This study examined protective order (PO) outcomes for a period of 12 months for 698 women from multiple jurisdictions. Overall, results indicate that 2 out of 5 women did not experience violence after the PO was issued; however, 3 out of 5 women did experience ongoing violence. Two key risk factors were associated with PO violations and are examined. Further, only 9% of women dropped the order, and the vast majority of women perceived the PO was effective and that they felt safe. Results from this study suggest that POs are an important avenue for women's safety. However, results also suggest that PO effectiveness can be increased by attending to specific risk factors, crafting POs to meet individual needs, and by appropriate enforcement.
Belknap, J., & Potter, H. (2005). The trails of measuring the "success" of domestic violence policies. Criminology and Public Policy, 4(3), 559-556.
2.
Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
3.
Carlson, M., Harris, S., & Holden, G. (1999). Protective orders and domestic violence: Risk factors for re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 14(2), 205-226.
4.
Chitwood, D., McBride, D., Metsch, L., Comerford, M., & McCoy, C. (1998). A comparison of the need for health care and use of health care by injection-drug users, other chronic drug users, and nondrug users. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(8), 1107-1122.
5.
DeJong, C., & Burgess-Proctor, A. (2006). A summary of personal protection order statutes in the United States. Violence Against Women, 12(1), 68-88.
6.
Eigenberg, H., McGuffee, K., Berry, P., & Hall, W. (2003). Protective order legislation: Trends in state statutes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 411-422.
7.
Elder, G. (1985). Perspectives on the life course. In G. Elder, Jr. (Ed.), Life course dynamics (pp. 23-49). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
Finn, P. (1989). Statutory authority in the use and enforcement of civil protection orders against domestic abuse. Family Law Quarterly, 23, 43-73.
9.
Finn, P. (1991). Civil protection orders: A flawed opportunity for intervention. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policy responses (pp. 155-189). Cincinnati, OH: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences and Anderson Publishing.
10.
Finn, P., & Colson, S. (1998). Civil protection orders: Legislation, current court practice and enforcement. Legal interventions in family violence: Research findings and policy implications (NCJ Publication No. 171666, pp.44-46). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
11.
Fischer, K., & Rose, M. (1995). When "enough is enough": Battered women's decision making around court orders of protection. Crime & Delinquency , 41(4), 414-429.
12.
Gondolf, E., McWilliams, J., Hart, B., & Stuehling, J. (1994). Court response to petitions for civil protection orders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(4), 503-517.
13.
Harrell, A., & Smith, B. (1996). Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In E. Buzawa & C. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 214-242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Harrell, A., Smith, B., & Newmark, L. (1993). Court processing and the effects of restraining orders for domestic violence victims. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
15.
Hotaling, G., & Buzawa, E. (2003). Forgoing criminal justice assistance: The non-reporting of new incidents of abuse in a court sample of domestic violence victims (NCJ 195667, U.S. Department of Justice). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16.
Kaci, J. (1994). Aftermath of seeking domestic violence protective orders: The victim's perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 10(3), 204-219.
17.
Keilitz, S., Hannaford, P., & Efkeman, H. (1997). Civil protection orders: The benefits and limitations for victims of domestic violence (Publication No. R-201). Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts Research Report.
18.
Logan, T., & Cole, J. (in press). The impact of partner stalking on mental health and protective order outcomes over time. Violence and Victims.
19.
Logan, T.Cole, J., Shannon, L., & Walker, R. (2006). Partner stalking: How women respond, cope, and survive. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
20.
Logan, T., Cole, J., Shannon, L., & Walker, R. (2007). Relationship characteristics and protective orders among a diverse sample of women. Journal of Family Violence , 22, 237-246.
21.
Logan, T., Shannon, L., Cole, J., & Walker, R. (2007). Does relationship status affect protective order violations? Manuscript submitted for publication.
22.
Logan, T., Shannon, L., & Walker, R. (2005). Protective orders process and barriers in rural and urban areas: A multiperspective study. Violence Against Women, 11(7), 876-911.
