Research has established the connection between intimate partner violence victims’ empowering experiences in the court system and their satisfaction with the process, but not between these experiences and victims’ broader wellbeing, a link suggested by the framework of therapeutic jurisprudence. This study investigated the relationship between empowerment and victim depression, quality of life, fear, and intention to use the system in the future among 142 court-involved women. At 3 and 6 months after recruitment, over and above repeat abuse, the outcome of the criminal case, and expectations about the court system, more empowering experiences in the court predicted improvement in depression and quality of life, in addition to stronger intention to use the system in the future if needed. Implications include the need for research on what aspects of victim experience in the court are empowering and evaluations of innovations that can increase the likelihood they will occur.
Andrews, F., & Withey, S. ( 1976). Social indicators of wellbeing: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum .
2.
Belknap, J., & Sullivan, C.M. (2003). Longitudinal study of battered women in the system: The victims’ and decision-makers’ perceptions: Final report (Document No. 202946). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
3.
Bell, M.E. ( 2007). Empowerment and disempowerment for victims of intimate partner violence: An overview of the effects of criminal justice system practices . In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. Giacomoni (Eds.), Intimate partner violence (pp. 1-15). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
4.
Bennett Cattaneo, L., Bell, M.E., Goodman, L., & Dutton, M.A. ( 2007). Intimate partner violence victims’ accuracy in assessing their risk of re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence , 22, 429-440.
5.
Bennett Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L.A. ( 2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: A cross-disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse6, 141-175.
6.
Bennett Cattaneo, L., Goodman, L., Epstein, D., Kohn, L.S., & Zanville, H.A. (in press). The Victim Informed Prosecution Project: A quasi-experimental test of a collaborative model for cases of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women.
7.
Campbell, R. ( 2006). Rape survivors’ experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence Against Women, 12, 30-45.
8.
Campbell, R., Sefl, T., Barnes, H.E., Ahrens, C.E., Wasco, S.M., & Zaragoza-Diesfeld, Y. (1999). Community service for rape survivors: Enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 847-858.
9.
Campbell, J., & Soeken, K.L. ( 1999). Women’s responses to battering over time: An analysis of change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 21-40.
10.
Campbell, R., Wasco, S.M., Ahrens, C.E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H.E. ( 2001). Preventing the "second rape": Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239-1259.
11.
Caplow, S. ( 1998). What if there is no client? Prosecutors as "counselors" of crime. Clinical Law Review, 5, 1-45.
12.
Davies, J., Lyon, E., & Monti-Catania, D. (1998). Safety planning with battered women: Complex lives, difficult choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Dutton, M.A., Goodman, L.A., & Bennett, L. ( 1999). Court-involved battered women’s responses to violence: The role of psychological, physical, and sexual abuse. Violence & Victims, 14, 89-104.
14.
Finn, M.A. ( 2003). Effects of victims’ experiences with prosecutors on victim empowerment and re-occurrence of intimate partner violence, final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
15.
Fleury-Steiner, R.E., Bybee, D., Sullivan, C.M., Belknap, J., & Melton, H.C. ( 2006). Contextual factors impacting battered women’s intentions to reuse the criminal legal system. Journal of Community Psychology , 34, 327-342.
16.
Ford, D.A. ( 2003). Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 669-684.
17.
Goodman, L., & Epstein, D. ( 2008). Listening to battered women: A survivor-centered approach to advocacy, mental health, and justice. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
18.
Goodman, L.A., Littwin, A., Bohlig, A., Weintraub, S.R., Green, A., Walker, J., et al. (in press). Applying feminist theory to community practice: A case example of a multi-level empowerment intervention for low-income women with depression. In E. Aldarondo (Ed.), Promoting social justice through mental health practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Hartley, C.C. ( 2003). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the trial process in domestic violence felony trials. Violence Against Women , 9, 410-437.
20.
Herman, J.L. ( 1992). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Herman, J.L. ( 2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11, 571-602.
22.
Hotaling, G., & Buzawa, E.S. ( 2003). Forgoing criminal justice assistance: The non-reporting of new incidents of abuse in a sample of domestic violence victims (Document No. 195667). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Lewis, R. ( 2004). Making justice work: Effective legal interventions for domestic violence. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 204-224.
25.
Mendlowicz, M.V., & Stein, M.B. ( 2000). Quality of life in individuals with anxiety disorders . American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 669-682.
26.
Newmark, L., Harrell, A., & Salem, P. ( 1995). Domestic violence and empowerment in custody and visitation cases. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 1, 30-62.
27.
Ptacek, J. ( 1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial responses. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
28.
Radloff, L.S. ( 1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement , 1, 385-401.
29.
Schafer, J.L., & Graham, J.W. ( 2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
30.
Simon, L.M.J. ( 1996). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 43-79.
31.
Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D.B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
32.
Sullivan, C.M., & Bybee, D.I. ( 1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 43-53.
33.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. ( 2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
34.
Tolman, R.M. ( 1999). The validation of the psychological maltreatment of women inventory. Violence & Victims, 14, 25-37.
35.
Winick, B.J. ( 1997). Applying the law therapeutically in domestic violence cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 184-206.
36.
Zweig, J.M., & Burt, M.R. ( 2003). Effects of interactions among community agencies on legal system responses to domestic violence and sexual assault in STOP-funded communities . Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 249-272.
