus, D. L. (1994). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Reference manual for the BIDR version 6. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
41.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Methodological development, violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
42.
Serin, R. C., Peters, R. D., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). Predictors of psychopathy and release outcome in a criminal population. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 419-422.
43.
Stevenson, H. E., & Wormith, J. S. (1987). Psychopathy and the Level of Supervision Inventory. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.
44.
Villeneuve, D. B., Oliver, N., & Loza, W. (2003). Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire with a maximum security psychiatric population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1325-1334.
45.
Villeneuve, D. B., & Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Predictors of general and violent recidivism among mentally disordered inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 397-410.
46.
Wong, S. (1985). Criminal and institutional behaviors of psychopaths. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.
47.
Zinger, I., & Forth, A. (1998). Psychopathy and Canadian criminal proceedings: The potential for human right abuses. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 40 (July), 237-276.
