The present study examines the effects of victim age, victim physical maturity, and respondent gender on attributions toward victims, perpetrator, and the nonoffending members of the victim’s family in a hypothetical child sexual abuse (CSA) case. Participants read a brief CSA vignette in which the male perpetrator (a school caretaker) sexually abuses a student in the school changing rooms. The victim was depicted as either a 12- or 15-year-old girl who, in terms of physical maturity, was either pre- or postpubescent. Separate 2 × 2 × 2 ANOVAs were performed on the dependent variables. Results conformed broadly to the study’s predictions with younger victims being viewed more negatively than older victims and the victim’s physical appearance being viewed as more encouraging of CSA for the younger than for the older girl. Female participants were more likely to endorse the belief that the younger victim should have fought back and that the prepubescent 15-year-old victim should have fought back more than her postpubescent counterpart. While attributions toward the perpetrator and victim’s family did not differ across conditions for women, men tended to blame the perpetrator more when victims were younger and the family more when victims were less physically mature. Findings are discussed in relation to norm theory principles, just world theory, and the defensive attribution hypothesis.
Anderson, I., & Doherty, K. ( 2007). Accounting for rape: Psychology, feminism and discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
2.
Back, S., & Lips, H.M. ( 1998). Child sexual abuse: Victim age, victim gender, and observer gender as factors contributing to attributions of responsibility. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 1239-1252.
3.
Birnbaum, M.H. ( 1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 401-485). Hillside, NJ: Earlbaum.
4.
Bottoms, B.L., & Goodman, G.S. ( 1994). Perceptions of children’s credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-732.
5.
Broussard, S.D., & Wagner, W.G. ( 1988). Child sexual abuse: Who is to blame? Child Abuse & Neglect, 12, 563-569.
6.
Davenport, J. ( 2005, February 28). Judge rules child abuse case "trivial." London Evening Standard. Retrieved May 11, 2010, from http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-16925433-judge-rules-child-abuse-case-trivial.do
7.
Davies, M. ( 2002). Attitudes towards rape as a function of the victim’s gender and sexual orientation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
8.
Davies, M., & Rogers, P. ( 2004). Attributions towards the victims and perpetrators in a child sexual abuse case: Roles of the participant, perpetrator and victim gender. Forensic Update, 79, 17-23.
9.
Davies, M., & Rogers, P. ( 2006). Perceptions of male victims in depicted sexual assault: A review of the literature. Aggression & Violent Behaviour , 11, 367-377.
10.
Davies, M., & Rogers, P. ( 2009). Perceptions of blame and credibility toward victims of childhood sexual abuse: Differences across victim age, victim-perpetrator relationship and respondent gender in a depicted case. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(1), 78-92.
11.
Davies, M., Smith, R., & Rogers, P. ( 2009). Police perceptions of rape as a function of victim gender and sexuality. Police Journal, 82, 4-12.
12.
Fergusson, D.M., & Mullen, P.E. ( 1999). Childhood sexual abuse: An evidence based perspective . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Galambos, N.L., & Tilton-Weaver, L.C. (2000). Adolescents’ psychosocial maturity, problem behaviour and subjective age: In search of the adultoid. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 178-192.
14.
Graham, L., Rogers, P., & Davies, M. ( 2007). Attributions in a hypothetical child sexual abuse case: Roles of abuse type, family response and respondent gender. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 733-745.
15.
Griffin, S. ( 1971). Rape: The all-American crime. Ramparts , 10, 26-35.
16.
Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. ( 2004). The differences that norms make: Empiricism, social constructionism and the interpretation of group differences. Sex Roles, 50, 445-453.
17.
Hestick, H., & Perrino, C.S. ( 2009). African-American undergraduates’ perceptions and attributions of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(1), 61-77.
18.
Howard, J. ( 1984). Societal influences on attribution: Blaming some victims more than others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 47, 494-505.
19.
Is Scarlett Keeling’s mother really the guilty one? ( 2008, March 12). Daily Mirror. Retrieved March 1, 2009, from http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/columnists/sue-carroll/2008/03/12/is-scarlett-keeling-s-mother-really-the-guilty-one-115875-20348288/
20.
Jones, M.E., Russell, R.L., & Bryant, F.B. ( 1998). The structure of rape attitudes for men and women: A three-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 331-350.
21.
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D.T. ( 1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136-153.
22.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. ( 1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from Availability: A heuristics for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology, 5, pp. 207-232, by A. Tversky & D. Kahneman, 1973)
23.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Kunda, Z. ( 1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Lerner, M.J., & Miller, D.T. ( 1978). Just word research and the attribution process: Looking back and looking ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051.
26.
Lerner, M. ( 1980). The belief in a just world: The fundamental delusion . London: Plenum.
27.
Maynard, C., & Wiederman, M. ( 1997). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of child sexual abuse: Effects of age, sex, and gender role attitudes. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 833-844.
28.
McCauley, M.R., & Parker, J.F. ( 2001). When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim’s age and juror’s gender on children’s credibility and verdict in a sexual abuse case. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 523-539.
29.
Miller, D.T., Taylor, B., & Buck, M.L. ( 1991). Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61(1), 5-12.
30.
Miller, G.R., & Burgoon, J.K. ( 1982). Factors affecting assessments of witness credibility . In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 169-196). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Murdered Scarlett’s mum faces negligence probe. ( 2008, March 11). The Metro. Retrieved May 25, 2010, from http://www.metro.co.uk/news/115375-murdered-scarletts-mum-faces-negligence-probe
32.
Pollard, P. ( 1992). Judgements about victims and attackers in depicted rapes: A review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 309-326.
33.
Putman, A.G. ( 2002). College student’s perceptions of date rape: The relationship between personal relevance and victim empathy. Dissertations Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering , 63(5-B), 2599.
34.
Reynolds, L.L., & Birkimer, J.C. (2002). Perceptions of child sexual abuse: Victim and perpetrator characteristics, treatment efficacy and lay vs. legal opinions of abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse , 11(1), 53-74.
35.
Rogers, P., & Davies, M. ( 2007). Perceptions of credibility and attributions of blame towards victim in a childhood sexual abuse case: Gender and age factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 566-584.
36.
Rogers, P., Josey, N., & Davies, M. ( 2007). The contributions of victim age, victim attractiveness, abuse frequency and respondent gender on attributions of blame in a hypothetical child sexual abuse case. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13(2), 1-17.
37.
Schoenberg, N.E., & Ravdal, H. ( 2000). Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinal research . International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(1), 63-74.
38.
Shaver, K.G. ( 1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101-113.
39.
Shaver, K.G. ( 1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blame-worthiness. New York: Springer Verlag.
40.
Sleed, M., Durrheim, K., Kriel, A., Solomon, V., & Baxter, V. ( 2002). The effectiveness of the vignette methodology: A comparison of written and video vignettes in eliciting responses about date rape. South African Journal of Psychology, 32(3), 21-28.
41.
Third arrest in Scarlett murder probe as Goa police say teenager was drugged before being raped and killed. (2008, March 13). Daily Mail. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-530335/Third-arrest-Scarlett-murder-probe-Goa-police-say-teenager-drugged-raped-killed.html
42.
Tilton-Weaver, L.C., Vitunski, E.T., & Galambos, N.L. (2001). Five images of maturity in adolescence: What does "grown up" mean? Journal of Adolescence , 24, 143-158.
43.
West, P. ( 1982, May). Reproducing naturally occurring stories: Vignettes in survey research (Working Paper). Aberdeen, UK: MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit.
