This study assessed agreement level about the occurrence of past-year male-to-female partner violence (MFPV) and female-to-male partner violence (FMPV) among a sample of 897 blue-collar couples. Intimate partner violence (IPV) was measured with the Physical Assault subscale of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Agreement level was assessed with Cohen's kappa statistic. Lower-bound estimates (based on couple agreement that an IPV event occurred) and upper-bound estimates (based on uncorroborated reports from either partner that an IPV event occurred) were calculated. Results indicated low agreement for most IPV behaviors (κ < .40). Estimated lower- and upper-bound rates for MFPV were 6.7% and 21.2%, for FMPV, 7.1% and 24.2%, and for any IPV, 10.1% and 30.2%. Findings suggest that single-point IPV prevalence estimates are biased; lower- and upper-bound estimates using collateral reports should be calculated when possible. In addition, findings underscore the importance of conducting IPV research among understudied populations, such as working-class couples, that may be at elevated IPV risk.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651-680.
2.
Armstrong, T.G., Heideman, G., Corcoran, K.J., Fisher, B., Medina, K.L., & Schafer, J. (2001). Disagreement about the occurrence of male-to-female intimate partner violence: a qualitative study. Family and Community Health, 24(1), 55-75.
3.
Armstrong, T.G., Wernke, J.Y., Medina, K.L., & Schafer, J. (2002). Do partners agree about the occurrence of intimate partner violence? A review of the current literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3(3), 181-193.
4.
Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L.E. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey (No. NCJ-154348). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
5.
Black, M.C., Kresnow, M.-J., Simon, T.R., Arias, I., & Shelley, G. (2006). Telephone survey respondents' reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 21(4), 445-459.
6.
Byrt, T., Bishop, J., & Carlin, J.B. (1993). Bias, prevalence and kappa. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(5), 423-429.
7.
Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & Field, C.A. (2005). Unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Violence and Victims, 20(4), 393-405.
8.
Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & McGrath, C. (2003). Characteristics of non-respondents in a US national longitudinal survey on drinking and intimate partner violence. Addiction, 98(6), 791-797.
9.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
10.
Cunradi, C.B., Ames, G., & Moore, R.S. (2008). Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence among a sample of construction industry workers. Journal of Family Violence, 23(2), 101-112.
11.
Cunradi, C.B., Caetano, R., & Schafer, J. (2002). Alcohol-related problems, drug use, and male intimate partner violence severity among US couples. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26(4), 493-500.
12.
Feld, S.L., & Straus, M.A. (1990). Escalation and desistance from wife assault in marriage. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 489-505). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
13.
Field, C.A., & Caetano, R. (2004). Ethnic differences in intimate partner violence in the U.S. general population: The role of alcohol use and socioeconomic status. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5(4), 303-317.
14.
Feinstein, A.R., & Cicchetti, D.V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 543-549.
15.
Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
16.
Fox, G.L., Benson, M.L., Demaris, A.A., & Van Wyk, J. (2002). Economic distress and intimate violence: Testing family stress and resources theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 793-807.
17.
Hotaling, G., & Sugarman, D. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims , 1(2), 101-124.
18.
Jasinski, J.L., Asdigian, N.L., & Kantor, G.K. (1997). Ethnic adaptations to occupational strain: Work-related stress, drinking, and wife assault among Anglo and Hispanic husbands. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(6), 814-831.
19.
Johnson, M.P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 283-294.
20.
Johnson, M.P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1003-1018.
21.
Johnson, M.P., & Ferraro, K.J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 948-963.
22.
Johnson, M.P. & Leone, J.M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 322-349.
23.
Kaufman Kantor, G. (1990). The `drunken bum' theory of wife beating. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 203-244). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
24.
Leonard, K.E., Bromet, E.J., Parkinson, D.K., Day, N.L., & Ryan, C.M. (1985). Patterns of alcohol use and physically aggressive behavior in men. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 46(4), 279-282.
25.
McNutt, L.-A., & Lee, R. (2000). Intimate partner violence prevalence estimation using telephone surveys: Understanding the effect of nonresponse bias. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152(5), 438-441.
26.
Medina, L.K., Schafer, J., Shear, P.K., & Armstrong, T.G. (2004). Memory ability is associated with disagreement about the most recent conflict in polysubstance abusing couples. Journal of Family Violence, 19(6), 387-398.
27.
Schafer, J., Caetano, R., & Clark, C.L. (1998). Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 88(11), 1702-1704.
28.
Schafer, J., Caetano, R., & Clark, C.L. (2002). Agreement about violence in U.S. couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(4), 457-470.
29.
Sorenson, S., Upchurch, D., & Shen, H. (1996). Violence and injury in marital arguments: Risk patterns and gender differences. American Journal of Public Health, 86(1), 35-40.
30.
Stets, J., & Straus, M. (1990). The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 227-244). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
31.
Straus, M.A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In X. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Straus, M.A. (2005). Women's violence toward men is a serious social problem. In D. R. Loseke, R. J. Gelles & M. M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (2nd ed., pp. 55-77). Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.
33.
Straus, M.A. (2006). Future research on gender symmetry in physical assaults on partners. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1086-1097.
34.
Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D.B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316.
35.
Szinovacz, M.E., & Egley, L.C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 995-1010.
36.
Waltermaurer, E., Ortega, C.A., & McNutt, L.-A. (2003). Issues in estimating the prevalence of intimate partner violence: Assessing the impact of abuse status on participation bias. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(9), 959-974.
