Until recently, research studies have implied that domestic violence does not affect Asian American and immigrant communities, or even Asians abroad, because ethnicity or culture has not been addressed. In this content analysis, the authors examined trends in publications in leading scholarly journals on violence relating to Asian women and domestic violence. A coding schema was developed, with two raters coding the data with high interrater reliability. Sixty articles were published over the 16 years studied, most atheoretical and focusing on individual levels of analysis. The terms used in discussing domestic violence reflected a feminist perspective. Three quarters of the studies were empirical, with most guided by logical positivism using quantitative designs. Most targeted specific Asian subgroups (almost a third focused on Asian Indians) rather than categorizing Asians as a general ethnic category. The concept of “Asian culture” was most often assessed by discussing Asian family structure. Future research is discussed in light of the findings.
Barnes, S.Y. (1999). Theories of spouse abuse: Relevance to African Americans. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 20(4), 357-371.
2.
Behl, L.E., Crouch, J.L., May, P.F., Valente, A.L., & Conyngham, H.A. (2001). Ethnicity in child maltreatment research: A content analysis. Child Maltreatment, 6(2), 143-147.
3.
Betancourt, H., & Lopez, S. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race inAmerican psychology. American Psychologist, 48(6), 629-637.
4.
Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction . In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11-26). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Bush, I.R., Epstein, I., & Sainz, A. (1997). The use of social science sources in social work practice journals: An application of citation analysis. Social Work Research, 21(1), 45-57.
6.
Chiovitti, R.F., & Piran, N. (2003). Methodological issues in nursing research: Rigour and grounded theory research. Journal of Advanced Nursing , 44(4), 427-435.
7.
Crenshaw, K. (1992). Race, gender, and sexual harassment. Southern California Law Review, 65, 1467-1476.
8.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
9.
Cuellar, I. (2000). Acculturation and mental health: Ecological transactional relations of adjustment. In I. Cuellar & F. A. Paniagua (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural mental health (pp. 45-62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
Davis, L.V., & Hagen, J.L. (1992). The problem of wife abuse: The interrelationship of social policy and social work practice. Social Work, 37(1), 15-26.
11.
Donmoyer, R. (1996). Educational research in an era of paradigm proliferation: What's a journal editor to do?Educational Researcher, 25(2), 19-25.
12.
Dutton, D.G. (1988). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Fraser, M., & Taylor, M.J. (1991). Social work and science: Many ways of knowing ? Social Work Research & Abstracts, 27(4), 5-15.
14.
Gelles, R.J. (1993). Through a sociological lens: Social structure and family violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 31-46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Gelles, R.J., & Loseke, D.R. (1993). Issues in conceptualization. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 1-5). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Gordon, M.M. (1964). Assimilation in American life. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Johnson, M.P., & Ferraro, K.J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 948-963.
18.
Kondrat, M.E. (2002). Actor-centered social work: Re-visioning "Person-in-Environment" through a critical theory lens. Social Work, 47(4), 435-448.
19.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2001). Metaphors as a way to explore qualitative data . International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education , 14(3), 367-379.
20.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2004). Displacing metaphorical analysis: Reading with and against metaphors. Qualitative Research, 4(3), 339-360.
21.
Kurz, D. (1989). Social science perspective in wife abuse: Current debates and future directions. Gender and Society, 3(4), 489-505.
22.
Lee, E. (1996). Asian American families: An overview. In M. McGoldrick, J. Giordano, & J. K. Pearce (Eds.), Ethnicity and family therapy (2nd ed., pp. 227-248). New York: Guilford .
23.
Lee, Y., Driscoll, M.P., & Nelson, D.W. (2004). The past, present, and future of research in distance education: Results of a content analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 225-241.
24.
Lenton, R.L. (1995). Power versus feminist theories of wife abuse. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37(3), 305-330.
25.
Loseke, D.R. (1987). The lived realities and the construction of social problems: The case of wife abuse. Symbolic Interaction, 10(2), 229-243.
26.
Loseke, D.R., & Cahill, S.E. (1984). The social construction of deviance: Experts on battered women. Social Problems, 3(3), 296-310.
27.
Mays, J.M. (2006). Feminist disability theory: Domestic violence against women with a disability. Disability and Society, 21(2), 147-158.
28.
Miller, A.B., & Cross, T. (2006). Ethnicity in child maltreatment research: A replication of Bel et al.'s content analysis. Child Maltreatment, 11(1), 16-26.
29.
Murphy, C.M., & O'Leary, K.D. (1994). Research paradigms, values, and spouse abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(2), 207-223.
30.
Salazar, L.F., & Cook, S.L. (2002). Violence against women: Is psychology part of the problem or solution? A content analysis of psychological research from 1990 through 1999. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 410-421.
31.
Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Silka, L., & Tip, J. (1994). Empowering the silent ranks: The Southeast Asian experience. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(4), 497-529.
33.
Sue, D.W. (1981). Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice. New York: John Wiley.
34.
Sutherland, E.H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
35.
Suyemoto, K.L. (2002). Redefining "Asian American" identity: Reflections on differentiating ethnic and racial identities for Asian American individuals and communities. In L. Zhan (Ed.), Asian Americans: Vulnerable populations, model interventions, and clarifying agendas (pp. 195-231). Boston: Jones & Bartlett.
36.
Uba, L. (2002). A postmodern psychology of Asian Americans: Creating knowledge of a racial minority. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2004). We the people: Asians in the United States: Census 2000 special reports. Retrieved April 13, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/censr-17.pdf
38.
Volpp, L. (2005). Feminism versus multiculturalism. In N. J. Sokoloff & C. Pratt (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture (pp. 39-49). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
39.
White, M., & Marsh, E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22-45.
40.
Worthington, R.L., & Navarro, R.L. (2003). Pathways to the future: Analyzing the contents of a content analysis. Counseling Psychologist, 31(1), 85-92.
41.
Yllo, K.A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence . In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Yoshioka, M.R., & Choi, D.Y. (2005). Culture and interpersonal violence research: Paradigm shift to create a full continuum of domestic violence services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 513-519.
43.
Yu, E.S. H., & Liu, W.T. (1992). U.S. national health data on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: A research agenda for the 1990's . American Journal of Public Health, 82(12), 1645-1652.
