Impact of Stress and Mitigating Information on Evaluations,Attributions,Affect,Disciplinary Choices,and Expectations of Compliance in Mothers at High and Low Risk for Child Physical Abuse
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2006
Impact of Stress and Mitigating Information on Evaluations,Attributions,Affect,Disciplinary Choices,and Expectations of Compliance in Mothers at High and Low Risk for Child Physical Abuse
The objective is to know if high-risk mothers for child physical abuse differ in their evaluations, attributions, negative affect, disciplinary choices for children's behavior, and expectations of compliance. The effect of a stressor and the introduction of mitigating information are analyzed. Forty-seven high-risk and 48 matched low-risk mothers participated in the study. Mothers' information processing and disciplinary choices were examined using six vignettes depicting a child engaging in different transgressions. A four-factor design with repeated measures on the last two factors was used. High-risk mothers reported more hostile intent, global and internal attributions, more use of power assertion discipline, and less induction. A risk group by child transgression interaction and a risk group by mitigating information interaction were found. Results support the social information–processing model of child physical abuse, which suggests that high-risk mothers process childrelated information differently and use more power assertive and less inductive disciplinary techniques.
Bauer, W. D., & Twentyman, C. T. (1985). Abusing, neglectful, and comparison mothers' responses to child-related and non-related stressors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 335-343.
2.
Bousha, D. M., & Twentyman, C. T. (1984). Mother-child interactional style in abuse, neglect, and control groups: Naturalistic observations in the home. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 106-114.
3.
Bradley, E. J., & Peters, R. (1991). Physically abusive and nonabusive mothers' perceptions of parenting and child behavior.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,61, 455-460.
4.
Burgess, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (1978). Family interaction in abusive, neglectful, and normal families. Child Development,49, 1163-1173.
5.
Casanova, G. M., Domanic, J., McCanne, T. R., & Milner, J. S. (1992). Physiological responses to non-child-related stressors in mothers at risk for child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect,16, 31-44.
6.
Caselles, C. E., & Milner, J. S. (2000). Evaluations of child transgressions, disciplinary choices, and expected child compliance in a no-cry and crying-infant condition in physically abusive and comparison mothers. Child Abuse & Neglect,24(4), 477-491.
7.
Chilamkurti, C., & Milner, J. S. (1993). Perceptions and evaluations of child transgressions and disciplinary techniques in highand low-risk mothers and their children. Child Development,64, 1801-1814.
8.
Cicchetti, D., & Rizley, R. (1981). Developmental perspectives on the etiology, intergenerational transmission, and sequelae of child maltreatment.New Directions for Child Development,11, 31-55.
9.
Crowe, H. P., & Zeskind, P. S. (1992). Psychophysiological and perceptual responses to infant cries varying in pitch: Comparison of adults with low and high scores on the child abuse potential inventory. Child Abuse & Neglect,3, 491-496.
10.
Dadds, M. R., Mullins, M. J., McAlliester, R. A., & Atkinson, E. (2003). Attributions, affect, and behavior in abuse-risk mothers: A laboratory study. Child Abuse & Neglect,27, 21-45.
11.
De Paúl, J., Arruabarrena, M. I., Múgica, P., & Milner, J. S. (1999). Validación de una versión española del Child Abuse Potential Inventory [Validation of a Spanish version of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory]. Estudios de Psicología,62-63, 55-72.
12.
Dessureau, B. K., Kurowski, C. O., & Thompson, N. S. (1998). A reassessment of the role of pitch and duration in adult's responses to infant crying. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 367-371.
13.
Disbrow, M. A., Doerr, H., & Caulfield, C. (1977). Measuring the components of parents' potential for child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect,1, 279-296.
14.
Dopke, C., & Milner, J. S. (2000). Impact of child noncompliance on stress appraisals, attributions, and disciplinary choices in mothers at high and low risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect,24, 493-504.
15.
Foody, R. (1993). Attributions, mitigating information, and physical child abuse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
16.
Friedrich, W. N., Tyler, J. D., & Clark, J. A. (1985). Personality and psychophysiological variables in abusive, neglectful, and low-income control mothers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,173, 449-460.
17.
Frodi, A. M. (1981). Contribution of infant characteristics to child abuse. American Journal of Mental Deficiency,85, 341-349.
18.
Frodi, A. M., & Lamb, M. E. (1980). Child abusers' responses to infant smiles and cries. Child Development,51, 238-241.
19.
Hillson, J. M., & Kuiper, N. A. (1994). A stress and coping model of child maltreatment. Clinical Psychology Review,14, 261-286.
20.
Hoffman, M. L. (1970). Moral internalization: Current theory and research. Developmental Psychology,3, 87-133.
21.
Kelley, M. L., Grace, N., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Acceptability of positive and punitive discipline methods: Comparisons among abusive, potentially abusive, and nonabusive parents. Child Abuse & Neglect,14, 219-226.
22.
Knutson, J. G. (1978). Child abuse as an area of aggression research. Journal of Pediatric Psychiatric,3, 20-27.
23.
Kravitz, M. A., & Driscoll, J. M. (1983). Expectations for childhood development among child-abusing and nonabusing parents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,53, 336-344.
24.
Lahey, B. B., Conger, R. D., Atkenson, B. M., & Treiber, F. A. (1984). Parenting behavior and emotional status of physically abusive mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,52, 1062-1071.
25.
Larrance, D. T., & Twentyman, C. T. (1983). Maternal attributions and child abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,92, 449-457.
26.
Lenton, R. L. (1990). Techniques of child discipline and abuse by parents. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology,27, 157-184.