23.
Logan, T., Shannon, L., Walker, R., & Faragher, T. (2006). Protective orders: Questions and conundrums. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7(3), 175-205.
24.
Logan, T., Walker, R., Cole, J., Ratliff, S., & Leukefeld, C. (2003). Qualitative differences among rural and urban intimate violence victimization experiences and consequences: A pilot study . Journal of Family Violence, 18(2), 83-92.
25.
Logan, T., Walker, R., Horvath, L., & Leukefeld, C. (2003). Divorce, custody, and spousal violence: a random sample of docket records in a circuit court. Journal of Family Violence, 18(5), 269-279.
26.
Logan, T., Walker, R., Jordan, C., & Horvath, L. (2002). Child custody evaluations and domestic violence: Case comparisons. Violence and Victims, 17(6), 719-742.
27.
Logan, T., Walker, R., Jordan, C., & Leukefeld, C. (2006). Women and victimization: Contributing factors, interventions, and implications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
28.
Logan, T., Walker, R., Shannon, L., & Cole, J. (in press). Combining ethical considerations with recruitment and follow-up strategies for partner violence victimization research. Violence Against Women.
29.
Logan, T., Walker, R., Shannon, L., & Cole, J. (2008). Factors associated with separation and ongoing violence among women with civil protective orders. Journal of Family Violence . Published online: http://www.springerlink.com/content/410l28r01x383wv6/fulltext.pdf
30.
Logan, T., Walker, R., Stewart, C., & Allen, J. (2006). Victim service and justice system representative responses about partner stalking: What do professionals recommend? Violence and Victims, 21(1), 49-66.
31.
MacKinnon, C. (2006). Are women human? And other international dialogues . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
McFarlane, J., Malecha, A., Gist, J., Watson, K., Batten, E., Hall, I., & Smith, S. (2004). Protection orders and intimate partner violence: An 18-month study of 150 black, Hispanic, and white women. American Journal of Public Health, 94(4), 613-618.
33.
McLellan, A., Luborsky, L., O'Brien, C., & Woody, G. (1980). An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 168, 26-33.
34.
Mill, J. (1998). On liberty. In J. Gray (Ed), On liberty and other essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Mohandie, K., Meloy, J., McGowan, M., & Williams, J. (2006). The RECON typology of stalking: Reliability and validity based upon a large sample of NorthAmerican stalkers. Journal of Forensic Science, 51(1), 147-155.
36.
Nicastro, A., Cousins, A., & Spitzberg, B. (2000). The tactical face of stalking. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 69-82.
37.
Palarea, R., Zona, M., Lane, J., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1999). The dangerous nature of stalking: Threats, violence and associated risk factors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 269-283.
38.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Schwartz-Watts, D., & Morgan, D. (1998). Violent versus non-violent stalkers. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26, 241-245.
40.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30-54). Oxford , UK: Clarendon Press.
41.
Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Sheridan, L., & Davies, G. (2001). Violence and the prior victim-stalker relationship . Clinical Behavior and Mental Health, 11, 102-116.
43.
Spitzberg, B. (2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3(4), 261-288.
44.
Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
45.
Straus, M., Hamby, S., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues , 17(3), 283-316.
46.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ# 169592). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
47.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000a). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women (NCJ 183781). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
48.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000b). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence (NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
49.
Tolman, R.M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4(3), 159-177.
50.
Tolman, R.M. (1999). The validation of the psychological maltreatment of women inventory. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 25-35.
51.
Weisz, A., Tolman, R., & Bennett, L. (1998). An ecological study of nonresidential services for battered women within a comprehensive community protocol for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 13(4), 395-415.
52.
Worden, A. (2000). The changing boundaries of the criminal justice system: Redefining the problem and the response in domestic violence. In C. Friel, Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 2) boundary changes in criminal justice organization (pp. 215-266). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
