Rehabilitation programs for adult violent offending are still novel, and few published studies examine the recidivism outcomes of those who complete such programs. This study describes a New Zealand prison program for high-risk violent men. The program is intensive and cognitive behavioral. Preliminary outcome data are presented for three indices during2 or more years of follow-up: nonviolentre conviction, violent reconviction, and subsequent imprisonment. In comparison with untreated offenders, treated men were less likely to be reconvicted of a violent offense, and those who were took longer to fail. There was also a 12% difference in favor of the treated men on the two other indices, nonviolent reconviction and reimprisonment. The authors conclude that the program shows early promise and that further evaluation with a larger sample of treated men will be important in clarifying whether the program is having a differential impact on violent versus nonviolent offending.!
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 17, 19-52.
3.
Bakker, L., Riley, D., & O’Malley, J. (1999). Risk of reconviction: Statistical models predicting four types of reoffending. Christchurch, NZ: Department of Corrections Psychological Service.
4.
Berry, S. (1999). The Montgomery House Violence Prevention Programme: An evaluation. Wellington, NZ: Department of Corrections Psychological Service.
5.
Berry, S. (2003). Stopping violent offending in New Zealand: Is treatment an option?New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 32, 92-100.
6.
Bush, J. (1995a). Cognitive self-change: A program manual. Burlington: Vermont Department of Corrections.
7.
Bush, J. (1995b). Teaching self-risk management to violent offenders. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending—guidelines from research and practice (pp. 139-154). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
8.
Clark, C. (2003). Annual update of forecasts of the prison population. Retrieved on April 2, 2004, from http//:www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/2004/prison-forecast/index.html
9.
Dixon, B. G., & Behrnes, S. (1996). Violence prevention project reconviction study: Overview of study and findings. Unpublished report, New Zealand Department of Corrections Psychological Service.
10.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent offending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 449-467.
11.
Dowden, C., Blanchette, K., & Serin, R. (1999). Anger management programming for federal male inmates: An effective intervention. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.
12.
Goldstein, A. P. (1988). The prepare curriculum: Teaching prosocial competencies. Champaign, IL: Research.
13.
Lösel, F. (2001). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional programs: Bridging the gap between research and practice. In G. A. Bernfeldet al. (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice (pp. 67-92). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
14.
Marques, J. K., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & West, M. A. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offender recidivism: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 21, 28-54.
15.
McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G., Livingston, J. A., & Hoke, S. E. (2003). Outcome of a treatment program for adult sex offenders: From prison to community. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 3-17.
16.
McGuire, J. (Ed.). (1995). What works: Reducing reoffending—guidelines from research and practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
17.
Polaschek, D. L. L., & Collie, R. M. (2004). Rehabilitating serious violent adult offenders: An empirical and theoretical stocktake. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 321-334.
18.
Polaschek, D. L. L., & Dixon, B. G. (2001). The Violence Prevention Project: The development and evaluation of a treatment programme for violent offenders. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 7, 1-23.
19.
Polaschek, D. L. L., & Reynolds, N. (2001). Assessment and treatment: Violent offenders. In C. R. Hollin (Ed.), Handbook of offender assessment and treatment (pp. 415-431). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20.
Rich, M., (1999). Department of Corrections Census of Prison Inmates 1999. Wellington, NZ: Department of Corrections.
21.
Robinson, D. (1995). The impact of cognitive skills training on postrelease recidivism among Canadian federal offenders (R-41). Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada, Correctional Research and Development.
22.
Ross, R. R., & Fabiano, E. A. (1985). Time to think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Sciences and Arts.
23.
Selvin S. (2004). Statistical analysis of epidemiologic data (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
Serin, R. C., & Preston, D. L. (2001). Managing and treating violent offenders. In J. B. Ashfordet al. (Eds.), Treating adult and juvenile offenders with special needs (pp. 249-271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
Simon, L. M. J. (1997). Do criminal offenders specialize in crime types?Applied and Preventative Psychology, 6, 35-53.
26.
Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. (1977). The criminal personality: Vol. 2. The change process. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