27.
Lesnik-Oberstein, M., Cohen, L., & Koers, A. J. (1982). Research in the Netherlands on a theory of child abuse: A preliminary report. Child Abuse & Neglect,6, 199-206.
28.
McCanne, T. R., & Milner, J. S. (1991). Physiological reactivity of physically abusive and at-risk subjects to child-related stimuli. In J. S. Milner (Ed.),Neuropsychology of aggression(pp. 147-166). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
29.
Milner, J. S. (1986). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: Manual(2nd ed.). Webster, NC: Psytec Corporation.
30.
Milner, J. S. (1993). Social information processing and physical child abuse. Clinical Psychology Review,13, 275-294.
31.
Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: The Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Clinical Psychological Review,14, 547-583.
32.
Milner, J. S. (2000). Social information processing and child physical abuse: Theory and research. In D. J. Hersen (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 45. Motivation and child maltreatment(pp. 39-84). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
33.
Milner, J. S. (2003). Social information processing in high-risk and physically abusive parents. Chid Abuse & Neglect,27, 7-20.
34.
Milner, J. S., & Chilamkurti, C. (1991). Physical child abuse perpetrator characteristics: A review of the literature. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,6, 345-366.
35.
Milner, J. S., & Dopke, C. (1997). Child physical abuse: Review of offender characteristics. In D. A. Wolfe, R. J. McMahon, & R. D. Peters (Eds.),Child abuse: New directions in prevention and treatment across the lifespan (pp. 27-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Milner, J. S., & Foody, R. (1994). The impact of mitigating information on attributions for positive and negative child behavior by adults at lowand high-risk for child abuse behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,13, 335-351.
37.
Milner, J. S., Halsey, L. B., & Fultz, J. (1995). Empathic responsiveness and affective reactivity to infant stimuli in highand low-risk for physical child abuse mothers. Child Abuse & Neglect,19, 767-780.
38.
Monroe, L. D., & Schellenbach, C. J. (1986, August). Cognitive components of child abuse potential. Paper presented at the National Conference of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
39.
Monroe, L. D., & Schellenbach, C. J. (1989). Relationship of Child Abuse Potential Inventory scores to parental responses: A construct validity study. Child and Family Behavior Therapy,11, 39-58.
40.
Montes, M. P., De Paúl, J., & Milner, J. S. (2001). Evaluations, attributions, affect, and disciplinary choices in mothers at high and low risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect,25, 1015-1036.
41.
Nayak, M. B., & Milner, J. S. (1998). Neuropsychological functioning: Comparison of mothers at highand low-risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect,22, 687-703.
42.
Nucci, L. P. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal concepts. Child Development,52, 114-121.
43.
Nucci, L. P., & Nucci, M. S. (1982). Children's social interactions in the context of moral and conventional transgressions. Child Development,53, 403-412.
44.
Oldershaw, L., Walters, G. C., & Hall, D. K. (1986). Control strategies and noncompliance in abusive mother-child dyads: An observational study. Child Development,57, 722-732.
45.
Pruitt, D. L., & Erickson, M. R. (1986). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: A study of concurrent validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology,41, 104-111.
46.
Rosenberg, M. S., & Repucci, N. D. (1983). Abusive mothers: Perceptions of their own and their children's behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,51, 674-682.
47.
Schellenbach, C. J., Monroe, L. D., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1991). The impact of stress on cognitive components of child abuse potential. Journal of Family Violence,6, 61-80.
48.
Smetana, J. (1981). Preschool children's conceptualizations of moral and social rules. Child Development,52, 1333-1336.
49.
Stasiewicz, P. R., & Lisman, S. A. (1989). Effects of infant cries on alcohol consumption in college males at risk for child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect,13, 463-470.
50.
Susman, E. J., Trickett, P. K., Iannotti, R. J., Hollenbeck, B. E., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (1985). Child-rearing patterns in depressed, abusive, and normal mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,55, 237-251.
51.
Tisak, M. S. (1986). Children's conceptions of parental authority. Child Development,57, 166-176.
52.
Trickett, P. R., & Kuczynski, L. (1986). Children's misbehaviors and parental discipline strategies in abusive and nonabusive families. Developmental Psychology,22, 115-123.
53.
Trickett, P. R., & Susman, E. J. (1988). Parental perceptions of child-rearing practices in physically abusive and nonabusive families. Developmental Psychology,24, 270-276.
54.
Valle, A. (1998). Physical child abuse: Cognitive and affective responses to children's transgressions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
55.
Webster-Stratton, C. (1985). Comparison of abusive and nonabusive families with conductdisordered children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,55, 59-69.
56.
Weston, D., & Turiel, E. (1980). Act-rule relations: Children's concepts of social rules. Developmental Psychology,16, 417-424.
57.
Wolfe, D. A., Fairbank, J. A., Kelly, J. A., & Bradlyn, A. S. (1983). Child abuse parents' physiological responses to stressful and non-stressful behavior in children. Behavioral Assessment, 5, 363-371.
58.
Zeskind, P. S., & Lester, B. M. (1978). Acoustic features and auditory perceptions of the cries of newborns with prenatal and perinatal complications. Child Development,49, 580-589.
59.
Zeskind, P. S., & Marshall, T. R. (1988). The relation between variations in pitch and maternal perceptions of infant crying. Child Development,59, 193-196.
60.
Zeskind, P. S., & Shingler, L. (1991). Child abusers' perceptual to newborn infant cries varying in pitch. Infant Behavior and Development,14, 335-347.
