This descriptive study seeks to understand what first and second generation Portuguese women believe about wife abuse and what actions they believe are appropriate for an abused wife. Eighty first generation and 54 second generation women participated. The researcher read the questionnaire items aloud in one-on-one meetings. Overall, participants defined wife abuse broadly, did not approve of wife abuse, were most likely to believe that women should seek external help, and did not hold strong patriarchal beliefs. However, a number of generational differences were found. Second generation women were more likely to label an abusive behavior as abuse, and first generation women were more likely to approve of abuse, endorse indirect or traditional options to deal with wife abuse, and hold stronger patriarchal beliefs. The study’s implications for research and practice within Portuguese communities are discussed.
Allensworth, E. (1997). Earning mobility of first and ‘1.5’ generation Mexican-origin women and men: A comparison with U.S.-born Mexican American and non-Hispanic Whites. International Migration Review, 31, 386-410.
2.
Anderson, G., & Davis, J. C. (1990). Portuguese immigrant women in Canada. In D. Higgs (Ed.), Portuguese migration in global perspective (pp. 136-144). Toronto, Canada: Multicultural History Society of Ontario.
3.
Anderson, G., & Higgs, D. (1976). A future to inherit: Portuguese communities in Canada. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Publishers.
4.
Araujo, Z. A. (1996). Portuguese families. In M. McGoldrick, J. Giordano, & J. K. Pearce (Eds.), Ethnicity and family therapy (2nd ed., pp. 583-594). New York: Guilford.
5.
Arruda, A. (1993). Expanding the view: Growing up in Portuguese-Canadian families 1962-1980. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 25, 8-25.
6.
Bauer, H. M., Rodriguez, M. A., Quiroga, S. S., & Flores-Ortiz, Y. G. (2000). Barriers to health care for abused Latina and Asian immigrant women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 11, 33-44.
7.
Bui, H., & Morash, M. (1999). Domestic violence in the Vietnamese immigrant community. Violence Against Women, 5, 769-795.
8.
Chancer, L. S. (1987). New Bedford, Massachusetts, March 6, 1983 - March 22, 1984: The “before and after” of a group rape. Gender and Society, 1, 239-261.
9.
Dutton, M. A., Orloff, L. H., & Hass, G. A. (2000). Characteristics of help-seeking behaviors, resources and service needs of battered immigrant Latinas: Legal and policy implications. Georgetown Journal on Poverty and Law and Policy, 7, 245-305.
10.
Engerman, S. L., & Cesar das Neves, J. (1997). The bricks of an empire 1415-1999: 585 years of Portuguese emigration. Journal of European Economic History, 26, 471-510.
11.
Fortune, M. M. (2003). Faith based communities. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://endabuse.org/bpi/discussion1/V.pdf
12.
Giles, W. (1997). Re/membering the Portuguese household in Toronto: Culture, contradictions and resistance. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 387-396.
13.
Grams, A. C., Carneiro de Sousa, M. J., Roesch, R., & Pinto de Costa, J. (1997). Sexual abuse within the marital relationship. Medicine and Law, 16, 743-751.
14.
Grosner, L. (1995). A Canadian profile: Toronto’s Portuguese and Brazilian communities. Toronto, Canada: Portuguese Interagency Network.
15.
Grossi, P. K. (1999). Caught in the web of relations: Giving voice to abused Portuguese-speaking immigrant women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
16.
Haile-Mariam, T., & Smith, J. (1999). Domestic violence against women in the international community. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 17, 617-630.
17.
Heise, L., Ellsberg, M., & Meintel, D. (1999). Ending violence against women. Population Reports, 27(4), 1-44.
18.
Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
Kulwicki, A. D., & Miller, J. (1999). Domestic violence in the Arab American population: Transforming environmental conditions through community education. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 20, 199-215.
20.
Leidig, M. W. (1992). The continuum of violence against women: Psychological and physical consequences. Journal of the American College Health, 40, 149-155.
21.
MacLeod, L., & Shin, M. (1990). Isolated, afraid and forgotten. The service delivery needs and realities of immigrant and refugee women who are battered (Report No. H72-21/78-1992E). Ottawa, Ontario: National Clearing house of Family Violence, Health and Welfare Canada.
22.
Mattson, S., & Rodriguez, E. (1999). Battering in pregnant Latinas. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 20, 405-422.
23.
Meintel, D., Labelle, M., Turcotte, G., & Kempineers, M. (1984). Migration, wage labor, and domestic relationships: Immigrant women workers in Montreal. Anthropologica, 26, 135-169.
24.
Miedema, B., & Wachholz, S. (1999). A complex web: Access to justice for abused immigrant women in New Brunswick. Canadian Women Studies, 19, 175-181.
25.
Moraes, C. L., Hasselmann, M. H., & Reichenheim, M. E. (in press). Adaptação transcultural para o português do intrumento “Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2)” utilizado para identificar a violência entre casais [Portuguese transcultural adaptation of the instrument “Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2)” used for the identification of couple violence]. Cadernos de Saúde Pública.
26.
National Conference of Catholic Bishops. (1992). When I call for help: A pastoral response to domestic violence against women (Report No. 547-X). Washington, DC: Office for Publishing and Promotion Services United States Catholic Conference.
27.
Noivo, E. (1997). Inside ethnic families: Three generations of Portuguese-Canadians. Montreal, Quebec/Kingston, Ontario: McGill-Queen University Press.
28.
Nunes, F. (1998). Portuguese-Canadians from sea to sea: A national needs assessment (Report No. 520). Toronto, Ontario: Portuguese-Canadian National Congress.
29.
Pepler, D. J., & Lessa, I. (1993). The mental health of Portuguese children. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 46-50.
Raj, A., & Silverman, J. (2002). Violence against immigrant women: The roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8, 367-398.
32.
Smith, M. E. (1980). The Portuguese female immigrant: The ‘marginal man.’International Migration Review, 14, 77-92.
33.
Smith, M. E. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257-273.
34.
Statistics Canada. (2001). Population by mother tongue, census metropolitan areas [Table]. Available from http://www.statcan.ca/start.html
35.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
36.
Szado, D. (1987). Social roots of wife battering: An examination of the phenomenon in Mediterranean immigrant communities. Canadian Women Studies, 8, 41-42.
37.
Taylor, J. M. (1996). Cultural stories: Latina and Portuguese daughters and mothers. In B. J. R. Leadbeater& N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 117-131). New York: New York University Press.
38.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). American fact finder detailed tables Census 2000 summary file 3 (SF 3)—sample data [On-line]. Available from http://factfinder.census.gov
39.
Williams, J. (1990). Azorean migration patterns in the United States. In D. Higgs (Ed.), Portuguese migration in global perspective (pp. 145-157). Toronto, Canada: Multicultural history society of Ontario.
40.
Yoshihama, M. (2001). Immigrants-in-context framework: Understanding the interactive influence of socio-cultural contexts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 307-318.
